On 04/12/2010 01:46 AM, Aleksander Podsiadły wrote:
Dnia 2010-04-11, nie o godzinie 17:17 -0400, Jake Vickers pisze:
On 04/11/2010 03:28 PM, Catalin Leanca wrote:
Install on CentOS 5.4
When building i used "rpmbuid --rebuild --with cnt50 clamav"
No modification of spec file.
The p
Dnia 2010-04-11, nie o godzinie 17:17 -0400, Jake Vickers pisze:
> On 04/11/2010 03:28 PM, Catalin Leanca wrote:
> > Install on CentOS 5.4
> > When building i used "rpmbuid --rebuild --with cnt50 clamav"
> > No modification of spec file.
> > The problem is freshclam.conf file that came with thi
spamdyke is not installed.
On 12.04.2010 02:25, Eric Shubert wrote:
Istvan Köpe wrote:
caching-nameserver is installed and it works.
The resolv.conf is:
nameserver 127.0.0.1
The domain names are resolved.
Yes, but how quickly? New names, not cached ones.
How can I know if spamdyke is insta
The speed of the DNS is ok:
; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2 <<>> google.com
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 47613
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;google.com.
Istvan Köpe wrote:
This is my only hint that the problem might be related to reverse DNS:
http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg03155.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg03156.html
is a good follow-up post.
Now I'm thinking mayb
Istvan Köpe wrote:
caching-nameserver is installed and it works.
The resolv.conf is:
nameserver 127.0.0.1
The domain names are resolved.
Yes, but how quickly? New names, not cached ones.
How can I know if spamdyke is installed, because I didn't install it?
You would need to run qtp-install
On 04/11/2010 03:28 PM, Catalin Leanca wrote:
Install on CentOS 5.4
When building i used "rpmbuid --rebuild --with cnt50 clamav"
No modification of spec file.
The problem is freshclam.conf file that came with this new release.
Line 8 and line 17 have to be modified as pointed earlier.
Thank
This is my only hint that the problem might be related to reverse DNS:
http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg03155.html
Now I'm thinking maybe I need to set a port forwarding for port 53
TCP/UDP on the ADSL router...
I.
On 11.04.2010 21:33, Istvan Köpe wrote:
cach
Install on CentOS 5.4
When building i used "rpmbuid --rebuild --with cnt50 clamav"
No modification of spec file.
The problem is freshclam.conf file that came with this new release.
Line 8 and line 17 have to be modified as pointed earlier.
On 4/11/10 6:43 AM, Jake Vickers wrote:
On 04/10/20
caching-nameserver is installed and it works.
The resolv.conf is:
nameserver 127.0.0.1
The domain names are resolved.
How can I know if spamdyke is installed, because I didn't install it?
I.
On 11.04.2010 20:14, Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
On 04/11/2010 04:33 AM, Istvan Köpe wrote
Rajesh M wrote:
hello allo
thanks to all for your help
recompiling qmail-toaster*.src.rpm for making changes in chkuser
my requirement was as such
when my clients use webmail and send emails to say around 50 or 100 users
and even if one of the recepients had a bad email id like a spelling
mis
Jake Vickers wrote:
On 04/11/2010 04:33 AM, Istvan Köpe wrote:
Hello,
Yesterday I installed a fresh Qmail Toaster box on Centos 5.4
according to wiki.
The box works fine, but the SMTP is very slow. You have to wait about
30sec to send a blank message, no matter if you connect from LAN or
fro
On 04/11/2010 11:29 AM, Rajesh M wrote:
hi
i was testing a bit
using webmail ie squirrelmail i composed an email and sent to
hotmail.com
(i understand that is not a complete email id)
i had disable chkuser checks for webmail (and i was testing the email
system) so the email was accepted
i wa
hi
i was testing a bit
using webmail ie squirrelmail i composed an email and sent to
hotmail.com
(i understand that is not a complete email id)
i had disable chkuser checks for webmail (and i was testing the email
system) so the email was accepted
i was expecting the email to bounce back but i
On 04/11/2010 04:33 AM, Istvan Köpe wrote:
Hello,
Yesterday I installed a fresh Qmail Toaster box on Centos 5.4
according to wiki.
The box works fine, but the SMTP is very slow. You have to wait about
30sec to send a blank message, no matter if you connect from LAN or
from the internet.
I hav
I installed Centos minimal configuration, without any additional options
selected. Than I installed only what is required to install according to
wiki, with bind as caching nameserver. After that I installed QTP and ntop.
I guess spamdyke is not part of default setup and I didn't install it.
I l
The traffic is low, about 100 mails / 24h. Although the hardware is
pretty weak, but for this load I guess it should be enough:
top - 15:56:55 up 3:09, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Tasks: 127 total, 1 running, 126 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni
hello allo
thanks to all for your help
recompiling qmail-toaster*.src.rpm for making changes in chkuser
my requirement was as such
when my clients use webmail and send emails to say around 50 or 100 users
and even if one of the recepients had a bad email id like a spelling
mistake in their doma
You have given very little information.
Did you install spamdyke? - this is a delay variable in the config file
Have you looked into logs?
Regards
Alex
On 11/04/2010 10:58, Istvan Köpe wrote:
Sending mail takes long. Connecting from telnet(from anywhere) takes
long. Receiving mail(POP3) is fas
That sounds like something else then.
Connect from localhost, at the very least, should be fast.
Is there already a lot of traffic on the system? What's the load of the smtp
process?
Is there a chance that there is a large number of concurrent smtp connections
already?
Martin
Am 11.04.2010 um
Sending mail takes long. Connecting from telnet(from anywhere) takes
long. Receiving mail(POP3) is fast.
After hitting enter after telnet, I have the prompt instantly, but it
takes about 30 sec to get the welcome message.
I.
On 11.04.2010 12:44, Martin Waschbuesch wrote:
Just to get this clea
Just to get this clear, it is not sending or receiving that takes so long, but
your actual connection attempt via telnet takes that long?
E.g. from hitting enter after 'telnet 127.0.0.1 25' to the prompt coming on?
Martin
Am 11.04.2010 um 11:41 schrieb Istvan Köpe:
> The reverse DNS will be set
The reverse DNS will be set in the next few days.
I also removed everything form blacklists. Even if I change in the
simcontrol clam=no,spam=no and I do "telnet 127.0.0.1 25" it takes 30s
What does telnet 127.0.0.1 25 has to do with DNS or reverse DNS?
I.
On 11.04.2010 12:29, Martin Waschbues
Hi there,
Reverse lookup on your IP is not possible yet?
That would be a VERY bad idea for any mail server.
It is highly likely that in addition to slow performance, a lot of recipients
would block your outgoing mails as phishing or spam.
Martin
Am 11.04.2010 um 11:20 schrieb Istvan Köpe:
> Th
My qmail-toaster is rejecting any e-mail with no reverse DNS record.
Suggest you set it up ASAP.
Regards
Alex
On 11/04/2010 10:20, Istvan Köpe wrote:
The reverse DNS is not set yet. Can this be a reason for the slow
response?
I.
On 11.04.2010 11:33, Istvan Köpe wrote:
Hello,
Yesterday I in
The reverse DNS is not set yet. Can this be a reason for the slow response?
I.
On 11.04.2010 11:33, Istvan Köpe wrote:
Hello,
Yesterday I installed a fresh Qmail Toaster box on Centos 5.4
according to wiki.
The box works fine, but the SMTP is very slow. You have to wait about
30sec to send a
Hello,
Yesterday I installed a fresh Qmail Toaster box on Centos 5.4 according
to wiki.
The box works fine, but the SMTP is very slow. You have to wait about
30sec to send a blank message, no matter if you connect from LAN or from
the internet.
I have the same response if I telnet on port 25.
27 matches
Mail list logo
