> > Could it be the Keep-Alive timeout/blank header POST problem?
> > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=831167
> >
> > This is the only 'broken surfing' flaw that has bitten me recently
> > with IE.
>
> Ah, now I think we're cooking. Still waiting on a client to get
> back to me
Jack Kerouac wrote:
Further update - results very much do seem to point to something
in how IE does some function or another when using an SSL connection.
There is ssl thing that you can tune for ie in apache.
--
Eero
Mozilla isn't difficult to install (typical next next next next next finish
windows installation), it's 100% free, open source, and is relatively small
I prefer firefox over mozilla. Moz is too bloat nowdays.
--
Eero
> > I have already verified it doesn't happen with any known browser
> >other than the latest IE6 (for sure, possibly older versions as well,
> >but that is un-verified), and then only when running on Windows XP.
> >So it is definitely an IE problem, it's just a problem I'm hoping to
> >find a
Jack Kerouac wrote:
I have already verified it doesn't happen with any known browser
other than the latest IE6 (for sure, possibly older versions as well, but
that is un-verified), and then only when running on Windows XP. So it is
definitely an IE problem, it's just a problem I'm hoping
> > > IE? broken? NEVER.
> >
> > Always! :)
> >
> > > Try with mozilla or opera or some such, and see if the issue shows
> >
> > I have already verified it doesn't happen with any known browser
> > other than the latest IE6 (for sure, possibly older versions as well,
>
> In my opinion,
On Tuesday 27 April 2004 03:35 pm, Jack Kerouac wrote:
> > > It *migh* be the way IE uses ssl, it is broken, I think.
> >
> > IE? broken? NEVER.
>
> Always! :)
>
> > Try with mozilla or opera or some such, and see if the issue shows up
> > there. If not, then you've pinpointed the proble
> > It *migh* be the way IE uses ssl, it is broken, I think.
>
> IE? broken? NEVER.
Always! :)
> Try with mozilla or opera or some such, and see if the issue shows up
> there. If not, then you've pinpointed the problem without any
> additional effort.
>
> http://www.mozilla.org <-- f
On Tuesday 27 April 2004 02:47 pm, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> Jack Kerouac wrote:
> > Well, I'll have to setup a non-SSL'd webserver with qmailadmin,
> > and track down a client who's having this problem, but yeah, I can
> > probably get this done.
>
> It *migh* be the way IE uses ssl, it is broke
Jack Kerouac wrote:
Well, I'll have to setup a non-SSL'd webserver with qmailadmin,
and track down a client who's having this problem, but yeah, I can
probably get this done.
It *migh* be the way IE uses ssl, it is broken, I think.
--
Eero
> > I generally suspect some kind of encoding issue with how IE6/XP is
> > setting up the POST (broken encoding?), and/or how qmailadmin
> > interperts it, or a problem in IE and how it maintains session data
> > perhaps?
> >
> > I've seen that this has been discussed in the list archives,
On Apr 27, 2004, at 12:55 AM, Jack Kerouac wrote:
I generally suspect some kind of encoding issue with how IE6/XP is
setting up the POST (broken encoding?), and/or how qmailadmin
interperts
it, or a problem in IE and how it maintains session data perhaps?
I've seen that this has been discussed
I have identified a problem, without being able to identify the
exact cause and/or fix. So, here I am, perhaps some smarter minds than
mine may have a go at it.
vpopmail 5.4.0 qmailadmin 1.2.0 InternetExplorer 6 + Windows XP.
The IE6/XP combination gets to the "Cannot change to d
13 matches
Mail list logo
