our new qmail install is started simply by
exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \
qmail-start ./Maildir splogger qmail&
however I've noticed a lot of people using daemontools and supervise.
What are the primary advantages of using supervise?
Our mail server probably handles less than 2000 me
> What are the primary advantages of using supervise?
If qmail (or any supervised process) abnormally dies, supervise will
automatically start it back up.
> Our mail server probably handles less than 2000 messges a day is it
> something I really need to do?
Can't hurt.
> Is there a good docume
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 05:16:36PM -0500, Peter Brezny wrote:
> our new qmail install is started simply by
>
> exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \
> qmail-start ./Maildir splogger qmail&
>
> however I've noticed a lot of people using daemontools and supervise.
>
> What are the primary adva
"Peter Brezny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What are the primary advantages of using supervise?
Among those already mentioned: reliability. You *can't* reliably
manage a service without cooperation from the parent process or the
process itself. Putting the management functionality into the pro
Greg White wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 05:16:36PM -0500, Peter Brezny wrote:
> > our new qmail install is started simply by
> >
> > exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \
> > qmail-start ./Maildir splogger qmail&
> >
> > however I've noticed a lot of people using daemontools and supervis
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Rahsheen Porter wrote:
> I'm pretty positive the latest ver of OpenSSH does this. There was
> something
> on the list recently about it. I think I'm using a patch provided during
> that thread though. (OpenSSH_2.3.0p1)
This off-topic here but you can get a patch here:
http:/
