Hello
you could simply change the TTL to something like 60 seconds
I suggest doing that 24 hours before updating your mx records
if you want to automatically deliver mails from old to new server (in
those 60 seconds delay)
look into smtproutes.
Cheers
Truong Duc Luong wrote:
Dear list,
Kyle Quillen wrote:
Hello all,
My server is currently just getting bombed with smtp connections.
What I would like to do is point all customers to another smtp server
but the down side is that alot of customers use port 587 to send mail.
But alot still use port 25. What is the best way to
Kyle Quillen wrote:
I have been searching the list for a way to rate limit smtp
connections by ip and this looks like what I want but everytime i drop
it into my iptables config it does not allow me to connect on port 25
Centos 5 with all updates
-I INPUT -p tcp --dport 25 -i eth0 -m
Truong Duc Luong wrote:
Dear list,
I'm going to move current qmail server (IP address is 1.1.1.1) to
another (IP address is 2.2.2.2). Here are steps I will do:
1. Setup a new qmail server with configuration like current server.
2. Use qtp script to backup configuration
George Mogielnicki wrote:
As it turns out, to plug in your own script is quite easy. All I had to do
was to place the following in .mailfilter
`/tmp/test/test.pl`
and the mail file is passed in the stdin to the script.
Is there an easy way to enable .mailfilter domain wise? /etc/
Is there a way to disable local-to-local email from being scanned by SA and
Clam? Clam is beating up my server just scanning emails back and forth
between my employees.
Thanks, Kyle. I'll put the fix in the next qtp release.
Kyle Quillen wrote:
I think the last email fixed the issue.
Much thanks
Q
From: news on behalf of Eric Shubert
Sent: Mon 12/8/2008 6:55 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re:
Dan Herbon wrote:
Is there a way to disable local-to-local email from being scanned by SA
and Clam? Clam is beating up my server just scanning emails back and
forth between my employees.
Short answer, I don't know off hand. However,
.) Local email is only scanned by clamav, not SA.
.) which
clamav-toaster-0.94.1-1.3.22
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 1:45 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] local-to-local email scan
Dan Herbon wrote:
Is there a way to
Hmmm, that one should be ok.
You can turn off clamav scanning in the /var/qmail/control/simcontrol
file seletively by domain or destination address, but I don't know off
hand how you'd identify inter- vs intra- domain messages. You might want
to have a look into simscan.
If your local users
See response below; Eric Shubert wrote:
Dan Herbon wrote:
Is there a way to disable local-to-local email from being scanned by SA
and Clam? Clam is beating up my server just scanning emails back and
forth between my employees.
Short answer, I don't know off hand. However,
.) Local email is
rpm masters/gracious volunteers,
I would like to humbly request an update for squirrelmail. We toasters
are on version 1.4.15 as the most current version available to us. The
SM team rolled version 1.4.17 out 12/03/08. This version apparently
resolves CVE-2008-2379, a XSS vulnerability
Kent Busbee wrote:
See response below; Eric Shubert wrote:
Dan Herbon wrote:
Is there a way to disable local-to-local email from being scanned by SA
and Clam? Clam is beating up my server just scanning emails back and
forth between my employees.
Short answer, I don't know off hand. However,
13 matches
Mail list logo
