Hi Jeff,
I believe that the qmt version of ClamAV is redundant like Spamassassin.
Why should what already exists be maintained?
Anyway, here's a like to switch from qmt version to epel version:
https://www.qmailtoaster.org/qttoepelclam.html
Be mindful if you use ramdisk for simscan:
https:/
Hi List:
I see in our logs that
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
WARNING: Local version: 0.101.1 Recommended version: 0.102.4
We're using QMT7. What's the recommended procedure for upgrading ClamAV
Thanks, Jeff
3 seconds
>
> smtp/log: up (pid 3807) 1815823 seconds
>
> spamd/log: up (pid 3816) 1815823 seconds
>
> submission/log: up (pid 3808) 1815823 seconds
>
>
>
> If everything is ok, how can I share this RPM? Or the source RPM
>
>
>
> István
>
>
>
&g
source RPM
István
From: Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 10:12 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade on centos 6 x64
After the preceding, next, build the source rpm:
rpmbuild -bs ~/rpmbuild/SPECS
you guide me?
>>
>>
>>
>> What would you recommend in my senario for long term?
>>
>>
>>
>> István
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:*Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, October 19, 2015 4:18 AM
>> *To:* qmailtoaster-l
nd in my senario for long term?
>
>
>
> István
>
>
>
> *From:*Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, October 19, 2015 4:18 AM
> *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> *Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade on centos 6 x64
>
>
>
&
nd in my senario for long term?
>
>
>
> István
>
>
>
> *From:*Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, October 19, 2015 4:18 AM
> *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> *Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade on centos 6 x64
>
>
>
&
dovecot-pgsql-2.0.11-2.qtp.x86_64
István
-Original Message-
From: Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 5:32 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
<mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com>
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgr
fo-2.0.11-2.qtp.x86_64
> dovecot-2.0.11-2.qtp.x86_64
> dovecot-mysql-2.0.11-2.qtp.x86_64
> dovecot-pigeonhole-2.0.11-2.qtp.x86_64
> whtc-qmt-1-1.qt.el6.noarch
> dovecot-pgsql-2.0.11-2.qtp.x86_64
>
> István
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Eric Broch [mailto
nhole-2.0.11-2.qtp.x86_64
whtc-qmt-1-1.qt.el6.noarch
dovecot-pgsql-2.0.11-2.qtp.x86_64
István
-Original Message-
From: Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 5:32 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade on cen
Istvan,
There should be no RPMS with the QMT "toaster" designation on a CentOS 6
machine, they should all have the ".qt" designation.
How did you go about installing QMT on this CentOS 6 machine?
Can you run a couple commands at your CLI?
1) # rpm -qa | grep toaster
2) # rpm -qa | grep .qt
And
Hello,
I want to upgrade clamav on a Centos6 x64 but I have this error:
rpm -Uvh clamav-0.98.7-0.qt.el6.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
clamav-toaster is needed by (installed)
simscan-toaster-1.4.0-1.4.0.x86_64
Can you help me out?
István
Thank you Eric. It's working now.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Eric Broch
wrote:
> On 1/14/2015 8:01 AM, Eric Broch wrote:
>
> On 1/14/2015 2:57 AM, Chandran Manikandan wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have installed Qmailtoaster on this machine and after that if i run
> this command freshclam it
On 1/14/2015 8:01 AM, Eric Broch wrote:
> On 1/14/2015 2:57 AM, Chandran Manikandan wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have installed Qmailtoaster on this machine and after that if i run
>> this command freshclam it's shown clamav outdated. How to update new
>> clamav release on this machine. I hope anyone
On 1/14/2015 2:57 AM, Chandran Manikandan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have installed Qmailtoaster on this machine and after that if i run
> this command freshclam it's shown clamav outdated. How to update new
> clamav release on this machine. I hope anyone could help me.
>
> --
> *Thanks,*
> *Manikanda
Hi All,
I have installed Qmailtoaster on this machine and after that if i run this
command freshclam it's shown clamav outdated. How to update new clamav
release on this machine. I hope anyone could help me.
--
*Thanks,*
*Manikandan.C*
*System Administrator*
Just curious if anyone has seen this problem pop up again after
upgrading to the most recent clam (ClamAV 0.94.2/8839/Tue Jan 6
06:09:27 2009
)? The error was:
supervise: fatal: unable to acquire clamd/supervise/lock: temporary
failure
I had it pop up, after qmailctl stop/start (as wel
whose repistory is that?
EE
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 8:57 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Deciding the problem of clamav it follows,
>
>
> 1) service qmail stop
> 2) rpm -e --nodeps clamav-toaster
> 3) wget
> http://repositorio.zoioroxo.com.br/rede/clamav-toaster-0.93-1.3.18.i386.rpm
Deciding the problem of clamav it follows,
1) service qmail stop
2) rpm -e --nodeps clamav-toaster
3) wget
http://repositorio.zoioroxo.com.br/rede/clamav-toaster-0.93-1.3.18.i386.rpm
4) rpm -ivh clamav-toaster-0.93-1.3.18.i386.rpm
5) qmailctl cdb
6) qmailctl start
made
--
Work great!
Thx Erik!
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Erik A. Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: domenica 20 aprile 2008 20.10
A: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Oggetto: Re: [qmailtoaster] ClamAV Upgrade
1) service qmail stop
2) rpm -e --nodeps clamav-toaster
3) rpmbuild
T gzseek
> 005f1a50 T gzsetparams
> 005f2860 T gztell
> 005f2150 T gzungetc
> 005f2220 T gzwrite
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Erik A. Espinoza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 11:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster]
It must be uninstalled at first, and then build the package. It's unusual.
It's OK now, Thanks!
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 3:15 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] ClamAV Upgrade
>I found this:
&
Thanks Erik, that method worked perfectly for me.
On 20 Apr 2008, at 19:09, Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
1) service qmail stop
2) rpm -e --nodeps clamav-toaster
3) rpmbuild --rebuild --with $OSTAG clamav-toaster-newpkg.src.rpm
4) rpm -Uhv newclamavrpm
5) service qmail cdb
6) service qmail start
E
-
From: "Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 12:01 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] ClamAV Upgrade
> Hi Erik,
>
> Thanks ,but I don't think this problem is about my old linux release version.
>
> Look at this http://www.mail-archive.com/[EM
T gzsetparams
005f2860 T gztell
005f2150 T gzungetc
005f2220 T gzwrite
- Original Message -
From: "Erik A. Espinoza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 11:30 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] ClamAV Upgrade
> Fedora 1.0 is not really supported anymor
r/src/redhat/BUILD/clamav-0.93'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57 (%build)
>
>
> RPM build errors:
> Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57 (%build)
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Erik A. E
LD/clamav-0.93'
make: *** [all] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57 (%build)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57 (%build)
- Original Message -
From: "Erik A. Espinoza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, April 20
Nope, you have to 'rpm -e --nodeps' the old clamav before building the new one.
Erik
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Roxanne Sandesara
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would assume you need to rpmbuild the 0.93 package. Then before rpm -Uvh
> of the new package, you first need to rpm -e --nodeps
1) service qmail stop
2) rpm -e --nodeps clamav-toaster
3) rpmbuild --rebuild --with $OSTAG clamav-toaster-newpkg.src.rpm
4) rpm -Uhv newclamavrpm
5) service qmail cdb
6) service qmail start
Erik
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 9:37 AM, James Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Could somebod
I would assume you need to rpmbuild the 0.93 package. Then before rpm
-Uvh of the new package, you first need to rpm -e --nodeps the old
package. Then rpm -Uvh the new package. That's how I interpreted
those instructions.
Roxanne
On Apr 20, 2008, at 12:37 PM, James Palmer wrote:
Hi all,
Hi all,
Could somebody let me know the easiest way to upgrade from ClamAV 0.92
to 0.93? On the QmailToaster site it says " be sure to remove prior
versions of ClamAV before building this new one, otherwise it will
cause a circular dependency." and I'm unsure how to do that and then
insta
Hi,
Just wanted to share on my experience with clamAV.
Was using clamav-0.90.2, built from source files. Was working ok. Used a
lot of cpu.
Upgraded to clamav-0.90.3. That was a very bad experience. Clamd was
always crashing for me on fedora 01 whenever a html email came in.
Took a gamble
yes. but this was always set. did not have this issue with 0.90.1 and 0.90.2.
On 6/4/07, Erik A. Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you have NOP0FCHECK="1" set in tcprules?
Erik
On 6/4/07, slamp slamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok i think mine is fixed after removing, rebuilding simscan.
Do you have NOP0FCHECK="1" set in tcprules?
Erik
On 6/4/07, slamp slamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ok i think mine is fixed after removing, rebuilding simscan. however i
did get a connect() error on the first message i sent. why is this so?
this happens every single time i stop/start qmailtoast
ok i think mine is fixed after removing, rebuilding simscan. however i
did get a connect() error on the first message i sent. why is this so?
this happens every single time i stop/start qmailtoaster.
2007-06-04 20:25:54.199359500 tcpserver: status: 0/100
2007-06-04 20:35:57.808546500 tcpserver: s
Removing, rebuilding simscan didnt fix the connect(): No such file or
directory problem
it is coz of that :
2007-06-04 19:07:01.995582500 No stats for Database check - forcing reload
2007-06-04 19:07:01.995611500 Reading databases from /usr/share/clamav
Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
Remove, rebuild
Remove, rebuild, and reinstall simscan after you install clamav-toaster.
Erik
On 6/4/07, Philip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey
I had that same issue with the
connect(): No such file or directory
looks like clamd got delayed somehow when it was supposed to start
but it worked fine after
And t
Hey
I had that same issue with the
connect(): No such file or directory
looks like clamd got delayed somehow when it was supposed to start
but it worked fine after
And that 90.3 fixes the problem with the connection dying I had on many
machines with the 90.2
Hopefully simscan will have the fe
Since you rebooted and clamd was running I really don't know what to say
on that one. As long as you did the 'rebuild' thing first and then the rpm
install. Maybe someone else knows?
Chas.
> forgot to mention that machine was rebooted. clamd was running. i
> reverted to the old version and things
Hmmm, mine was a recent full instal where I built it with the latest
clamav and squirellmail packages, so I was only upgrading from clamav
0.90.2 to the newer 0.90.3.
I did these comamnds;
qmailctl stop
rpmbuild --rebuild --with cnt40 clamav-toaster-0.90.3
cd /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/
rpm -Uvh c
forgot to mention that machine was rebooted. clamd was running. i
reverted to the old version and things are working again.
# qmailctl stat
authlib: up (pid 2935) 442 seconds
clamd: up (pid 2934) 442 seconds
imap4: up (pid 2924) 442 seconds
imap4-ssl: up (pid 2938) 442 seconds
pop3: up (pid 2927)
That's got it, thanks.
Chas.
> service qmail cdb
>
> Erik
>
> On 6/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well I've just been able to update with the ClamAV 0.90.3 package (on a
>> CentOS 4.5 box) and all is well so far. could anyone tell me the command
>> to run to get Simscan to
how did you manage to update? my toaster broke after upgrading to the
new clamav 0.90.3.
2007-06-03 21:59:51.388989500 tcpserver: status: 0/100
2007-06-03 22:04:27.781227500 tcpserver: status: 0/100
2007-06-03 22:06:14.848932500 tcpserver: status: 1/100
2007-06-03 22:06:14.848938500 tcpserver: pi
service qmail cdb
Erik
On 6/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well I've just been able to update with the ClamAV 0.90.3 package (on a
CentOS 4.5 box) and all is well so far. could anyone tell me the command
to run to get Simscan to see show the newer version in email headers?
Well I've just been able to update with the ClamAV 0.90.3 package (on a
CentOS 4.5 box) and all is well so far. could anyone tell me the command
to run to get Simscan to see show the newer version in email headers?
Thanks,
Chas.
---
I'm working with QmailToaster Virtual Appliance (CentOS 4.4) and I had same
problem. After reading the Thread and updated the packages with those in devel
branch I solved the question! Thanks!
Byez
Davide
It wasn't that hard. The hard work was done by the ClamAV group.
Erik
On 3/5/07, Peter Peltonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll mention at this thread too, that upgrading to
clamav-toaster-0.90.1-1.3.11 from the
devel site seemed to fix my problems.
Consider this long thread closed :) Thanks f
I'll mention at this thread too, that upgrading to
clamav-toaster-0.90.1-1.3.11 from the
devel site seemed to fix my problems.
Consider this long thread closed :) Thanks for ES and EE for working
so hard to get this issue
solved.
Cheers,
Peter
---
Regarding duplicated clamd log messages, the fix is to comment out "LogFile
stderr" in /etc/clamd.conf (and stop/start). EE will be releasing a fixed
toaster version very soon that does this and also removes the stderr patch.
I can't speak to the other issues.
A M wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've watch
Hi all,
I've watching clamd 0.90 for some time and found a few strange things:
every line in the logs are duplicated (wonder if this has something to do
with new clamd logging support for syslog and a log file?)
in 64bits system (Intel) clamd crashes quite often (haven't had that
problem in AMD
On 2/28/07, Philip Nix Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Peter
32645 is the only pid you should see
did you by any chance try to rebuild the rpm ?
Yes Pentium D, Core Duo and Xenon 5130 machines all with smp kernels
What's your distrib Peter (sorry if you already mentioned it :))
I have not
Hi Peter
32645 is the only pid you should see
did you by any chance try to rebuild the rpm ?
Yes Pentium D, Core Duo and Xenon 5130 machines all with smp kernels
What's your distrib Peter (sorry if you already mentioned it :))
Peter Peltonen wrote:
On 2/28/07, Peter Peltonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 2/28/07, Peter Peltonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After enabling clamav for one domain and sending an email with
attachment to it I see:
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME CPU COMMAND
17742 clamav25 0 47588 42M 1444 R50.1 4.2 1:00 1 clamd
20466 clam
Hi,
On 2/28/07, Philip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Try launching a top -u clamav
you should have 1 clamd, 1 freshclam, a few spamc and multiple simscan
commands
clamd and freshclam should have the same PID while you monitor with top
This is what I get. I follow user clamav's processes in top a
Hi
The pid of your clamd (user clamav) shouldnt change and be listed as
21988 (in your exemple)
as long as you dont restart it of course, and nothign else
I have fc5 and centos4.4 boxes
on very busy machines. I dont have those problems at all
Try launching a top -u clamav
you should have 1 cl
This is what me and Eric found out yesterday:
If we start my toaster with clamav scanning one domain and feed it a
message with an attachment, we get a "phantom" clamd processes eating
all of my p4 2,8GHz HT CPU. Example:
Top shows:
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME CPU
Hey Peter,
How'd it go today? Ready to try adding more domains to clamav?
Let's chat at #QmailToaster.
Peter Peltonen wrote:
> After a restart last evening I've now kept my clamav running over the
> night scanning one
> domain only. Everything seems to be ok and no strange processes visible:
>
>
After a restart last evening I've now kept my clamav running over the
night scanning one
domain only. Everything seems to be ok and no strange processes visible:
$ ps ax |grep clam
26991 pts/2S 0:00 supervise clamd
26999 pts/2S 0:00 /usr/bin/multilog t s100 n100
/var/log/qma
is OK now, though... but I'll keep a close eye on this for
the next few days.
Fernando
De: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada: seg 26-02-2007 22:53
Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Assunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgra
________
>
> De: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviada: seg 26-02-2007 18:22
> Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Assunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock
>
>
>
> Hey FA,
>
> Are you seeing
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > RCPTTO:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
So... everything appear normal now... :)
De: Fernando Azevedo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada: seg 26-02-2007 22:40
Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Assunto: RE: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade
Good news: I found out why messages are being duplicated.
The new output.c module in clamav has a new logg_foreground setting (enabled
in the toaster) which sends log output to stdout. The toaster used to use a
patched capability (still in there) which allows for specifying "stderr" as
the log fil
nf file problem and I
will report ASAP.
Fernando
De: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada: seg 26-02-2007 18:22
Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Assunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock
He
Thanks, slamp.
Me too. I'd love to hear some suggestions, even if they're just SWAGs!
slamp slamp wrote:
> I have clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 with no problems either. this was an
> upgrade from the rc. but i do see duplicates in my log. the oldest i
> have for logs are from 2/14. i am curious as t
I have clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 with no problems either. this was an
upgrade from the rc. but i do see duplicates in my log. the oldest i have
for logs are from 2/14. i am curious as to why the logs are duplicated.
On 2/26/07, Philip Nix Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
>
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
Philip Nix Guru wrote:
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
Philip Nix Guru wrote:
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
Philip Nix Guru wrote:
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
We're trying to get a handle on this problem. If anyone is using
That would be a "yes". ;)
Glenn Remstedt wrote:
> a output from my /var/log/qmail/clamd/current
>
> .
> .
> .
>
> @400045e2d66333c0c974
> /var/qmail/simscan/1172493913.298866.2941/textfile1:OK
> @400045e2fccb37f785b4 No stats for Database check - forcing reload
> @400045e2fccb37f80e
Hey FA,
Are you seeing any duplicate messages in your clamd log?
Is your volume of messages very high?
Thanks.
Fernando Azevedo wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Hope this is of help:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep toas
Philip Nix Guru wrote:
> Eric "Shubes" wrote:
>> Philip Nix Guru wrote:
>>
>>> Eric "Shubes" wrote:
>>>
Philip Nix Guru wrote:
> Eric "Shubes" wrote:
>
>> We're trying to get a handle on this problem. If anyone is using
>> clamav-toaster-0.90-
Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Assunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
> Philip Nix Guru wrote:
>
>> Eric "Shubes" wrote:
>>
>>> Philip Nix Guru wrote:
>>>
>>>
>
a output from my /var/log/qmail/clamd/current
.
.
.
@400045e2d66333c0c974 /var/qmail/simscan/1172493913.298866.2941/textfile1:OK
@400045e2fccb37f785b4 No stats for Database check - forcing reload
@400045e2fccb37f80e6c No stats for Database check - forcing reload
@400045e2fccb37f81
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
Philip Nix Guru wrote:
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
Philip Nix Guru wrote:
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
We're trying to get a handle on this problem. If anyone is using
clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 and is *not* experiencing a problem, will
you
kindly reply and
Thanks Glenn.
Any duplicated messages in the clamd log?
Glenn Remstedt wrote:
> hi,
>
> I've the clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 just installed yesterday on a FC5,
> do not see any problem. But do let me know what you need to see - any
> log-files ...?
>
> G.
>
> On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 10:01 -0700,
hi,
I've the clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 just installed yesterday on a FC5,
do not see any problem. But do let me know what you need to see - any
log-files ...?
G.
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 10:01 -0700, Eric "Shubes" wrote:
> We're trying to get a handle on this problem. If anyone is using
> clamav-
Philip Nix Guru wrote:
> Eric "Shubes" wrote:
>> Philip Nix Guru wrote:
>>
>>> Eric "Shubes" wrote:
>>>
We're trying to get a handle on this problem. If anyone is using
clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 and is *not* experiencing a problem, will
you
kindly reply and let us know?
>
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
Philip Nix Guru wrote:
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
We're trying to get a handle on this problem. If anyone is using
clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 and is *not* experiencing a problem, will you
kindly reply and let us know?
Thanks.
Hello
I am using clamav-toaster-
Philip Nix Guru wrote:
> Eric "Shubes" wrote:
>> We're trying to get a handle on this problem. If anyone is using
>> clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 and is *not* experiencing a problem, will you
>> kindly reply and let us know?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
> Hello
> I am using clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 on 3
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
We're trying to get a handle on this problem. If anyone is using
clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 and is *not* experiencing a problem, will you
kindly reply and let us know?
Thanks.
Hello
I am using clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 on 3 diff systems
2 x FC5 and 1 x Centos 4.4
No p
We're trying to get a handle on this problem. If anyone is using
clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 and is *not* experiencing a problem, will you
kindly reply and let us know?
Thanks.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR
Peter Peltonen wrote:
> On 2/26/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Any news on your situation? Can you tell if the scans that hung up were
>> incoming or outgoing?
>
> I have no idea. I can switch my clamd back on, so we can find out. But
> how do I get more information about the scans
Peter Peltonen wrote:
> BTW: Maybe `service qmail restart` should sighup *all* the
> qmailtoaster related processes?
I've often thought the same thing.
> Is there a reason it does not do so at the moment?
I don't honestly know why it is done the way it is. I'd like to see some
enhancements done
On 2/26/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any news on your situation? Can you tell if the scans that hung up were
incoming or outgoing?
I have no idea. I can switch my clamd back on, so we can find out. But
how do I get more information about the scans that are hanging?
Regards,
Peter
On 2/26/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the report, Peter. I'm sure it'll help with tracking this problem
down.
You are welcome.
Restarting qmail (via qmailctl restart or service qmail restart, they're the
same thing) does not restart *everything*. It only recycles qmail
Peter (and others with this problem),
I've done some testing on the new toaster I just built. The only symptom
I've seen is the duplicated clamd log messages. Inbound messages have
scanned ok, and clamdscan terminated normally (afaict).
Any news on your situation? Can you tell if the scans that h
Peter,
One more thing. If at all possible, it'd be great if you could refrain from
backing off the update for a little bit. That way if the fix ends up being a
relatively simply tweak, we'll have a machine to try it out on right away.
Thanks.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
-
Thanks for the report, Peter. I'm sure it'll help with tracking this problem
down.
A few thoughts come to mind (first thing in the morning, so I hope I'm awake!):
Restarting qmail (via qmailctl restart or service qmail restart, they're the
same thing) does not restart *everything*. It only recycl
On 2/26/07, Peter Peltonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 12:50 the situation is: 8 clamdscan processes eating 100 % cpu
I notice that freshclam is not running:
# service freshclam status
freshclam dead but subsys locked
All I see in freshclam log are messages like this:
Received signal: wake
At 12:50 the situation is: 8 clamdscan processes eating 100 % cpu
I notice that freshclam is not running:
# service freshclam status
freshclam dead but subsys locked
All I see in freshclam log are messages like this:
Received signal: wake up
ClamAV update process started at Mon Feb 26 10:40:41
After restart I have now experienced that clamd processes are eating
up all CPU (2,8GHz HT P4):
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME CPU COMMAND
1321 clamav25 0 49292 46M 1616 R30.1 4.7 2:08 0 clamd
31064 clamav25 0 49292 46M 1616 R29.1 4.7 13
I seem to have similiar problems with the new clamav which I've been
running for a few days now. This morning I found out that my mail
server was not responding: no new emails came through, and nothing was
in smtp logs.
When checking process list, I saw tens and tens of clamav processes like this
I believe there are. And the simscan/clamav pairs seem to be
multiplying as a new check of processes returns:
vpopmail 2870 0.0 0.1 6468 1340 ?SFeb25 0:00
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /bin/true
clamav2892 0.0 0.0 1800 644 ?SFeb2
These almost-duplicate messages indeed look odd. I don't have them in an
older clamav-toaster version, but I do see them in a new toaster I just
built. I can't get into it any more tonight, but will be looking into it
first thing tomorrow. There appears to be some sort of problem with the
latest cl
Some of these simscan/clamav pairs seem to not be terminating normally. Are
there any smtp processes still active too (which would correspond to the
still-active simscans)?
Erik Grammer wrote:
> Thought this might be useful... a list of the clamd/clamav processes
> currently running:
>
> root
Thought this might be useful... a list of the clamd/clamav processes
currently running:
root 2188 0.0 0.0 1420 236 ?S19:31 0:00
supervise clamd
clamav2196 94.9 4.6 93948 47820 ?Sl 19:31 116:18
/usr/sbin/clamd
qmaill2206 0.0 0.0 1432 244 ?
Here is a snippet that suggests to me that there are multiple clamd
processes running but I don't know how to get rid of the duplicate (if
in fact that is the problem.) I feel out of my league here and
appreciate the help!
clamd log:
+++ Started at Sun Feb 25 19:11:35 2007
@400045e24ff
Does clamd log show anything?
Erik Grammer wrote:
> When I reboot the server and then run: ps -el | grep 'Z' I get nothing.
>I have to stop, then start qmail to replicate the problem. Then I get-
>
> ps -el | grep 'Z' returns:
> F S UID PID PPID C PRI NI ADDR SZ WCHAN TTY
When I reboot the server and then run: ps -el | grep 'Z' I get nothing.
I have to stop, then start qmail to replicate the problem. Then I get-
ps -el | grep 'Z' returns:
F S UID PID PPID C PRI NI ADDR SZ WCHAN TTY TIME CMD
4 Z 0 3441 3391 0 81 0 - 0 exit
It sounds like you have a zombie clamd running. If pid 3282 is still
running, kill it, and supervise should start it back up again.
If it doesn't restart on its own, bring down qmail, check for any zombies,
then restart qmail.
HTH.
Erik Grammer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Running fully updated toaster
Hi all,
Running fully updated toaster (as of 2/23/07) on fedora 4. Prior to the
full update I manually updated clamav with the devel package on Erik's
site and started receiving the following error on restarting qmail:
# supervise: fatal: unable to acquire clamd/supervise/lock: temporary
fa
Ray, you fixed my problem. Much appreciated.
Jeremy
-Original Message-
From: Ray Van Dolson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 2:27 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] ClamAV upgrade
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 02:19:26PM -0400
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
