Good point Eric... I didn't think of this, since I'm not yet using the QMT
in production yet, and am still using Qmailrocks (Is that a 4 letter word
around here? :-) ) w/Spamdyke set to handle TLS directly...So, in my case,
only Spamdyke is handling TLS, since my Qmail doesn't support it. (I don
Thanks, Michael. I agree.
I just happened to think of this as I was communicating with Sam about
adding an option to spamdyke which will require TLS before
authentication. Would be a nice enhancement. Dovecot can do this.
Michael Colvin wrote:
Good point Eric... I didn't think of this, sinc
Rafael Andrade wrote:
Hello all,
Im using qmailtoaster two years a go, and i`m very satisfied...
some days a go my users receiving lots of spams, Tagged in subjects
(spamassassin) or not.
What could I be making to get better?
Actually im using Qmailtoaster + Spamdyke with greylist.
Excuse f
W dniu 05.11.2009 20:02, Eric Shubert pisze:
I just came across what I think is a possible hole in spamdyke's
configuration.
I've been reading through the documentation regarding TLS, and it
appears that with no "tls-level" option specified, if a spammer were
to use TLS (advertised by qmail
See response below; Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
> W dniu 05.11.2009 20:02, Eric Shubert pisze:
>>
>> I just came across what I think is a possible hole in spamdyke's
>> configuration.
>>
>> I've been reading through the documentation regarding TLS, and it
>> appears that with no "tls-level" option
Kent Busbee wrote:
See response below; Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
W dniu 05.11.2009 20:02, Eric Shubert pisze:
I just came across what I think is a possible hole in spamdyke's
configuration.
I've been reading through the documentation regarding TLS, and it
appears that with no "tls-level" opt
Anil Aliyan wrote:
Ok Jake,
So can we conclude here that all settings in my mail server and dns
are correct ???
Anil Aliyan
From here they look correct. The issue will be with the other server's
DNS. I know when I implemented DKIM that Yahoo took a few days to
correctly resolve the rec
nicole thomson wrote:
here it is jake
tcp.smtp
#cat /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",SENDER_NOCHECK=""
192.168.25.:allow,SENDER_NOCHECK=""
172.16.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",SENDER_NOCHECK=""
216.9.253.191,allow,RBLSMTPD="-rblsmtpd deny: take your spam elsewhere!"
:allow,BADMIMETYPE
Hello list,
I have a client who is trying to send email using his blackberry to
addresses on the qmailtoaster and is getting the following 'chkuser'
rejection:
<<
-Original Message-
From: "Mail Delivery System"
Date: 05 Nov 2009 22:12:10
To:
Subject: Delivery Status Notific
Eric Broch wrote:
Hello list,
I have a client who is trying to send email using his blackberry to
addresses on the qmailtoaster and is getting the following 'chkuser'
rejection:
<<
-Original Message-
From: "Mail Delivery System"
Date: 05 Nov 2009 22:12:10
To:
Subject:
I thought of adding blackberry ip's in tcp.smtp? but con side is how many ip's
we can trace and add it?
there is a posting sometime back when i googled gave those ip's, but i wasnt
sure, whether i can add it or not.
jake, thanks for this hint.
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 22:54:05 -0500
From: j...@q
at present i did stopped the spamdyke, (close to 3 months it was not in use
because of some SPAM tag issues)
i did used the default settings it provides when we install it.
> From: mcol...@norcalisp.com
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:58:50 -0800
> Subject:
jake which log file i need to paste it here? smtp or spamd?
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 22:29:23 -0500
From: j...@qmailtoaster.com
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam issues
nicole thomson wrote:
here
it is jake
tcp.smtp
#cat /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.
from smtp
@40004af3c9c62ff93254 simscan:[16170]:SPAM REJECT (16.30/12.00):25.1791s:We
Provide Nice Choice Of Affordable
Soft.:222.254.140.77:mole...@rgleq.com:mydomainu...@mydomain.com:
@40004af3c9c62ff99014 qmail-smtpd: qq hard reject (Your email is considered
spam (16.30 spam-hits))
14 matches
Mail list logo
