Re: dot-qmail with ./named.pipe == invalid argument #4.3.0

2000-07-20 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
Jay J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 20 July 2000 at 07:00:04 -0500 > So why the FIFO? I'm concerned about spawning many-a-Perl at 2.5MB > each on my lowly P75 DNS/Firewall/qmail box. So the idea of a single > reader is attractive .. > > Is that crazy? Suggestions? (Other than "Pentium II's

Re: dot-qmail with ./named.pipe == invalid argument #4.3.0

2000-07-20 Thread Chris, the Young One
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 07:00:04AM -0500, Jay J wrote: ! Long story short -- qmail wrote to the pipe just fine but justifiably ! barfs at the end. (Uhh, stat call or something?) I think the mailfile() function in qmail-local.c calls fsync() at the end. If my man page is right, fsync() works only

dot-qmail with ./named.pipe == invalid argument #4.3.0

2000-07-20 Thread Jay J
Greetings from a happy new qmail user (first post), ** qmail 1.03 ** linux-2.2.16-:i386-:-:pentium-:- As part of a ritualistic adventure to the edges of qmail sanity, I brazenly created a fifo to be read by a perl "daemon". Using a .qmail file in a real-user's home dir that read: ./inmail.pipe