this is the new lines for the fr translation.
231 Pas de liste de diffusion agrave; visualiser
232 Pas d'alias ou redirection agrave; visualiser
233 Pas de robot agrave; visualiser
Bye.
Nicolas CROISET
VDL
http://www.vdl.fr/dab/
Tel : +33 4 72 84 06 04 Fax : +33 4 72 84 06 02
--
IDG New MediaEinar Bordewich
Development Manager Phone: +47 2336 1420
E-Mail: eibo(at)newmedia.no
Lat: 59.91144 N Lon: 10.76097 E
no
I meant to send this to the list...
-jeff
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:02:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jeff Garvas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bill Shupp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: qmailadmin 0.45 issues
I'm exhausting my local resources with this issue, so I figired
I totally agree with this. I am going to have a real bitch of a time
migrating my current email system to vpopmail because of the current
limitation.
Brad Dameron spoke forth with the blessed manuscript:
Speaking of MySQL. There is one feature that should be implemented. There
should no
I vote for this , definitely =)
- Original Message -
From: Casey Zacek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: 0.83 patch
I totally agree with this. I am going to have a real bitch of a time
migrating my current email system
Jeff Garvas writes:
I recently recovered from a hacking incident on a machine running qmail.
We decided to install qmail from scratch, install vpopmail, and then
install qmailadmin again.
SNIP
This is very disconcerting.
Any ideas how this 'hack' occurred ?
What OS/version were you
Not a qmail issue, more likely some mail user software like pine does things
like this.
- Original Message -
From: Randy Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 7:10 PM
Subject: qmailadmin issue?
Have any of you guys ever seen this? It was
Hmm. Thanks for the note. Any ideas as to why it could
have been broadcast to all recipients in the virtual domain?
It got dumped on about 200 folks.
Thanks,
Randy
Tim Hunter wrote:
Not a qmail issue, more likely some mail user software like pine does things
like this.
-
Marvin,
There is -nothing- wrong with qmail and/or qmailadmin.
The hack, as far as I can determine, happened because of proftpd 1.2.1
I'm simply reinstalling qmail and running into quirks because I'm
installing old email back on top of a new install.
I figured out my problem. It was
This is a imap issue. You must be using UW IMAP.
---
Brad Dameron
Network Account Executive
TSCNet Inc.
www.tscnet.com
Silverdale, WA.
måndagen den 24 september 2001 18.03 skrev marvin:
Jeff Garvas writes:
I recently recovered from a hacking incident on a machine running qmail.
We decided to install qmail from scratch, install vpopmail, and then
install qmailadmin again.
SNIP
This is very disconcerting.
Any ideas
on 9/24/01 10:00 PM, Owen Gottschalk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
spake:
Hello,
I am having some problems installing qmail admin.
We are currently using an old version (0.39), and I wish to update to a
newer version in order to be able to modify mailing list options
(specifically, changing a
måndagen den 24 september 2001 22.05 skrev Bill Shupp:
on 9/24/01 10:58 PM, Oden Eriksson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
You could remove all DOMAIN_ADMIN stuff from the source... (I wonder why
it's still in there...)
This would render qmailadmin useless, except for users to change passwords
on 9/24/01 10:32 PM, eko at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
how install and configurations qmailadmin ?..
how install and configurations ezlm ?..
Try reading the documentation. It's all there.
on 9/24/01 7:57 PM, Steve Fulton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
That makes much more sense. In my DB, the gid is set to 0. Is that the
case in all installs? If so, then simply putting a non-zero digit would
indicate admin status.
No, it's not as simple as that. But I already have it
Ken, all:
I've posted a qmailadmin-0.84 candidate:
ChangeLog:
http://shupp.org/patches/ChangeLog
Download:
http://shupp.org/patches/qmailadmin-0.84.tar.gz
Among the changes from 0.83 is a method of allowing non-postmaster accounts
to be domain administrators. A new gid flag (QA_ADMIN,
I agree, it would be very useful -- we have a client who has several
employees they wish to be admins, but would rather have it specifically
applied to that user rather than a general account.
Looking over the Vpopmail source, I do not think it will be that difficult
to incorporate, and update
on 9/24/01 6:29 PM, Steve Fulton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
I agree, it would be very useful -- we have a client who has several
employees they wish to be admins, but would rather have it specifically
applied to that user rather than a general account.
Looking over the Vpopmail source, I
18 matches
Mail list logo