[qmailtoaster] Opinions wanted

Hey all, What are some suggestions for a post install script that could be ran to further harden a toaster system? This is something that I think I can contribute if you guys give me a list of things you think you would like to see the script install/setup. Or is it good the way it is a

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam Dyke

All true. You can subscribe to the spamdyke mailing list here: http://spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users -- Sam Clippinger Joseph Lundgren wrote: Yup. I’m using it solely for the logging capabilities that it adds, so I can’t really commentate authoritatively on its effec

Re: [qmailtoaster] Unwanted Login Attempts

Found this... http://www.aczoom.com/cms/faq/blockhosts#q_293 On 8/8/07, Kyle Quillen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes please do provide more info. > > Thanks > Q > > > -Original Message- > From: George Toft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 8:00 PM > To: qm

RE: [qmailtoaster] Unwanted Login Attempts

Yes please do provide more info. Thanks Q -Original Message- From: George Toft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 8:00 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Unwanted Login Attempts Please provide more information. George Toft, CI

RE: [qmailtoaster] Submission port

I checked out that before and there we no errors. Of course I requested that the ip be taken off of the blacklist it was on. I ran the command Cat | grep [EMAIL PROTECTED] current It pulled all of that user logs but there were no errors So I am not sure what happened. The submission port w

Re: [qmailtoaster] Unwanted Login Attempts

Please provide more information. George Toft, CISSP, MSIS 623-203-1760 Harry Zink wrote: Install BlockHosts - it takes care of these kind of hack attempts really fast. Harry On Aug 7, 2007, at 6:04 PM, George Toft wrote: If you offer POP service to the Internet, this is going to happen

Re: [qmailtoaster] switchover

One more tip: Make sure your reverse DNS for your new server is set up. Comcast and AOL reject mail that does not have reverse DNS set up correctly. See http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/421dnsnr.html George Toft, CISSP, MSIS 623-203-1760 Naveen wrote: Dear list, Presently my co

Re: [qmailtoaster] Submission port

The logs should be in /var/log/qmail/submission/current, unless you set up your own port 587. If you created your own you may have carried over a few things like rblsmtpd that shouldn't be there. Erik On 8/8/07, Kyle Quillen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have tried to find the area in the logs a

RE: [qmailtoaster] Submission port

I have tried to find the area in the logs and can't seem to. I am going to try and replicate and then it will hopefully be in there for that user and email. Thanks Q -Original Message- From: Erik A. Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 6:03 PM To: qmailt

Re: [qmailtoaster] Submission port

What error message are you getting in the log? Erik On 8/8/07, Kyle Quillen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Yep smtp auth is on. It's like the submission port is still using the > Blacklists. > > > > Thanks > > Q > > > > > > > > > From: Helmut Fritz [mailto

[qmailtoaster] Is this still a valid list

Of perl modules that need installed? I pulled this from an email back on the 7th of January I don't think I have the time or energy to handle rpm's for every perl module used by SpamAssassin for every distribution we support. For those that can, use RPMForge, for those distros not covered you'll

RE: [qmailtoaster] Submission port

Yep smtp auth is on. It's like the submission port is still using the Blacklists. Thanks Q _ From: Helmut Fritz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 4:33 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Submission port smtp auth

RE: [qmailtoaster] Submission port

smtp auth turned on in the client software? i just switched some users to submission port and it is working great... _ From: Kyle Quillen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 1:10 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Submission port

[qmailtoaster] Submission port

Hey all, Got a small issue. I have addresses that check email from remote networks and then I have a few ips that get blacklisted from time to time for whatever the reason. I hate SORBS. Anyways I have them set their outgoing port to 587 and they can telnet to that port but the server still

Re: [qmailtoaster] heavy load for latest clamav and spamd?

Hello I have very busy smtp servers using clamav 0.91.1 When I combined it with spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.8 all is working fine When I did combine it with spamassassin-toaster-3.2.2-1.3.11 the scanning time increased badly and all mails got tagged with RDNS_NONE The reason is : There was

Re: [qmailtoaster] heavy load for latest clamav and spamd?

L. A. wrote: Is there anybody who try latest clamav 0.91.1 or spamassasin 3.2.2 that live on devel site under heavy load? I have load approx 1-3 messages per day at send or receive. And clamav 0 88 and spamd 3.1.8 works great, but for now i saw that clamd cannot use all viruses that f

Re: [qmailtoaster] heavy load for latest clamav and spamd?

Greetings, > Are you using clamav 0.91.1 without any changes in configs that comes with > src.rpm (disable ole\pdf scan or enabling experimental code)? I am running ClamAV exactly as it is on the dev site. > And is there any plans for moving it on main site (and squirrel webmail too > :) )?

Re: [qmailtoaster] heavy load for latest clamav and spamd?

ok, looks like better choose spamd 3.1 branch for me. If i think correctly on this new machine amount of messages can be hier upto two times (~60-70K) (much more virtual domains). Are you using clamav 0.91.1 without any changes in configs that comes with src.rpm (disable ole\pdf scan or enabl

Re: [qmailtoaster] heavy load for latest clamav and spamd?

I have no issues. I process approx 30K messages a day on some of my boxes. The new spamassassin requires many more perl modules to be complete. Best bet is to either use rpmforge repo and install the perl modules via rpm OR to cpan install them. Without the packages, the load is higher with the n

[qmailtoaster] heavy load for latest clamav and spamd?

Is there anybody who try latest clamav 0.91.1 or spamassasin 3.2.2 that live on devel site under heavy load? I have load approx 1-3 messages per day at send or receive. And clamav 0 88 and spamd 3.1.8 works great, but for now i saw that clamd cannot use all viruses that freshclam down

Re: [qmailtoaster] Blackberry problem

I had problems before with emails coming from ticketmaster.co.uk and some other domains. The chkuser settings are a bit outdated since lots of domains use "strange" characters that ckuser dislikes. And they are allowed per rfc (if i remember correctly). Thats why I disabled the sender forma

[qmailtoaster] ipv6 in qt?

I look into qmail-toaster files ant it looks like there is no any ipv6 patch for qmail inside. So is there any plans to add patch for ipv6 into 1.3 branch (at least for testing purposes for future) or we can see this only in upcoming 1.4 branch? -

Re: [qmailtoaster] Blackberry problem

I'm having the same problem with blackberry users in my domain. I've traced the problem down to a forward slash character ('/') in the SRS-ified To: header in messages coming from blackberry users to users in my domain. Chkuser doesn't like this. I was about to go through the process listed

RE: [qmailtoaster] Remove Delivery/Read Receipt Headers

However I left the request for read receipts from my testing on when I sent this reply to the list. Sorry about that everyone. Eric Webster Enterprise Services 2CheckOut.com -Original Message- From: Eric Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 1:10 PM To: qm

RE: [qmailtoaster] Remove Delivery/Read Receipt Headers

Actually, I think I answered my own question. |formail -I "Disposition-Notification-To:" -I "Registered-Mail-Reply-Requested-By:" -I "Return-Receipt-To:" -I "X-Receipt-Request-Deleted:" |/var/qmail/bin/preline /usr/bin/maildrop -A 'Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster' /etc/mail/mailfilter Eric Web

[qmailtoaster] No X-Spam-Status header

I'm seeing some mail come through my qmailtoasters that do not get the X-Spam-Status header. Most messages seem to be processed properly but some are not. All messages are getting a header like this: Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 11009, pid: 11010, t: 1.3068s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamassasin scan Spam PDF attach

PakOgah wrote: Extract from Securityfocus... Hi, The @Mail dev team have created a module for spamassassin which uses the sa engine to scan the content of PDF attachments and append the spam score to the score of the email message -- and it WORKS! http://blog.atmail.com/?p=61 http://freshme

[qmailtoaster] Remove Delivery/Read Receipt Headers

I once stumbled upon a .qmail file someone had made that would strip out the header(s) used for read/return receipts. I think the only one that really needs stripped is Disposition-Notification-To though. I find these to be very annoying myself and can't find the .qmail file anymore. Would anyon

Re: [qmailtoaster] rcvd from YahooMail-beta problem (is it just me ?)

You are so correct it got your name on qmail-toaster.spec beside big-dns patch this will be another reason to upgrade to latest release. I think this case can be closed Thank you AM, JP * Sat Apr 14 2007 Nick Hemmesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.03-1.3.15 - Add CentOS 5 i386 support - Add CentOS 5

Re: [qmailtoaster] rcvd from YahooMail-beta problem (is it just me ?)

The latest version is allready patched to accept bare linefeeds.. JP - Original Message - From: "PakOgah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 6:07 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] rcvd from YahooMail-beta problem (is it just me ?) A M wrote: 2007/8/8, PakOgah

Re: [qmailtoaster] rcvd from YahooMail-beta problem (is it just me ?)

A M wrote: 2007/8/8, PakOgah <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >: > > just added the bold line into /var/qmail/supervise/smtp/run > > > exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 3000 \ > /usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l $HOSTNAME -x $TCP_CDB -c "$MAXSMTPD" \

Re: [qmailtoaster] rcvd from YahooMail-beta problem (is it just me ?)

2007/8/8, PakOgah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > just added the bold line into /var/qmail/supervise/smtp/run > > > > > > exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 3000 \ > > /usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l $HOSTNAME -x $TCP_CDB -c "$MAXSMTPD" > \ > > -u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" 0 smtp \ > > >

Re: [qmailtoaster] rcvd from YahooMail-beta problem (is it just me ?)

just added the bold line into /var/qmail/supervise/smtp/run exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 3000 \ /usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l $HOSTNAME -x $TCP_CDB -c "$MAXSMTPD" \ -u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" 0 smtp \ /usr/bin/recordio \ $RBLSMTPD $BLACKLIST $SMTPD $VCHKPW /bin/

Re: [qmailtoaster] rcvd from YahooMail-beta problem (is it just me ?)

2007/8/8, PakOgah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > PakOgah wrote: > > I just realize when I try sending email from YahooMail-beta (new > > interface), the email didn't get into my toaster. > > but when I switch back to YahooMail-classic interface, it's delivered > > to my mailbox. > > > > is it just my toa

Re: [qmailtoaster] rcvd from YahooMail-beta problem (is it just me ?)

PakOgah wrote: I just realize when I try sending email from YahooMail-beta (new interface), the email didn't get into my toaster. but when I switch back to YahooMail-classic interface, it's delivered to my mailbox. is it just my toaster ? or do you have the same problem? try sending from yaho

[qmailtoaster] rcvd from YahooMail-beta problem (is it just me ?)

I just realize when I try sending email from YahooMail-beta (new interface), the email didn't get into my toaster. but when I switch back to YahooMail-classic interface, it's delivered to my mailbox. is it just my toaster ? or do you have the same problem? try sending from yahoomail using: dif

Re: [qmailtoaster] Blackberry problem

So I want to add na.blackberry.com:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",SENDER_NOCHECK="1" Jeremy Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote: Yes the problem is the chkuser sender check. You need to add SENDER_NOCHECK="1" to your tcprules file, for either the mailservers from blackberry or for your default rule. JP

[qmailtoaster] Ezmlm probe...

Dear Everyone, How to disable ezmlm probe? Isn't there anybody who knows this? I mean I want to block "ezmlm warning" message... Bilgehan POYRAZ - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted ---

Re: [qmailtoaster] Blackberry problem

Yes the problem is the chkuser sender check. You need to add SENDER_NOCHECK="1" to your tcprules file, for either the mailservers from blackberry or for your default rule. JP - Original Message - From: "Jeremy Towne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 1:56 PM Su

Re: [qmailtoaster] Blackberry problem

This is what the bounce email shows. The following message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was undeliverable. The reason for the problem: 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 571-'sorry, sender address has invalid format (#5.7.1 - chkuser)' Jeremy Towne wrote: I have a user with a Blackberry problem. They can

[qmailtoaster] Blackberry problem

I have a user with a Blackberry problem. They can send email to anyone except there own domain from there blackberry. Outlook and webmail works just fine. delivery status Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] (this is fake on here) Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 (permanent failure

Re: [qmailtoaster] Export Email address and passwords to Qmail toaster

PakOgah wrote: Jake Vickers wrote: Naveen wrote: Hi List, Is there any way to export the present email address details in csv format to Qmail toaster? Right now I am running Alt N MDaemon , from this I can export all users details for all domain in to CSV format. I would like to k