Thank you. I will check and get back if stuck with any issue.
Regards,
Atul Paralikar
_
From: Anil Aliyan [mailto:acali...@gnvfc.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:25 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Forwarding outgoing emails to a
Hi All,
We have a requirement in our mailing service, where we would like to forward
all the emails sent or written by any or a particular email user our mail
server to be forwarded to a monitoring mail box. How can we achieve this?
Thanks and Regards,
Atul Paralikar
Thank you Amit. That pretty much answers most of my questions.
Regards,
Atul Paralikar
_
From: Amit Dalia [mailto:a...@ikf.co.in]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 2:39 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dual Delivery
Hi Atul.,
1) Can you
scenarios
given by me when we have few email boxes in Gmail and some in QMT?
- And when you say 'catch-all' account, does it mean you are having
only one account in Gmail?
- How do you handle the spam mails that come to this 'catch-all'
account?
- Atul Pa
Gmail will not be delivered.
The second point I feel can be handled only by using MX records, but want to
know if anyone has attempted it in any better way.
- Atul Paralikar
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 11:14 PM
To: qmailto
s per hour which almost freezed my mail
server.
I hope the above solution helps.
Regards,
Atul Paralikar
-Original Message-
From: Rafael Andrade [mailto:raf...@riosulense.com.br]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 6:18 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Attack?
Yes, I am too facing the similar problem. I am receiving 3 copies of each
mail.
Regards,
Atul Paralikar
_
From: Anil Aliyan [mailto:acali...@gnvfc.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 1:27 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Receiving two copies of every
r for monitoring and controlling SPAM.
Regards,
Atul Paralikar
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mails are still being marked as spam - Reg.
Atul Paralikar wrote:
> Even after applying all the recommendations for the problem addressing
> 2010 date. Mails are still marked as SPAM. Below is the part of the
> header of
-
Received-SPF: pass (mail.etisbew.com: SPF record at elabs7.com designates
208.66.204.244 as permitted sender)
=
Regards,
Atul Paralikar
E: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18005
Thread-Index: AcqrPo53qiyF7ofrQBOXhvPmirfQagAjv0PQ
Please let me know, what am I missing?
Regards,
Atul Paralikar
ng for. look here for instructions:
> http://www.qmailwiki.org/EMPF
> The more recent qmail-toaster releases include empf.
> Dave
>
> Atul Paralikar wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Is there a way to restrict emails sent to outside world to be
>>
l has been authorized by the admin else dropped.
How can we achieve this?
Regards,
Atul Paralikar
ails are marked SPAM
You should at leat fix the faulty Spamassassin FH_DATE_PAST_20XX rule which
had been discussed at the beginning of January in that list.
Johannes
Am 20.01.2010 09:05, schrieb Atul Paralikar:
> Hello,
>
> Most of the emails received from either our internal users or
IBSLKD3pLxna4CBQAs1KSg
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18005
X-Spam-Prev-Subject: FW: assistance remotely making copy application on same
prospects server
Regards,
Atul Paralikar
Sr. System Administrator
Etisbew Technology Group, Inc.
An ISO 9001-2
oaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] RE: Mails not being scanned / filtered by SA
server
Please post your new tcp.smtp file so we can be sure the format is correct.
Atul Paralikar wrote:
> I have added those lines to tcp.smtp file and run the command "qmailctl
> cdb".
>
>
27;s only used for apps running on the same server that might be
submitting email via port 25 without authenticating (e.g. Squirrelmail,
at least the way it's presently configured on the toaster).
--
-Eric 'shubes'
Atul Paralikar wrote:
> Steve / Eric,
>
>
>
>
day, October 01, 2009 9:07 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] RE: Mails not being scanned / filtered by SA
server
Steve Huff wrote:
>
> On Oct 1, 2009, at 10:53 AM, Atul Paralikar wrote:
>
>> [r...@mail qmt]#qmlog spamd
>>
>> 09-14
Vickers [mailto:j...@qmailtoaster.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 8:05 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] RE: Mails not being scanned / filtered by SA
server
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Jake Vickers wrote:
>> Atul Paralikar wrote:
>>> No, the SA serve
qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] RE: Mails not being scanned / filtered by SA
server
Atul Paralikar wrote:
> Actually I read in the forum / wiki, to add a line for the domain which we
> need to allow emails. This will allow us to set other parameters which
will
>
ges? They come
from spamassassin. Is your mail server named mail.providio.com? That's
the host which scanned the message.
Atul Paralikar wrote:
> Hey Jake, the anti-virus on the systems were deleting these mails
> automatically that's why I was not able to send you the header.
>
>
--Original Message-
From: Jake Vickers [mailto:j...@qmailtoaster.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:22 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] RE: Mails not being scanned / filtered by SA
server
Atul Paralikar wrote:
> Actually I read in the forum / wiki
Behalf Of Eric Shubert
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:05 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] RE: Mails not being scanned / filtered by SA
server
Atul Paralikar wrote:
> Actually I read in the forum / wiki, to add a line for the domain which we
> need to
: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 7:40 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] RE: Mails not being scanned / filtered by SA
server
Atul Paralikar wrote:
>
> For your information, my SIMCONTROL file out
How to reset the isologs only for "SPAMD" and "CLAMD"?
_
From: Jake Vickers [mailto:j...@qmailtoaster.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 4:59 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] RE: Mails not being scanned / filtered b
: 1.0
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:20:49 -0300
Reply-To: "Marketta Fjga"
Subject: *SPAM* Did you follow client?
Message-ID: <2060kq.558468e3.097679275426qdwmetjgpphjrbk...@casa>
Content-type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spa
Any resolution for this problem?
]
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 5:24 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: quick question - Reg.
Atul Paralikar wrote:
> Eric, Thanks for your timely replies. I have increased the softlimit to
> 5 and now SMTP started working.
>
>
@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: quick question - Reg.
You'll have to check the list archives, possibly the wiki, for
appropriate softlimit values for x86_64 machines. Unless someone with
that arch can chime in here quickly.
Atul Paralikar wrote:
> When I say "locate lib.so.6
ick question - Reg.
Sorry, here was Jake's suggestion:
You are either missing the libc libraries or do not have the softlimit
set high enough for the smtp process.
Atul Paralikar wrote:
> Jake, can you suggest?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:n...@ger.
t. I think they're spot on.
Atul Paralikar wrote:
> Any alternative? How do I get the server back to normal?
>
> Regards,
> Atul Paralikar
>
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert
> Sent: Friday, September 25
Any alternative? How do I get the server back to normal?
Regards,
Atul Paralikar
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 10:39 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: quick
32 matches
Mail list logo
