Hi guys:
1 .- Is clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 compatible with simscan-toaster-1.2-1.3.1
?
2 .- Is documentation of implementing the new SRS on the toaster available
somewhere? (an step by step guide will be cool)
Thanks!
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Hi David,
1 .- Is clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 compatible with simscan-toaster-1.2-1.3.1
Not 100% sure. I'd recommend upgrading simscan
2 .- Is documentation of implementing the new SRS on the toaster available
somewhere? (an step by step guide will be cool)
This is what me and Eric found out yesterday:
If we start my toaster with clamav scanning one domain and feed it a
message with an attachment, we get a phantom clamd processes eating
all of my p4 2,8GHz HT CPU. Example:
Top shows:
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME CPU
Hi all,
How can I control which user can send external mail, and some users stays
internal only? Seems like eMPF policy cannot functions anymore.
Thanks
Looking for earth-friendly autos?
Browse Top Cars by
Hi
The pid of your clamd (user clamav) shouldnt change and be listed as
21988 (in your exemple)
as long as you dont restart it of course, and nothign else
I have fc5 and centos4.4 boxes
on very busy machines. I dont have those problems at all
Try launching a top -u clamav
you should have 1
Hi Eric,
In fact you (and others) have not received any replies from this tool... I've
just checked that :(
The problem is that if I deliver the mail directly to your mail servers (as I'd
like to do) it get's rejected because this server is still in a dynamic IP
range - I will change it for
Eric,
The log messages that I have copied and pasted in my previous e-mail were
collected from my test server running clamav-toaster-0.90-1-3-10.
Regards,
Fernando
De: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada: qua 28-02-2007 6:23
Para:
Eric Shubes wrote:
Fernando Azevedo wrote:
Hi Eric,
You should have something like 2007-02-27 22:18:04.077743500
/var/qmail/simscan/1172614683.760056.24955/eicar.com: Eicar-Test-Signature FOUND in your
/var/log/qmail/clamd/current... Also, in /var/log/qmail/smtp/current there sould be
Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
2 .- Is documentation of implementing the new SRS on the toaster
available
somewhere? (an step by step guide will be cool)
http://opensource.mco2.net/qmail/srs/
It's now in the wiki under Configuration.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-Original Message-
From: Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 6:45 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] RE: ezmlm warning
Steve Ingraham wrote:
Below is a message I have been receiving from the
Jake Vickers wrote:
Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
2 .- Is documentation of implementing the new SRS on the toaster
available
somewhere? (an step by step guide will be cool)
http://opensource.mco2.net/qmail/srs/
It's now in the wiki under Configuration.
Thanks, Jake.
FWIW, I moved the link
Hey Fernando,
Yeah, my server is on a pseudo-static address. I finally got a delivery
failure message from my server. It took a while because the rejection is a
4xx (temporary) failure:
Remote host said: 451 Dynamic/Residential IP range listed by NJABL dynablock
- http://njabl.org/dynablock.html
Jake Vickers wrote:
Eric Shubes wrote:
Fernando Azevedo wrote:
Hi Eric,
You should have something like 2007-02-27 22:18:04.077743500
/var/qmail/simscan/1172614683.760056.24955/eicar.com:
Eicar-Test-Signature FOUND in your /var/log/qmail/clamd/current...
Also, in /var/log/qmail/smtp/current
Hey FA,
What do you know? I just got back the --help request from your reflector!
This is the one I sent after I changed my smtproutes for your domain.
FWIW, the time is off. You need to look into that.
Fernando Azevedo wrote:
Hi Eric,
In fact you (and others) have not received any replies
Hi,
On 2/28/07, Philip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try launching a top -u clamav
you should have 1 clamd, 1 freshclam, a few spamc and multiple simscan
commands
clamd and freshclam should have the same PID while you monitor with top
This is what I get. I follow user clamav's processes in top
On 2/28/07, Peter Peltonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After enabling clamav for one domain and sending an email with
attachment to it I see:
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME CPU COMMAND
17742 clamav25 0 47588 42M 1444 R50.1 4.2 1:00 1 clamd
20466
Hello everyone, I have the following installation, and a lot o spam is
passing through, What recomendations do you suggest ?
I am using Centos 4.2
daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.2.9
ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.2.10
squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.5-1.2.13
ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.2.9
Guillermo Villasana wrote:
Hello everyone, I have the following installation, and a lot o spam is
passing through, What recomendations do you suggest ?
If you want to stop/delete it, try some more RBLs in your blacklists
file and also adjust your spam_hits in simcontrol to a lower number.
Hi Peter
32645 is the only pid you should see
did you by any chance try to rebuild the rpm ?
Yes Pentium D, Core Duo and Xenon 5130 machines all with smp kernels
What's your distrib Peter (sorry if you already mentioned it :))
Peter Peltonen wrote:
On 2/28/07, Peter Peltonen [EMAIL
I had to remove several RBLs, because they were making the system very
slow or my users wouldn't be able to send mail, I don't remember if this
versions have the outgoing port? I will try lowering the simcontrol, and
the patch to check if an RBL server is not responding to be skipped.
Jake
On 2/28/07, Philip Nix Guru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Peter
32645 is the only pid you should see
did you by any chance try to rebuild the rpm ?
Yes Pentium D, Core Duo and Xenon 5130 machines all with smp kernels
What's your distrib Peter (sorry if you already mentioned it :))
I have not
Guillermo Villasana wrote:
I had to remove several RBLs, because they were making the system very
slow or my users wouldn't be able to send mail, I don't remember if this
versions have the outgoing port? I will try lowering the simcontrol, and
the patch to check if an RBL server is not
Hello I am setting up Qmailtoaster on a server and will be using another
company's DNS services where I cannot create TXT records. Is it still
worthwhile to install/configure libdomainkeys? Nutshell: are there any
components in Qmailtoaster (for CentOS 4.4) that will not add useful
23 matches
Mail list logo
