Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Virtual QMT

2010-02-09 Thread Bharath Chari
On 2/10/2010 7:50 AM, Jake Vickers wrote: One of the setups I was working on was Xen, but there is one running ESX. They have 500 users, all using IMAP, and some users experience 8-10 minute lags in accessing their imap stores (or webmail). This isn't directly related to the topic on hand, but

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: question about simscan, clamd and qmail

2010-02-09 Thread Aleksander Podsiadły
Dnia 2010-02-09, o godz. 09:06:06 Eric Shubert napisał(a): > Good guess Aleksander. > > I think I'd ask the clamav community about this. > > Please keep us apprised of what you find. The answer is simpler, this virus was added to clamav database 2010-02-09 14:34 +0100 http://lurker.clamav.net/m

Re: [qmailtoaster] Logs

2010-02-09 Thread PakOgah
Ariel wrote: hola lista,, necesito algun script para la consola o via web, donde pueda de forma simple ver los log de qmail, ya que veo que hay un monton de archivos en la carpeta de log, la idea es que me lea todos los archivos juntos hello list, I need some script to the console or via web,

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Security

2010-02-09 Thread PakOgah
Eric Shubert wrote: As you're aware, there is some tuning involved with VMs. Please visit the wiki vmware page (http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/VMware) and let us know what you think. It's presently under construction, but I think Phil and I have a good start on it. it's great, I'll l

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Memory dan Email stats

2010-02-09 Thread PakOgah
Eric Shubert wrote: Have you applied Jake's change for the simscan working directory? No I haven't. But will look into You don't need more ram. Your swap file is virtually unused, and there is 1.2G cached i/o. As your processes require more ram, linux will reduce the i/o cache to accommodate

[qmailtoaster] Re: Virtual QMT

2010-02-09 Thread Eric Shubert
Jake Vickers wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: Phil Leinhauser wrote: Is there anything like a load tester for QMT to mimic the 500 user limit? I don't know of one. (Doesn't mean there isn't one) It'd be nice to have a testing harness of some sort for QMT. Anyone up for writing one? One of t

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Virtual QMT

2010-02-09 Thread Jake Vickers
Eric Shubert wrote: Phil Leinhauser wrote: Is there anything like a load tester for QMT to mimic the 500 user limit? I don't know of one. (Doesn't mean there isn't one) It'd be nice to have a testing harness of some sort for QMT. Anyone up for writing one? One of the setups I was worki

[qmailtoaster] Re: Logs

2010-02-09 Thread Eric Shubert
Ariel wrote: hola lista,, necesito algun script para la consola o via web, donde pueda de forma simple ver los log de qmail, ya que veo que hay un monton de archivos en la carpeta de log, la idea es que me lea todos los archivos juntos hello list, I need some script to the console or via web,

[qmailtoaster] Logs

2010-02-09 Thread Ariel
hola lista,, necesito algun script para la consola o via web, donde pueda de forma simple ver los log de qmail, ya que veo que hay un monton de archivos en la carpeta de log, la idea es que me lea todos los archivos juntos hello list, I need some script to the console or via web, where you can

[qmailtoaster] Re: Virtual QMT

2010-02-09 Thread Eric Shubert
Phil Leinhauser wrote: Is there anything like a load tester for QMT to mimic the 500 user limit? I don't know of one. (Doesn't mean there isn't one) It'd be nice to have a testing harness of some sort for QMT. Anyone up for writing one? -- -Eric 'shubes'

[qmailtoaster] Virtual QMT

2010-02-09 Thread Phil Leinhauser
Sorry 'bout that.  Never used threaded view... So, I restarted this one and added below... Sorry, Phil. I posted reply to Jake before I read this. BTW, when you change a thread, please create a new message (copy/paste content as appropriate) instead of replying and changing the subject. When

[qmailtoaster] Re: question about simscan, clamd and qmail

2010-02-09 Thread Eric Shubert
Good guess Aleksander. I think I'd ask the clamav community about this. Please keep us apprised of what you find. Michiel van Es wrote: Hi, Today I received a suspicious report.zip file with a report.exe attachement. At first I thought that clamav is not up to date: checked it: works and is

[qmailtoaster] Re: Virtual QMT

2010-02-09 Thread Eric Shubert
Sorry, Phil. I posted reply to Jake before I read this. BTW, when you change a thread, please create a new message (copy/paste content as appropriate) instead of replying and changing the subject. When you look at messages in threaded view (nice feature btw), this isn't a new thread, only a ch

Re: [qmailtoaster] question about simscan, clamd and qmail

2010-02-09 Thread Michiel van Es
Hi Is set to scan Archive. Regards Michiel van Es Op 9 feb 2010 om 16:17 heeft Aleksander Podsiadły l> het volgende geschreven:\ Dnia 2010-02-09, o godz. 15:13:29 Michiel van Es napisał(a): @40004b71693e2c0f617c /var/qmail/simscan/1265723700.530689.31662/report.zip: OK Any help is mu

[qmailtoaster] Re: Security

2010-02-09 Thread Eric Shubert
Jake Vickers wrote: Phil Leinhauser wrote: I think you might be talking about vmware in general? This was mainly talking about doing snapshots in VM. Yes, I was. That's what you get from a thread-hijacker! ;) -

Re: [qmailtoaster] question about simscan, clamd and qmail

2010-02-09 Thread Aleksander Podsiadły
Dnia 2010-02-09, o godz. 15:13:29 Michiel van Es napisał(a): > @40004b71693e2c0f617c > /var/qmail/simscan/1265723700.530689.31662/report.zip: OK > > Any help is much appreciated as I don't want any virusses slipping > through :) Maybe zip archive is not scanned. Check config option "ScanA

[qmailtoaster] question about simscan, clamd and qmail

2010-02-09 Thread Michiel van Es
Hi, Today I received a suspicious report.zip file with a report.exe attachement. At first I thought that clamav is not up to date: checked it: works and is up to date: [r...@pcintelw01 clamd]# freshclam ClamAV update process started at Tue Feb 9 15:09:10 2010 main.cvd is up to date (version: 5

[qmailtoaster] Virtual QMT

2010-02-09 Thread Phil Leinhauser
So let's change the thread and explore yours a bit... I'd be interested in where virtual QMTs choke.  Is it IO, proc, mem?  Maybe too many other guests? While I only have about 1/2 of your 500 user choke point, I get very good performance from my VM server based QMT.  I did have issues before I

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Security

2010-02-09 Thread Jake Vickers
Phil Leinhauser wrote: I think you might be talking about vmware in general? This was mainly talking about doing snapshots in VM. Yes, I was. That's what you get from a thread-hijacker! ;) - Qmailtoaster is