Magnus Bodin writes:
On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Russell Nelson wrote:
Not AOL. Hotmail only uses it for outgoing. They tried using it for
incoming, but ran into qmail-send's single-threaded processing of
incoming email. I think they were the first party to ever run into
this
] It means that qmail-send alternates between spawning jobs and
] processing incoming mail. If mail arrives too quickly, the todo
] section of the queue can create very large directories (because todo
] is not a hashed tree of directories). Once qmail-send gets more than
] 1,000 (or thereabouts
On Tue, Aug 24, 1999 at 12:51:47PM -, Martin Ouwehand wrote:
Which makes me wonder: why aren't the todo and intd trees hashed like mess,
info, remote and local ?
From what I have heard, Dan's zeroseek technology, scheduled for incorporation
in qmail 2.0, is supposed to address this problem
On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Russell Nelson wrote:
Magnus Bodin writes:
On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Russell Nelson wrote:
Not AOL. Hotmail only uses it for outgoing. They tried using it for
incoming, but ran into qmail-send's single-threaded processing of
incoming email. I think they
Magnus Bodin writes:
Doesn't your todo-patch fix this? (The "hashed tree of
directories"-problem.)
Yes. http://www.qmail.org/big-todo.103.patch .
--
-russ nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | Government schools are so
521
: Yes, I think this was part of my problem a few days ago (see the "Lots
: and lots of qmail-queue's" thread). Which makes me wonder: why aren't
: the todo and intd trees hashed like mess, info, remote and local ? On my
: busy Solaris server, it took *seconds* to do an "ls" in todo or intd,
: so
Magnus Bodin wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Russell Nelson wrote:
Not AOL. Hotmail only uses it for outgoing. They tried using it for
incoming, but ran into qmail-send's single-threaded processing of
incoming email. I think they were the first party to ever run into
this problem, and
On Tue, Aug 10, 1999, Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mirko Zeibig writes:
Once upon a time someone in this list told (or is it on djb's site?), Redhat
would do it's lists with qmail as well.
Yes, they used to, but no longer. They had some trouble with qmail,
didn't ask for
Mirko Zeibig writes:
Once upon a time someone in this list told (or is it on djb's site?), Redhat
would do it's lists with qmail as well.
Yes, they used to, but no longer. They had some trouble with qmail,
didn't ask for help, and bagged it.
Stanley Horwitz writes:
If I am not mistaken,
On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Jeffrey Skelton wrote:
What about Critical Path? Do they use qmail - or at least
something derived from qmail.
Egroups.com
both in and out, AFAIK, and ezmlm for the list management (or derivative
of)
Jeffrey Skelton wrote:
At 09:10 AM 8/10/99 , Russell Nelson wrote:
Stanley Horwitz writes:
If I am not mistaken, AOL and Hotmail both run qmail and as you
probably know, there's something like 4,000,000 AOL users. You might
find more info of this nature on the Qmail Web site.
Jeffrey Skelton writes:
What about Critical Path? Do they use qmail - or at least
something derived from qmail.
They host a lot of mailboxes.
Netzero runs Qmail on their mail servers.
However, it appears that they run qmail-smtpd as root...
Naughty boys.
--
Sam
12 matches
Mail list logo
