On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Russell Nelson wrote:
> listy-dyskusyjne Krzysztof Dabrowski writes:
> > Why can't we make something like this (qmail-whatever)?
> > This way we can port all the exisiting patches that everyone is applying
> > these days into one bit patch
> > and later on supporters can
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000 23:17:51 -0500 (EST), Russell Nelson wrote:
>Sure. Propose a canonical set of patches. About the only thing I
>install, and only on very high volume sites, is big-todo. Oh, and the
>rblsmtpd multiple -r option patch. Given that MAPS
and the big-concurrency patch. Seems to
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 11:17:51PM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Sure. Propose a canonical set of patches. About the only thing I
> install, and only on very high volume sites, is big-todo. Oh, and the
> rblsmtpd multiple -r option patch. Given that MAPS
And big-dns, I hope.
Regards,
ber
listy-dyskusyjne Krzysztof Dabrowski writes:
> Why can't we make something like this (qmail-whatever)?
> This way we can port all the exisiting patches that everyone is applying
> these days into one bit patch
> and later on supporters can work off this patch to add more feautres?
> Applying
