IMHO a 32 bit guest consumes less memory than a 64 bit one. Unless you
need to address more than 4GB of RAM you really don't get any benefit
from a 64bit VM.
Proxmox dev's seem to agree with me.
http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/FAQ
Also, the disks should be of type virtio and not IDE. Performance
Do you know what type of mail server this is coming from? QMT perhaps?
That is the only scenario where I've personally observed this problem
(QMT to QMT). It'd be nice to know if it happens on other servers to.
One of these days I might get curious enough to attempt to fix that
bug. It's not a
Eric,
Still receiving lot of spam mails, see the following.
I ran #qtp-install-spamdyke and # qtp-install-sanesecurity
Subject: ***SPAM*** Invoice 384952
Date: 2014-04-23 15:27
From: Sue Mockridge smockridg...@broad-oak.co.uk
To: sand...@miceplanners.co.in
Hello,
Please can you let me have
If you have a backup MX server, check the logs on *that *system. If they
went into that system and were not forwarded to the main system for any
reason, the main system will not have a record of it. (If you think
about it, that only makes sense).
Dan
On 4/23/2014 9:46 PM, Unai Rodriguez
Well as luck should have it ( or not )
The KVM made is actually i386, not 64 bit ( unless I read this wrong )
uname -a
Linux qmail.test.com 2.6.32-27-pve #1 SMP Tue Feb 11 16:18:29 CET 2014 i686
i686 i386 GNU/Linux
I guess I downloaded the 32bit template yesterday
I will do the 64 bit KVM
64 Bit KVM ready
Same Centos 6.5 clean install all updates, qmail installed as per
https://github.com/QMailToaster/qmailtoaster-util/blob/master/README.install
Download here
https://abhostingtoday.com/files/data/public/46fc00f402a246325ccb23787bcf14b8.php?lang=en
Dave M
The default spamassassin rejection value in QMT (spam_hits=12) is fairly
loose, so this message was tagged but still accepted. Check the score on
this message, and modify the spam_hits value in the
/var/qmail/control/simcontrol to be less than that value. Doing so will
reject messages that
On 04/23/2014 11:46 PM, Unai Rodriguez wrote:
Do you know what type of mail server this is coming from? QMT perhaps?
That is the only scenario where I've personally observed this problem
(QMT to QMT). It'd be nice to know if it happens on other servers to.
One of these days I might get curious
On 04/23/2014 11:06 PM, Bharath Chari wrote:
IMHO a 32 bit guest consumes less memory than a 64 bit one. Unless you
need to address more than 4GB of RAM you really don't get any benefit
from a 64bit VM.
Proxmox dev's seem to agree with me.
http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/FAQ
Also, the disks should
We've completed migration of the QMT wiki host to a new home. This is a
temporary arrangement, as we will be migrating the wiki content from the
present Mediawiki platform to the wiki services that are provided as
part of github. I hope this migration will be completed before the end
of the
Original Message
Subject:ClamAV®: ClamAV 0.95 Engine End of Life Announcement
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 20:59:32 +
From: Joel Esler (jesler) jes...@cisco.com
Reply-To: nore...@clamav.net
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-us...@lists.clamav.net,
Hi Eric ;
I would like to contribute to the QMT project. How should a path to follow
? What do you suggest? I'm open to any suggestions, comments.
2014-04-24 3:03 GMT+03:00 Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net:
Would you like to work on implementing this?
On 04/24/2014 02:58 PM, Hasan Akgöz wrote:
Hi Eric ;
I would like to contribute to the QMT project. How should a path to
follow ? What do you suggest? I'm open to any suggestions, comments.
2014-04-24 3:03 GMT+03:00 Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net
mailto:e...@shubes.net:
Would you like to
Eric,
See the headers of this spam mail,
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,
HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_XBL,RDNS_NONE
autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Report:
* 1.6
14 matches
Mail list logo
