Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mailing List Question

2011-04-18 Thread Pak Ogah
Scott, when I check the wiki, it don't have the code. May I edit it? On 04/17/11 4:04, Scott Hughes wrote: Just so Eric won't have to ask me (har har har): http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/How_to_set_up_a_mail_list_so_that_you_can_email_ALL_of_your_domains_at_one_time Thanks, Scott On

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke Question

2011-04-18 Thread Carlos Herrera Polo
Check /var/log/qmail/spamd You will find the message and rules with scores 2011/4/18, Eric Shubert : > On 04/18/2011 07:01 PM, Scott Hughes wrote: >> Thanks Carlos. So what is it that scores the emails before it gets ran >> through Spamassassin? > > Nothing. Spamassassin is what scores the me

[qmailtoaster] Re: Spamdyke Question

2011-04-18 Thread Eric Shubert
On 04/18/2011 07:01 PM, Scott Hughes wrote: Thanks Carlos. So what is it that scores the emails before it gets ran through Spamassassin? Nothing. Spamassassin is what scores the messages. That is where these emails are being scored high. Scott On 4/18/11 8:59 PM, Carlos Herrera Polo wrote:

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke Question

2011-04-18 Thread Scott Hughes
Thanks Carlos. So what is it that scores the emails before it gets ran through Spamassassin? That is where these emails are being scored high. Scott On 4/18/11 8:59 PM, Carlos Herrera Polo wrote: Spamdyke not score email... Only accept or deny the smtp conection 2011/4/18, Scott Hughes: If

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke Question

2011-04-18 Thread Carlos Herrera Polo
Spamdyke not score email... Only accept or deny the smtp conection 2011/4/18, Scott Hughes : > If I have a domain listed in Spamdyke's whitelist_senders, why do at > least some of the emails get such a high score? > > Here is an example that I see a lot of: > > @40004dacb707342c700c simsc

[qmailtoaster] Spamdyke Question

2011-04-18 Thread Scott Hughes
If I have a domain listed in Spamdyke's whitelist_senders, why do at least some of the emails get such a high score? Here is an example that I see a lot of: @40004dacb707342c700c simscan:[10987]:CLEAN (4.50/8.00):4.1731s:***SPAM*** question 2:216.157.241.10:bounce- 338900-137...@l

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: ***SPAM*** RE: [qmailtoaster] Replication

2011-04-18 Thread Scott Hughes
On 4/18/11 7:30 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 04/18/2011 03:00 PM, Scott Hughes wrote: Yes, the path is correct. I double checked that. Also, I can run it from the command line in any directory I am in just by typing “sync-qmail”. Thanks, Scott What are you using to edit the crontab? Have yo

[qmailtoaster] Re: ***SPAM*** RE: [qmailtoaster] Replication

2011-04-18 Thread Eric Shubert
On 04/18/2011 03:00 PM, Scott Hughes wrote: Yes, the path is correct. I double checked that. Also, I can run it from the command line in any directory I am in just by typing “sync-qmail”. Thanks, Scott What are you using to edit the crontab? Have you tried restarting cron? -- -Eric 'shubes'

[qmailtoaster] RE: ***SPAM*** RE: [qmailtoaster] Replication

2011-04-18 Thread Scott Hughes
Yes, the path is correct. I double checked that. Also, I can run it from the command line in any directory I am in just by typing "sync-qmail". Thanks, Scott From: Helmut Fritz [mailto:hel...@phpwebservices.com] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 4:12 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Replication

2011-04-18 Thread Scott Hughes
-Original Message- From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 4:03 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Replication On 04/18/2011 01:57 PM, Scott Hughes wrote: > *From:*Scott Hughes [mailto:sc...@renshawauto.net] > *Sent:* Mon

RE: [qmailtoaster] Replication

2011-04-18 Thread Helmut Fritz
Is your /usr/bin/unison path correct? From: Scott Hughes [mailto:sc...@renshawauto.net] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 1:58 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Replication From: Scott Hughes [mailto:sc...@renshawauto.net] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 3:37

[qmailtoaster] Re: Replication

2011-04-18 Thread Eric Shubert
On 04/18/2011 01:57 PM, Scott Hughes wrote: *From:*Scott Hughes [mailto:sc...@renshawauto.net] *Sent:* Monday, April 18, 2011 3:37 PM *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Subject:* RE: [qmailtoaster] Replication *From:*Scott Hughes [mailto:sc...@renshawauto.net] *Sent:* Monday, April 18, 20

Re: [qmailtoaster] Replication

2011-04-18 Thread Cecil Yother, Jr.
At first glance it sounds like a syntax error. On 04/18/2011 01:57 PM, Scott Hughes wrote: *From:*Scott Hughes [mailto:sc...@renshawauto.net] *Sent:* Monday, April 18, 2011 3:37 PM *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Subject:* RE: [qmailtoaster] Replication *From:*Scott Hughes [mailto:sc

RE: [qmailtoaster] Replication

2011-04-18 Thread Scott Hughes
From: Scott Hughes [mailto:sc...@renshawauto.net] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 3:37 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Replication From: Scott Hughes [mailto:sc...@renshawauto.net] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 2:51 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com S

[qmailtoaster] SOLVED! RE: [qmailtoaster] CHKUSR question

2011-04-18 Thread Scott Hughes
I solved this by adding "SENDER_NOCHECK="1"," to my tcp.smtp file. Found it here: http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/QMail-Toaster:FAQ#I_keep_getting_.225 .1.0_-_Unknown_address_error_571-.27sorry.2C_sender_address_has_invalid_form at_.28.235.7.1_-_chkuser.29.27.22_errors.2C_especially_from_pe

RE: [qmailtoaster] Replication

2011-04-18 Thread Scott Hughes
From: Scott Hughes [mailto:sc...@renshawauto.net] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 2:51 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Replication This must just be my weekend and week for email fun! This weekend I spent both days setting up a second email server and getting

[qmailtoaster] Replication

2011-04-18 Thread Scott Hughes
This must just be my weekend and week for email fun! This weekend I spent both days setting up a second email server and getting replication going per Jake's video. Mostly went well, but I did have some issues with Unison. I had to run it multiple times for it to sync all of the domains/users

RE: [qmailtoaster] CHKUSR question

2011-04-18 Thread Scott Hughes
From: Tonix (Antonio Nati) [mailto:to...@interazioni.it] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 2:13 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] CHKUSR question Il 18/04/2011 20:51, Scott Hughes ha scritto: I have one Blackberry user on my QMT server. He is having an issue w

RE: [qmailtoaster] Blocking question

2011-04-18 Thread Scott Hughes
I'll try that. Thanks! Thanks, Scott From: Carlos Herrera Polo [mailto:carlos.herrerap...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 2:07 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Blocking question In file blacklist_rdns, add the line : .info And in the fil

Re: [qmailtoaster] CHKUSR question

2011-04-18 Thread Tonix (Antonio Nati)
Il 18/04/2011 20:51, Scott Hughes ha scritto: I have one Blackberry user on my QMT server. He is having an issue when he attempts to send email via his Blackberry that he receives back a message from the server that reads, "5.1.0 - Unknown address error 571-'sorry, sender address has invalid

Re: [qmailtoaster] Blocking question

2011-04-18 Thread Carlos Herrera Polo
In file blacklist_rdns, add the line : .info And in the file blacklist_senders, add the line : @info It work for me 2011/4/18 Scott Hughes > What is the best way to block an entire TLD? I tried putting “*.info” in > the spamdyke blacklist_senders file but it does not appear to be working. >

[qmailtoaster] Blocking question

2011-04-18 Thread Scott Hughes
What is the best way to block an entire TLD? I tried putting "*.info" in the spamdyke blacklist_senders file but it does not appear to be working. All we get from the .info domains is spam. Thanks, Scott

[qmailtoaster] CHKUSR question

2011-04-18 Thread Scott Hughes
I have one Blackberry user on my QMT server. He is having an issue when he attempts to send email via his Blackberry that he receives back a message from the server that reads, "5.1.0 - Unknown address error 571-'sorry, sender address has invalid format (#5.7.1 - chkuser)'". Is this (from the

[qmailtoaster] Re: amavis to replace simscan

2011-04-18 Thread Eric Shubert
On 04/17/2011 09:03 PM, Pak Ogah wrote: On 04/17/11 23:18, Eric Shubert wrote: ... I haven't dug into the code to see what actually causes the problem, since simscan will be going away in v2. ;) what will replace simscan on qmt v2? amavisd? ---