Re: [qmailtoaster] restrict some user to send mail only to the same domain

2007-03-31 Thread AM
Hi, Sorry for the late reply, but I've been away... If you haven't setup your DNS as in http://opensource.mco2.net/qmail/srs/, you aren't using it :) In that case it's safe to use empf patch. A M - Original Message - From: Midhun Ramadas To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: simscan-toaster, isoqlog-toaster, clamav-toaster, spamassassin-toaster, qmail-toaster

2007-03-31 Thread PakOgah
Hi Quinn, Nice work. Please submit tickets to http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/flyspray/ so that this can actually be implemented. Thanks, Erik Hi Quinn/Erik, I dont is this also a bug or I did something wrong when upgrading spamassasin dan simscan to latest version first, I remove

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: simscan-toaster, isoqlog-toaster, clamav-toaster, spamassassin-toaster, qmail-toaster

2007-03-31 Thread Eric Shubes
PakOgah wrote: Hi Quinn, Nice work. Please submit tickets to http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/flyspray/ so that this can actually be implemented. Thanks, Erik Hi Quinn/Erik, I dont is this also a bug or I did something wrong when upgrading spamassasin dan simscan to latest version

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: simscan-toaster, isoqlog-toaster, clamav-toaster, spamassassin-toaster, qmail-toaster

2007-03-31 Thread PakOgah
first, I remove spamassassin (according qmailtoaster web) rpm -e spamassassin-toaster then I install spamassasin rpm -Uvh spamassasin-toaster-* then I upgrade simscan rpm -Uvh simscan-toaster-* but I wonder why SA version is diff. when I check the header?? see below.. Received: by

Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: simscan-toaster, isoqlog-toaster, clamav-toaster, spamassassin-toaster, qmail-toaster

2007-03-31 Thread PakOgah
first, I remove spamassassin (according qmailtoaster web) rpm -e spamassassin-toaster then I install spamassasin rpm -Uvh spamassasin-toaster-* then I upgrade simscan rpm -Uvh simscan-toaster-* but I wonder why SA version is diff. when I check the header?? see below.. Received: by

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamd memory hog

2007-03-31 Thread John
John wrote: Erik A. Espinoza wrote: Another box shows about 28000 for VSZ, compared to 156556 here. Any suggestions on why it's taking so much memory? Any suggested solutions? Does one have a higher load due to more e-mail being processed than the other? Do the machines have a

[qmailtoaster] Qmailtoaster on Secondary IP Address

2007-03-31 Thread Ron Allison
I am running qmailtoaster on a hosted Centos server that has 5 IP addressed bound to the same NIC. I would like to run the qmailtoaster with the 2nd IP address configured in the alias eth0:0, call it 192.168.1.2 (not the real addresss). Call the first IP address configured in eth0

Re: [qmailtoaster] Qmailtoaster on Secondary IP Address

2007-03-31 Thread Jake Vickers
Ron Allison wrote: I am running qmailtoaster on a hosted Centos server that has 5 IP addressed bound to the same NIC. I would like to run the qmailtoaster with the 2nd IP address configured in the alias eth0:0, call it 192.168.1.2 (not the real addresss). Call the first IP address

Re: [qmailtoaster] Qmailtoaster on Secondary IP Address

2007-03-31 Thread Ryan Gibbons
Ron Allison wrote: I am running qmailtoaster on a hosted Centos server that has 5 IP addressed bound to the same NIC. I would like to run the qmailtoaster with the 2nd IP address configured in the alias eth0:0, call it 192.168.1.2 (not the real addresss). Call the first IP address