fr translation once again (0.83)

2001-09-24 Thread Nicolas Croiset (VDL)
this is the new lines for the fr translation. 231 Pas de liste de diffusion agrave; visualiser 232 Pas d'alias ou redirection agrave; visualiser 233 Pas de robot agrave; visualiser Bye. Nicolas CROISET VDL http://www.vdl.fr/dab/ Tel : +33 4 72 84 06 04 Fax : +33 4 72 84 06 02

Norwegian translation and minor changes to the no file

2001-09-24 Thread Einar Bordewich
-- IDG New MediaEinar Bordewich Development Manager Phone: +47 2336 1420 E-Mail: eibo(at)newmedia.no Lat: 59.91144 N Lon: 10.76097 E no

qmailadmin 0.45 issues (fwd)

2001-09-24 Thread Jeff Garvas
I meant to send this to the list... -jeff -- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:02:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Jeff Garvas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bill Shupp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: qmailadmin 0.45 issues I'm exhausting my local resources with this issue, so I figired

Re: 0.83 patch

2001-09-24 Thread Casey Zacek
I totally agree with this. I am going to have a real bitch of a time migrating my current email system to vpopmail because of the current limitation. Brad Dameron spoke forth with the blessed manuscript: Speaking of MySQL. There is one feature that should be implemented. There should no

Re: 0.83 patch

2001-09-24 Thread Harri Sydänmaa
I vote for this , definitely =) - Original Message - From: Casey Zacek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 10:09 PM Subject: Re: 0.83 patch I totally agree with this. I am going to have a real bitch of a time migrating my current email system

Re: qmailadmin 0.45 issues (fwd)

2001-09-24 Thread marvin
Jeff Garvas writes: I recently recovered from a hacking incident on a machine running qmail. We decided to install qmail from scratch, install vpopmail, and then install qmailadmin again. SNIP This is very disconcerting. Any ideas how this 'hack' occurred ? What OS/version were you

Re: qmailadmin issue?

2001-09-24 Thread Tim Hunter
Not a qmail issue, more likely some mail user software like pine does things like this. - Original Message - From: Randy Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 7:10 PM Subject: qmailadmin issue? Have any of you guys ever seen this? It was

Re: qmailadmin issue?

2001-09-24 Thread Randy Franklin
Hmm. Thanks for the note. Any ideas as to why it could have been broadcast to all recipients in the virtual domain? It got dumped on about 200 folks. Thanks, Randy Tim Hunter wrote: Not a qmail issue, more likely some mail user software like pine does things like this. -

Re: qmailadmin 0.45 issues (fwd)

2001-09-24 Thread Jeff Garvas
Marvin, There is -nothing- wrong with qmail and/or qmailadmin. The hack, as far as I can determine, happened because of proftpd 1.2.1 I'm simply reinstalling qmail and running into quirks because I'm installing old email back on top of a new install. I figured out my problem. It was

RE: qmailadmin issue?

2001-09-24 Thread Brad Dameron
This is a imap issue. You must be using UW IMAP. --- Brad Dameron Network Account Executive TSCNet Inc. www.tscnet.com Silverdale, WA.

Re: qmailadmin 0.45 issues (fwd)

2001-09-24 Thread Oden Eriksson
måndagen den 24 september 2001 18.03 skrev marvin: Jeff Garvas writes: I recently recovered from a hacking incident on a machine running qmail. We decided to install qmail from scratch, install vpopmail, and then install qmailadmin again. SNIP This is very disconcerting. Any ideas

Re: install troubles

2001-09-24 Thread Bill Shupp
on 9/24/01 10:00 PM, Owen Gottschalk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: Hello, I am having some problems installing qmail admin. We are currently using an old version (0.39), and I wish to update to a newer version in order to be able to modify mailing list options (specifically, changing a

Re: qmailadmin 0.45 issues

2001-09-24 Thread Oden Eriksson
måndagen den 24 september 2001 22.05 skrev Bill Shupp: on 9/24/01 10:58 PM, Oden Eriksson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: You could remove all DOMAIN_ADMIN stuff from the source... (I wonder why it's still in there...) This would render qmailadmin useless, except for users to change passwords

Re: qmailadmin

2001-09-24 Thread Bill Shupp
on 9/24/01 10:32 PM, eko at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: how install and configurations qmailadmin ?.. how install and configurations ezlm ?.. Try reading the documentation. It's all there.

Re: No requirement for postmaster to be default administrator.

2001-09-24 Thread Bill Shupp
on 9/24/01 7:57 PM, Steve Fulton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: That makes much more sense. In my DB, the gid is set to 0. Is that the case in all installs? If so, then simply putting a non-zero digit would indicate admin status. No, it's not as simple as that. But I already have it

qmailadmin 0.84, vpopmail-5.0-qa-admin patch

2001-09-24 Thread Bill Shupp
Ken, all: I've posted a qmailadmin-0.84 candidate: ChangeLog: http://shupp.org/patches/ChangeLog Download: http://shupp.org/patches/qmailadmin-0.84.tar.gz Among the changes from 0.83 is a method of allowing non-postmaster accounts to be domain administrators. A new gid flag (QA_ADMIN,

No requirement for postmaster to be default administrator.

2001-09-24 Thread Steve Fulton
I agree, it would be very useful -- we have a client who has several employees they wish to be admins, but would rather have it specifically applied to that user rather than a general account. Looking over the Vpopmail source, I do not think it will be that difficult to incorporate, and update

Re: No requirement for postmaster to be default administrator.

2001-09-24 Thread Bill Shupp
on 9/24/01 6:29 PM, Steve Fulton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: I agree, it would be very useful -- we have a client who has several employees they wish to be admins, but would rather have it specifically applied to that user rather than a general account. Looking over the Vpopmail source, I