Michael Amster wrote:
> I performed an experiment to see what happens - I removed all the RBLs
> and saw that the response decayed from instant response after a qmailctl
> restart to about 15s after about 1hr. of running. It looks like the
> RBLs have no impact on my response time. This points to
I performed an experiment to see what happens - I removed all the RBLs
and saw that the response decayed from instant response after a qmailctl
restart to about 15s after about 1hr. of running. It looks like the
RBLs have no impact on my response time. This points to bayes
expiration as an is
Jake Vickers wrote:
> jason p wrote:
>> I removed sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org a few weeks ago when their legal troubles
>> started; it was causing me SMTP timeout problems back then. I tried
>> putting
>> it back once about a week ago, and as soon as I did my SMTP connections
>> started taking forever.
jason p wrote:
I removed sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org a few weeks ago when their legal troubles
started; it was causing me SMTP timeout problems back then. I tried putting
it back once about a week ago, and as soon as I did my SMTP connections
started taking forever. I also removed the others because t
From: Michael Amster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 2:58 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster
DNS is correct - running a local djbdns and it is screaming. I have
heard such good things about sbl-xbl.spamhaus.
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
Michael Amster wrote:
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
Michael Amster wrote:
Hi:
I run a relatively lightly loaded qmailtoaster - pretty current. I have
noticed that after a while the qmail-smtpd process seems to get bogged
down accepting incoming messages. I run
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
Michael Amster wrote:
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
Michael Amster wrote:
Hi:
I run a relatively lightly loaded qmailtoaster - pretty current. I have
noticed that after a while the qmail-smtpd process seems to get bogged
down accepting incoming messages. I run
gt;>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Michael Amster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October
>> 30, 2006 2:31 PM
>> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
>> Subject: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster
>>
>> Hi:
>>
>&
Michael Amster wrote:
> Eric "Shubes" wrote:
>
>> Michael Amster wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi:
>>>
>>> I run a relatively lightly loaded qmailtoaster - pretty current. I have
>>> noticed that after a while the qmail-smtpd process seems to get bogged
>>> down accepting incoming messages. I run rbl and m
er 30, 2006 2:31 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster
Hi:
I run a relatively lightly loaded qmailtoaster - pretty current. I have
noticed that after a while the qmail-smtpd process seems to get bogged
down accepting incoming message
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
Michael Amster wrote:
Hi:
I run a relatively lightly loaded qmailtoaster - pretty current. I have
noticed that after a while the qmail-smtpd process seems to get bogged
down accepting incoming messages. I run rbl and my blacklists file is:
-r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r
ssage-
From: Michael Amster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 2:31 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster
Hi:
I run a relatively lightly loaded qmailtoaster - pretty current. I have
noticed that after a whil
Michael Amster wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I run a relatively lightly loaded qmailtoaster - pretty current. I have
> noticed that after a while the qmail-smtpd process seems to get bogged
> down accepting incoming messages. I run rbl and my blacklists file is:
>
> -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net
Hi:
I run a relatively lightly loaded qmailtoaster - pretty current. I have
noticed that after a while the qmail-smtpd process seems to get bogged
down accepting incoming messages. I run rbl and my blacklists file is:
-r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r relays.ordb.org -r
dnsbl.an
14 matches
Mail list logo
