qmail-ldap performance

2004-06-16 Thread Cesar Garcia
HI all. I know this is not the correct list, but i think that is directly related with qmail-ldap and performance. Due to my problems with I/O in preprocced of high rated mail injection, what is the recomended hardware for an high end server with a lot of mail traffic... for example 10 or 20 ma

Qmail-Ldap Performance

2006-10-25 Thread Eduardo Costa
Hi everyone, what is the best filesystem in linux for a MTA with qmail-ldap? Best Regards. -- .. Eduardo Costa Centro de Comunicações - Instituto Politécnico de Bragança raposo at ipb.pt http://www.ipb.pt/~raposo/ ...

Re: qmail-ldap performance

2004-06-16 Thread Sandro Enomoto
Don`t put all your eggs in one basket. Mail servers consume a vast of I/O process. I recommend that put your qmail queue in a separate system storage using another SCSI card or a IDE disks (in SW RAID 1). Kernel 2.6 has some performace problems with some SCSI/RAID cards, verify if your HW is 100% c

Re: qmail-ldap performance

2004-06-16 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On 16 Jun 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Due to my problems with I/O in preprocced of high rated mail injection, > what is the recomended hardware for an high end server with a lot of > mail traffic... for example 10 or 20 mails in one second with a lot of > poppers and imap connections? Yester

Re: Qmail-Ldap Performance

2006-10-26 Thread Jose Javier Sianes Ruiz
I have tested ext3 and reiserfs, both of them give good performance. El mié, 25-10-2006 a las 17:40 +0100, Eduardo Costa escribió: > Hi everyone, > what is the best filesystem in linux for a MTA with qmail-ldap? > > Best Regards.

Re: Qmail-Ldap Performance

2006-10-26 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 09:17:36AM +0200, Jose Javier Sianes Ruiz wrote: > I have tested ext3 and reiserfs, both of them give good performance. > > > El mié, 25-10-2006 a las 17:40 +0100, Eduardo Costa escribió: > > Hi everyone, > > what is the best filesystem in linux for a MTA with qmail-ldap?

Re: Qmail-Ldap Performance

2006-10-26 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel
On 10/25/2006 01:40 PM, Eduardo Costa escreveu: Hi everyone, what is the best filesystem in linux for a MTA with qmail-ldap? Just for the record, we have been using XFS (since kernel 2.4.18 and external patches) and I don't have problems. Our servers are running Debian Stable and I have

Re: Qmail-Ldap Performance

2006-10-26 Thread brian
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote: On 10/25/2006 01:40 PM, Eduardo Costa escreveu: Hi everyone, what is the best filesystem in linux for a MTA with qmail-ldap? Just for the record, we have been using XFS (since kernel 2.4.18 and external patches) and I don't have p

Re: Qmail-Ldap Performance

2006-10-26 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/26/2006 11:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: > On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote: >> On 10/25/2006 01:40 PM, Eduardo Costa escreveu: >>> Hi everyone, >>> what is the best filesystem in linux for a MTA with qmail-ldap? >> >>

Re: Qmail-Ldap Performance

2006-11-13 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Thu, 26.10.2006 at 10:11:44 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No offense but why are you even running qmail-ldap with that few mail > boxes? qmail-ldap gives me "ease of administration" in a way I've yet to see in any other MTA (though I'm not searching much). Combine