Re: [qmailtoaster] another 451 error

2007-07-11 Thread Jake Vickers
PakOgah wrote: Thank you A M, Hai Jake, can you share you script to archive qmail log. I think now I am need it. because some users asking me why the unable to send / rcvd to their partner which happen 4-5 days or more than 1 week ago, with reason they just have a free time to complain to me. b

Re: [qmailtoaster] another 451 error

2007-07-11 Thread PakOgah
Thank you A M, Hai Jake, can you share you script to archive qmail log. I think now I am need it. because some users asking me why the unable to send / rcvd to their partner which happen 4-5 days or more than 1 week ago, with reason they just have a free time to complain to me. but the logs alrea

Re: [qmailtoaster] another 451 error

2007-07-10 Thread A M
Hi, If possible you should enble recordio only when your partner is able to send you some test e-mail. ;) LF patch is a patch that allows qmail to accpet LF instead of CRLF (RFC compliance, and some mailers too) A M 2007/7/10, PakOgah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: qmail version qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3

Re: [qmailtoaster] another 451 error

2007-07-10 Thread PakOgah
qmail version qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.13 does this version has LF patch ? btw whatis LF patch? the error was happen yesterday, I think if I enabling recordio now wouldn't display what happen on yesterday thx b4 A M wrote: Hi, 451, if I recall correctly, hapens when some internal (local) con

Re: [qmailtoaster] another 451 error

2007-07-10 Thread A M
Hi, 451, if I recall correctly, hapens when some internal (local) condition triggers a processing error... Try enbaling recordio im multilog to see what hapens... try seraching the list for to enable it as realy don't remember very well. ADVISE: be aware that recordio logs the entire comunicat

[qmailtoaster] another 451 error

2007-07-10 Thread PakOgah
Today I get another 451 error from partner that he can send email to my users with below error < xm16.infosec.xxx.com #4.0.0 X-Symantec-Mail-Security; host mails.myholding.com[10.10.64.105] said: 451 Requested action aborted: local error in processing (in reply to end of DATA command)> it