2010/10/6 Martin Waschbüsch
> OK,
>
> Please give this one a try:
>
> http://martin.waschbuesch.de/clamav-toaster-0.96.3-1.3.38.src.rpm
>
> Cheers,
>
>
Yes this works.
Thank you!
/p
identifier of the listening
# daemon (main thread).
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> petrus wrote:
>
>> qtp-whatami returns
>> qtp-whatami v0.3.6
>> DISTRO=Fedora
>> OSVER=11
>> QTARCH=i686
>> QTKERN=2.6.30.10-105.2.23.fc11.i586
jCRZE (%prep)
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> What does qtp-whatami show you?
> Try:
> rpmbuild --rebuild --with fedora_11 clamav-toaster...
> (not fc11)
>
>
> petrus wrote:
>
>> Im not all that experienced with running src rpm's, i
Im not all that experienced with running src rpm's, i just downloaded the
srpm and did
r...@fury:~> rpmbuild --rebuild --with fc11
clamav-toaster-0.96.3-1.3.38.src.rpm
Installing clamav-toaster-0.96.3-1.3.38.src.rpm
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.a6cgpY
+ umask 022
+ cd /root/rpmbuil
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
[..]
>
>>
>
>
> What does qtp-ami-up2date show you?
>
>
> ~> qtp-ami-up2date
New Qmail-Toaster Packages Available:
available: squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.20-1.3.17
(installed: squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.19-1.3.15.noarch)
available: clamav-toaster-0
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
[..]
>
>>
>
> I've seen this problem as well while testing, but haven't had a chance to
> develop a fix. I think it has to do with the unionfs sandbox. Try a linked
> sandbox, and I think that'll work for you. To be honest, I don't want to
> was
Hello
Im trying to do a long overdue update on my qmail-toaster using
qmail-newmodel
However this fails with these messages
Building clamav-toaster-0.96.3-1.3.38 ...
Installing /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/SRPMS/clamav-toaster-0.96.3-1.3.38.src.rpm
Building target platforms: i686
Building for target i686
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>
> Thanks Jake. I won't be able to get to my FC11 test host for a couple
> weeks.
>
> Looks like the stock fuse for FC11 is v2.7.4, and I used v2.8 in my testing
> (wanted to use the lastest I could). Petrus, it looks
running qtp-newmodel on Fedora11, im running into problems with the new FUSE
chroot
[..]
Would you like a unionfs/overlay sandbox? (recommended) [y]/n: y
Using FUSE union filesystem ...
qtp-mount-sandbox v0.3.3
qtp-mount-sandbox - installing fuse-unionfs ...
qtp-mount-sandbox - this could take a
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>
> Then they're being signed.
> I don't know why sa-t...@sendmail.net would report no result. Perhaps you
> should ask them. ;)
>
>
Your absolutly right, i just sent a email to another acount and yes, its
signed.
Ill think ill ask the sendmai
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>
> That looks ok to me.
> If you send yourself an email, do you see a signature in the headers?
>
>
Yea i do
Thats a bit odd?
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>
> Oh yeah. Haven't seen that in a while. Links look ok then.
> Are permissions/ownership ok on the /var/qmail/control/domain and lower
> directories/files? I have them readable by vchkpw group.
>
> Me to, apati.se is the one Iv created but iv
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> $ ls -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 23 2009-09-30 15:49 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue ->
>> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk*
>> $ ls -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk
>> -rws--x--x. 1 qmailq qmail 49K 2009-09-30 15:42 /var/qmail/bi
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>
> What does
> # ls -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue
> show?
>
$ ls -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 23 2009-09-30 15:49 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue ->
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk*
$ ls -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk
-rws--x--x. 1
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Jake Vickers wrote:
>
> Change your tcp.smtp file back to have the % in it instead of your domain
> name, and try again. the % gets expanded when it signs automatically.
> Did you configure DNS?
>
>
My tcp.smtp is now
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/
Hi List
Iv been trying to get domainkeys to work, but even after reading and
following the wiki(and the video) I still cant get my Toaster to sign
outgoing emails.
My /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp looks like this:
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/
apati.se/private"
:allow
>
>
>> also rpmbuild on fc10 uses ~/rpmbuild as root not /usr/src/redhat/
>>
>
> Oh, really??? I've always thought that's where it *should* be. ;)
> I'll need to look into the ramifications of this. I may need to bite the
> bullet and install QMT on a FC11 host myself. That might not be all that
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>
>>
> It appears that you're not running the qtp-config script which contains the
> fix to strip off the .i386 from the package name. It should have
> myver=v0.3.1 near the end of the script. If it does, then it's perhaps not
> in the right pl
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> petrus wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Stopping freshclam:[FAILED]
>> qtp-build-rpms v0.3.1
>> qtp-remove-pkgs v0.3.1
>> ls: cannot access /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/*: N
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>
>>
>>
> The problem with building aufs appears to be something related to our aufs
> version vs FC10's kernel version.
>
> Hey Justice, can you look into this?
>
>
> The latest qtp-config in the qtp.qmailtoaster.com svn repository should
> fix
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> Thanks. If you'd care to use qtp-newmodel in the interim (I would), just
> comment out the a4_check_dependencies routine near the bottom of the script
> like so:
> #a4_check_dependencies
> and it'll probably run ok. If there is a dependency pr
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> Newer simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.6.i386 is already installed,
>> simscan-toaster-1.4.0-1.3.1 bypassed
>> which is wrong i think?
>>
>
>
> This is a separate issue. When Jake updated simscan, he went from 1.3.6 to
> 1.3.1 in the toaster portion
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>
>>
>
> I guess that shouldn't effect dependencies now that I think about it. Easy
> enough to fix the script.
>
> Can you tell me what directories exist in /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/ on a x86_64
> machine? I'm figuring on simply stripping that off
Hi Eric and thanks for the quick reply
I trimmed the email a bit, hope nobody mind.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
[snip]
> You've come to the right place. ;)
> Looks like a bug. I don't expect that anyone has run qtp-newmodel on FC10
> yet.
>
> The .i386 shouldn't be part
Hi
a while ago i did a install of qmail-toaster using the instructions found in
the qmail-toaster wiki.
Now i want to update and therefore run qtp-newmodel from Qmailtoaster plus.
It runs into problem thou.
Issuing command: qtp-newmodel
qtp-newmodel v0.3.7 starting Tue Jul 7 17:27:39 CEST 2009
qt
25 matches
Mail list logo
