Re: [qmailtoaster] pop3 slow

2009-09-02 Thread Eric Shubert
Adding more nameservers will not help performance (unless the first two are down of course). This 'feels' like a network issue to me. I've seen this sort of problem caused by errant routing table entries. If there's an entry which points to a bogus interface, that can cause delays. Check your

Re: [qmailtoaster] pop3 slow

2009-09-02 Thread Peter Tan
Thanks Jake, I'll check with the server co-location provider. Google and Yahoo have servers here in Malaysia, it shouldn't be that slow. I'm also going to add more NS to the domain. Do you think it will help? Currently, there's only 2 NS. On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Jake Vickers wrote: >

Re: [qmailtoaster] pop3 slow

2009-09-02 Thread Jake Vickers
Peter Tan wrote: I'm using djbdns. 2 lines in resolv.conf: search myservername.com nameserver 127.0.0.1 dig qmailtoaster.com ; <<>> DiG 9.3.4-P1 <<>> qmailtoaster.com ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;;

Re: [qmailtoaster] pop3 slow

2009-09-02 Thread Peter Tan
I'm using djbdns. 2 lines in resolv.conf: search myservername.com nameserver 127.0.0.1 dig qmailtoaster.com ; <<>> DiG 9.3.4-P1 <<>> qmailtoaster.com ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 47062 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, A

Re: [qmailtoaster] pop3 slow

2009-09-01 Thread Eric Shubert
Just 'dig' a few known domains and see what response times look like. # dig qmailtoaster.com # dig google.com # dig yahoo.com Do you have a caching nameserver installed on your toaster? That might help. # yum install caching-nameserver bind-chroot What's in your /etc/resolv.conf file? (this sho

Re: [qmailtoaster] pop3 slow

2009-09-01 Thread Peter Tan
Thanks. I'm not very sure, but it used to work. I don't have many users on the servers, the problem may have been there from beginning. Any examples of a proper DNS config? Peter On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Janno Sannik wrote: > On 1.09.2009 13:51, Jake Vickers wrote: > >> Peter Tan wrote: >

Re: [qmailtoaster] pop3 slow

2009-09-01 Thread Janno Sannik
On 1.09.2009 13:51, Jake Vickers wrote: Peter Tan wrote: I'm experiencing slow and broken pop3 download and SMTP upload. I've increased the timeout in Outlook, the problem persist. I tried downloading large attachments using Squirrelmail, most of the time the download stops. Any way to fix thi

Re: [qmailtoaster] pop3 slow

2009-09-01 Thread Jake Vickers
Peter Tan wrote: I'm experiencing slow and broken pop3 download and SMTP upload. I've increased the timeout in Outlook, the problem persist. I tried downloading large attachments using Squirrelmail, most of the time the download stops. Any way to fix this problem? Same attachments sent to gmai

[qmailtoaster] pop3 slow

2009-09-01 Thread Peter Tan
I'm experiencing slow and broken pop3 download and SMTP upload. I've increased the timeout in Outlook, the problem persist. I tried downloading large attachments using Squirrelmail, most of the time the download stops. Any way to fix this problem? Same attachments sent to gmail and downloaded witho

Re: [qmailtoaster] POP3 slow

2006-08-31 Thread K Anand
All of a sudden , in a couple of hours, it became OK..I'm still trying to find out the cause. Anand - Original Message - From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 8:10 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] POP3 slow > [

Re: [qmailtoaster] POP3 slow

2006-08-31 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I'm having a problem from today morning. My pop3 access has slowed down a lot. When I telnet to port 110 on localhost, I get the prompt very fast. But When I telnet to port 110 on the lan IP address, it is very slow. What could the problem be ? This machine has

[qmailtoaster] POP3 slow

2006-08-31 Thread kanand
Hi all, I'm having a problem from today morning. My pop3 access has slowed down a lot. When I telnet to port 110 on localhost, I get the prompt very fast. But When I telnet to port 110 on the lan IP address, it is very slow. What could the problem be ? This machine has been running without any pr