Re: [qmailtoaster] libsepol.so.1 with 1/1/2008 patches for CentOS 5 x86_64

2008-01-09 Thread Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH
Hi Ben, please check http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg14674.html it could be the same issue. Johannes Benjamin O Baez schrieb: Hi, I am running CentOS 5 x86_64 and after a long period of no updates to the OS, I decided to install the latest and greatest

[qmailtoaster] vmysql: sql error[3]: MySQL server has gone away

2008-01-09 Thread Dicky Kurniawan
Hello, I have problem with authentification via ssl, through webmail or pop3s. I found the message in the /var/log/qmail/authlib : vmysql: sql error[3]: MySQL server has gone away Our mail server build on: RHEL ES3 linux with courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.1 vpopmail-toater-5.4.13-1.3.1

[qmailtoaster] Managing Queue

2008-01-09 Thread Jacob Billingsley
Hello All, I recently looked at the number of messages in the queue by using service qmail queue at it shows over 3,000 messages. This number never seems to move much and mail is still going through so it's not a problem. I was just wondering how to deal with this situation, I'm assuming most

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade Centos and Qmailtoaster

2008-01-09 Thread Istvan Köpe
You don't have any comments on my questions? Istvan Köpe wrote: Hello, I have two Qmailtoaster servers running on Centos 4.3 x86_64. I would like install on them to Centos 5.1. Now I have two questions: Based on your experience is there a difference in performance between x86_64 and i386

[qmailtoaster] Tarpit configuration

2008-01-09 Thread Ronnie Tartar
I'm looking to configure a delay to thwart some of the spammers etc... I have set the following in my tcp.smtp file 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1

RE: [qmailtoaster] Tarpit configuration

2008-01-09 Thread Sergio Minini {NETKEY}
Maybe you can have spamdyke do the tarpitting and graylisting for you. www.spamdyke.org It works really great and its been an awesome help fighting spam Regards- Sergio -Original Message- From: Ronnie Tartar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 1:51 PM To:

Re: [qmailtoaster] Tarpit configuration

2008-01-09 Thread Ronnie Tartar
I am reading, but I don't really see how to install it? I see the config file's etc.. But do not see where to integrate into toaster/qmail. Thanks - Original Message - From: Sergio Minini {NETKEY} [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Wednesday, January 09,

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)) solution?

2008-01-09 Thread dnk
Where can one change how often it happens? I have been looking in all of the carious crontabs and seem to be missing it somewhere... I just do not want it to run every hour... I have one machine provided by a client that is underpowered when this task is running (soft rejects for 20 minutes) - and

Re: [qmailtoaster] Tarpit configuration

2008-01-09 Thread Ronnie Tartar
Looking @ it now. - Original Message - From: Sergio Minini {NETKEY} [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 12:58 PM Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Tarpit configuration Maybe you can have spamdyke do the tarpitting and graylisting for

Re: [qmailtoaster] Tarpit configuration

2008-01-09 Thread Phil Leinhauser
Have a look at the FAQ section. The second item in the list is installation. http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/FAQ.html -Original message- From: Ronnie Tartar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:14:58 -0500 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster]

RE: [qmailtoaster] Tarpit configuration

2008-01-09 Thread Jacob Billingsley
Phil, is spamdyke an efficient program? I don't have a very beefy server running qmail and I want to take advantage of spamdyke, but am concerned that it would slow that server down even more. Jacob Billingsley MCR Technologies, Inc. 2674 Kraft Ave SE Grand Rapids, MI 49546 Office: 616-942-7244

RE: [qmailtoaster] Tarpit configuration

2008-01-09 Thread Sergio Minini {NETKEY}
I dont have a great server either, but I didn't notice any problems with mail processing performance. It did reduce almost 90% of the spam through our server. The good thing is that it only requires a line in your smtpd-run script, so if you notice that something is not going well, you can just

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade Centos and Qmailtoaster

2008-01-09 Thread PakOgah
just my opinion. - as long as CentOS still provide update for version 4, I am not planning an upgrade to version 5. - if your server hardware is x86_64 capable why not using x86_64 version You don't have any comments on my questions? Istvan Köpe wrote: Hello, I have two Qmailtoaster servers

RE: [qmailtoaster] Tarpit configuration

2008-01-09 Thread Phil Leinhauser
I'm not running it yet myself but it does look like he made Spamdyke pretty simple to turn on or off. I read through the FAQ section and it looks like he also put quite a bit of thought into performance and safety. I may look into it eventually myself. -Original message- From: Sergio

Re: [qmailtoaster] Tarpit configuration

2008-01-09 Thread Ronnie Tartar
Awesome, great stuff, got it in. Thanks - Original Message - From: Phil Leinhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 12:37 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Tarpit configuration Have a look at the FAQ section. The second item in

Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE

2008-01-09 Thread Ronnie Tartar
I may have lost a few messages, some servers were not able to get to me with my config. I had to remove. my spamdyke.conf file is: log-level=2 local-domains-file=/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts idle-timeout-secs=60 reject-empty-rdns greeting-delay-secs=5 reject-missing-sender-mx

Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE

2008-01-09 Thread Phil Leinhauser
I'm not running Spamdyke but It looks like you have it set to only accept TLS (ssl) connections. If the sender doesn't do TLS it should fall back to normal. Phil -Original message- From: Ronnie Tartar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:54:27 -0500 To:

Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE

2008-01-09 Thread Sam Clippinger
Most likely, spamdyke doesn't have permission to read your TLS certificate. Are you seeing any errors in the maillog on your qmail server? You can also try running spamdyke with the --config-test flag to check for configuration errors. -- Sam Clippinger Ronnie Tartar wrote: Having trouble

Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE

2008-01-09 Thread Ronnie Tartar
Strange, those errors are on other machines. Not on the qmail toaster machine. I ran the configtest, no errors. - Original Message - From: Sam Clippinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 3:26 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE

2008-01-09 Thread Sam Clippinger
Looking at the configuration file you posted, it doesn't look like you're using spamdyke's TLS at all (so my previous comment about the TLS certificate doesn't apply). spamdyke should be passing the TLS traffic through, untouched, to qmail. Are you using the latest version of spamdyke? Can

Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE

2008-01-09 Thread Phil Leinhauser
Well Ronnie, you just can't get any better service than the author himself!! Looks like you're in good hands. Phil -Original message- From: Sam Clippinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:43:29 -0500 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems

Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE

2008-01-09 Thread Ronnie Tartar
Yes, Spamdyke version 3.1.3 downloaded today. Tried default configure, then the --disable-tls, failed both ways. The remote machine is a centos5 64 bit, running the default sendmail sendmail-8.13.8-2.el5 courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.2-1.3.6 maildrop-toaster-2.0.3-1.3.5

Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE

2008-01-09 Thread Ronnie Tartar
Additionally, I was not able to get any emails from the qmail toaster list either. - Original Message - From: Ronnie Tartar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 4:15 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE Yes,

Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE

2008-01-09 Thread Sam Clippinger
OK, I should be able to duplicate that setup to see if I can reproduce your error. It may be a little while before I have the time, however. In the meantime, can you try enabling TLS support in spamdyke to see if this error persists? Inside spamdyke, TLS passthrough is handled differently

Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE

2008-01-09 Thread Ronnie Tartar
I will give this a shot tonight then send update. Thanks - Original Message - From: Sam Clippinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 4:59 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE OK, I should be able to duplicate

RE: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE

2008-01-09 Thread Ronnie Tartar
Ok, compiling without the --disable-tls, default configure, make, install. Works no problem with the tls-certificate-file parameter in the conf file. Just will not work without it. Thanks for the fix. -Original Message- From: Sam Clippinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday,

RE: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE

2008-01-09 Thread Ronnie Tartar
BTW, this is a great program, thanks it is really keeping the spammers @ bay -Original Message- From: Sam Clippinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 5:00 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE OK, I