Re: 550 User Unknown

2001-02-13 Thread Rod... Whitworth
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:49:37 -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: >> Am I right in think qmail-smtpd will never give this error? > >Yes. However, it should be noted that servers which do return this error >are revealing valuable information -- spammers can use this technique to >build a list of valid

Re: 550 User Unknown

2001-02-12 Thread Scott Gifford
Herbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Am I right in think qmail-smtpd will never give this error? Yes. > As I see it qmail-smtpd will only check the domain of the message to see > if it is valid, ie it will accept any valid username for localhost whether > the user actually exists on the system

Re: 550 User Unknown

2001-02-12 Thread Charles Cazabon
Herbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am I right in think qmail-smtpd will never give this error? Yes. However, it should be noted that servers which do return this error are revealing valuable information -- spammers can use this technique to build a list of valid email addresses, simply by conn

Re: 550 User Unknown

2001-02-12 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 02:29:27PM -0600, Herbie wrote: > Am I right in think qmail-smtpd will never give this error? Yes. > As I see it qmail-smtpd will only check the domain of the message to see > if it is valid, ie it will accept any valid username for localhost whether > the user actually

550 User Unknown

2001-02-12 Thread Herbie
Am I right in think qmail-smtpd will never give this error? As I see it qmail-smtpd will only check the domain of the message to see if it is valid, ie it will accept any valid username for localhost whether the user actually exists on the system or not. Is that part handled by qmail-send? He

Re: User Unknown

2000-11-16 Thread Dave Sill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Following the instructures given on Life with qmail, I am trying to >install qmail using the source codes. So far I a have downloaded qmail >and the two add-ons (daemontools and ucspi-tcp), and followed the steps >up to building (Section 2.5.5 in Life with qmail). > >In

User Unknown

2000-11-16 Thread CB
Hello everyone. I would really appreciate any help that can be offered. First, in the interest of full disclosure let me say that I am a newbie to Linux and qmail. I have managed to install our Redhat 6.1 system and get it connected to our LAN and the Internet. I now would like to set up the

Re: User unknown

2000-09-22 Thread Aaron L. Meehan
Quoting Aaron Goldblatt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > qmail is apparently rejecting mail incoming to the local domain, responding > with user unknown. A friend attempted to send a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (an account I was careful to make sure existed before > running this test).

User unknown

2000-09-21 Thread Aaron Goldblatt
nding with user unknown. A friend attempted to send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (an account I was careful to make sure existed before running this test). His Sendmail produced the following output: Sep 21 21:21:11 got sendmail[4972]: VAA04970: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ctladdr=<[E

Always got like this ? Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown

2000-08-02 Thread Irwan Hadi
20:42:31 -0700 >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Returned mail: User unknown >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >*** This message originated by GCS Client Services *** > >- Delivery could not be made to the following recipients - >Invalid Recipient: MichaelG <[

Re: Returned mail: User unknown * from this list!

2000-07-27 Thread Eric Cox
having trouble here is also probably > defying a few internet standards by the incorrect use of a nonexistant FQDN, > wouldn't you say? > > Brett. > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000

RE: Returned mail: User unknown * from this list!

2000-07-26 Thread Dave Kitabjian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Returned mail: User unknown * from this list! > > > Does anybody else get this bounceback when posting to this > qmail list? I get > it for EVERY e-mail I send to here! And I'm not bcc'ing or > cc'ing to this or > any other use

Returned mail: User unknown * from this list!

2000-07-26 Thread Brett Randall
orrect use of a nonexistant FQDN, wouldn't you say? Brett. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 8:33 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Returned mail: User unknown > > > > ***

[Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown]

2000-07-22 Thread Michael T. Babcock
Why am I getting bounces when the message is indeed getting to the list? Also, who is GCS Client Services? Original Message Subject: Returned mail: User unknown Date: 22 Jul 2000 05:29:39 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** This message originated by GCS

some broken mailer [MAILER-DAEMON@gcs.gateway: Returned mail: User unknown]

2000-07-22 Thread Peter van Dijk
te: 22 Jul 2000 08:30:11 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Returned mail: User unknown To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** This message originated by GCS Client Services *** - Delivery could not be made to the following recipients - Invalid Recipient: MichaelG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (un

Re: User unknown problems when sending out mail.

1999-01-17 Thread Chris Johnson
manent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Connected to 1.1.1.1 but sender was rejected. > Remote host said: 553 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown This has nothing to do with qmail. Ask the people who run the host to which y

User unknown problems when sending out mail.

1999-01-17 Thread Dan Hill
it didn't work out. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Connected to 1.1.1.1 but sender was rejected. Remote host said: 553 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown === End Error I am do not know why this is happening. The test is valid. It can receive mail no problem but can not s