[qmailtoaster] Re: Sanesecurity, spamassassin spamdyke

2012-01-26 Thread Eric Shubert
On 01/25/2012 09:50 PM, Casey Price wrote: On another note...that link that Eric previously shared from Bill Schupp's site shows spamd running on a separate host with the spamc client running on the inbound boxes. How might one go about setting up something like this, and is it recommended? I

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Sanesecurity, spamassassin spamdyke

2012-01-26 Thread Casey Price
Casey Price Smile Global Technical Support Submit or check trouble tickets http://billing.smileglobal.com www.smileglobal.com http://www.smileglobal.com Follow us on Twitter https://twitter.com/#%21/SmileInternet Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/smileglobal On 1/26/12 10:06 AM,

[qmailtoaster] Re: Sanesecurity, spamassassin spamdyke

2012-01-26 Thread Eric Shubert
On 01/26/2012 06:34 PM, Casey Price wrote: Well, I have 3 different gateways and two SA boxes. Gateway2 is a QMT xen guest running on a Dell PowerEdge 2650. (I believe this machine has 4 or 5G of RAM with dual Xeon 2.6 or 2.8GHz processors). Gateway3 is a VPS I am leasing from ThrustVPS

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Sanesecurity, spamassassin spamdyke

2012-01-26 Thread Casey Price
Casey Price Smile Global Technical Support Submit or check trouble tickets http://billing.smileglobal.com www.smileglobal.com http://www.smileglobal.com Follow us on Twitter https://twitter.com/#%21/SmileInternet Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/smileglobal On 1/26/12 6:31 PM,

[qmailtoaster] Re: Sanesecurity, spamassassin spamdyke

2012-01-25 Thread Eric Shubert
On 01/24/2012 11:15 PM, Casey Price wrote: No worries Eric...I appreciate the insight! We have a few hundred domains with several thousand users. You should be able to get by with a single host in that case. Might need to beef it up a little though depending on what it's got. I meant to

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Sanesecurity, spamassassin spamdyke

2012-01-25 Thread Casey Price
On 1/25/12 10:40 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 01/24/2012 11:15 PM, Casey Price wrote: No worries Eric...I appreciate the insight! We have a few hundred domains with several thousand users. You should be able to get by with a single host in that case. Might need to beef it up a little though

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Sanesecurity, spamassassin spamdyke

2012-01-25 Thread Casey Price
Casey Price Smile Global Technical Support Submit or check trouble tickets http://billing.smileglobal.com www.smileglobal.com http://www.smileglobal.com Follow us on Twitter https://twitter.com/#%21/SmileInternet Find us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/smileglobal On 1/25/12 8:14 PM,

[qmailtoaster] Re: Sanesecurity, spamassassin spamdyke

2012-01-24 Thread Eric Shubert
The stock QMT configuration scans the message while the perimeter smtp session is still active, which allows it to simply reject the message (not accepting it), because it's coming directly from the sender's server. In this case, the sender's server is responsible for creating a bounce message

[qmailtoaster] Re: Sanesecurity, spamassassin spamdyke

2012-01-24 Thread Eric Shubert
Here's a setup that I like: http://www.shupp.org/maps/ispcluster.html Notice that spamd scanning is offloaded, but it's done while the smtp (mx) session stays open, so that messages can be rejected, not bounced. I'm glad this link is still up. I just found out that Bill appears to have

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Sanesecurity, spamassassin spamdyke

2012-01-24 Thread Casey Price
On 1/24/12 6:43 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: The stock QMT configuration scans the message while the perimeter smtp session is still active, which allows it to simply reject the message (not accepting it), because it's coming directly from the sender's server. In this case, the sender's server is