Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Blocked.

2013-11-22 Thread Gman
Possibly I have a compromised server. eg; at this time Nov 22 *04:54:31*, I can guarantee this person was sleeping ( my wife ) Nov 22 *04:54:31* mail2 vpopmail[19559]: vchkpw-pop3: (PLAIN) login success kwy...@mydomain.com:myserverip So some how , something is logging in at that time.

[qmailtoaster] Re: Blocked.

2013-11-22 Thread Eric Shubert
I'd be careful in reaching that conclusion. Is any client program of hers running while she sleeps, like her computer or perhaps her phone? This is not uncommon. I'd be more concerned with unexplained activity in the send log. FWIW. -- -Eric 'shubes' On 11/22/2013 08:36 AM, Gman wrote:

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Blocked.

2013-11-22 Thread Dan McAllister
Not to re-invent the wheel here, but this falls into the same kind of thing I've been rolling out to all of my mailservers: - Port 25 is used to receive inbound mail ONLY. There is *no auth *capability on port 25 (currently enforced by /*spamdyke*/), and there is no relaying on port 25 (unless

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Blocked.

2013-11-22 Thread System Admin
Hi Eric is that in /var/log/qmail/send On 11/22/13 8:43 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: I'd be careful in reaching that conclusion. Is any client program of hers running while she sleeps, like her computer or perhaps her phone? This is not uncommon. I'd be more concerned with unexplained activity

[qmailtoaster] Re: Blocked.

2013-11-22 Thread Eric Shubert
Yes. # qmlog send is the easy way to view them. The qmlog command with no options will show you all the options available. -- -Eric 'shubes' On 11/22/2013 09:37 AM, System Admin wrote: Hi Eric is that in /var/log/qmail/send On 11/22/13 8:43 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: I'd be careful in

[qmailtoaster] Re: Blocked.

2013-11-22 Thread Eric Shubert
We're planning to move the stock QMT in the direction as Dan describes. On 11/22/2013 09:01 AM, Dan McAllister wrote: and I enforce SPF with a 3 in spfbehavior (and in SpamAssassin). I wonder about this though. Since you're enforcing SPF, what's left for SpamAssassin to do regarding SPF?

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Blocked.

2013-11-22 Thread System Admin
I seel lots of this in the send logs, is it normal user_and_password_not_set,_continuing_without_authentication - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail:

[qmailtoaster] Re: Blocked.

2013-11-22 Thread Eric Shubert
On 11/22/2013 10:02 AM, System Admin wrote: I seel lots of this in the send logs, is it normal user_and_password_not_set,_continuing_without_authentication - Yes, these are normal for messages sent to remote (non-local

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Blocked.

2013-11-22 Thread Dan McAllister
Eric, The default setting for SpamAssassin is to enforce SPF as directed (which means: soft-fail for ~ matches, hard fail for - matches, and ignore for ? matches). The operative part for me (since both qmail-smtpd AND SpamAssassin are apparently checking SPF) is the part where I ensure that

[qmailtoaster] Re: Blocked.

2013-11-21 Thread Eric Shubert
On 11/21/2013 04:35 PM, Brent Gardner wrote: On 11/21/2013 02:47 PM, Gman wrote: In the fail2ban config I have this relevent section # username-notfound [username-notfound] enabled = true filter = *username-notfound* action = iptables[name=SMTP, port=smtp, protocol=tcp] logpath =

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Blocked.

2013-11-21 Thread Angus McIntyre
Eric Shubert wrote: I honestly don't understand fail2ban in any detail. I wonder though, if perhaps it's set up such that if someone's authentication fails, then it changes iptables such that nobody can attempt to authenticate any more (like blocking port 587 for any address). That'd be