Re: [qmailtoaster] duplicate mail

2009-08-19 Thread Eric Shubert
:49 PM *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] duplicate mail Jinu wrote: Hi I using mail server prepared through qmail toaster. Here I’m facing problem with duplicate mails. If I send mail to multiple alias where same ID included in both alias, two mails

Re: [qmailtoaster] duplicate mail

2009-08-18 Thread Jake Vickers
Jinu wrote: Hi I using mail server prepared through qmail toaster. Here I'm facing problem with duplicate mails. If I send mail to multiple alias where same ID included in both alias, two mails will be delivered to user. I just come across the script called eliminate dups. Please help me

RE: [qmailtoaster] duplicate mail

2009-08-18 Thread Jinu
: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 4:49 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] duplicate mail Jinu wrote: Hi I using mail server prepared through qmail toaster. Here I'm facing problem with duplicate mails. If I send mail to multiple alias where same ID included in both

Re: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail Receives

2008-06-06 Thread Jake Vickers
Peter Peltonen wrote: What does this throttling mean: On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Kyle Quillen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First of all, throttle SMTP traffic with iptables to prevent excessive connections (and resultant spamd/clamd instances) in the first place: -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT

Re: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail Receives

2008-06-06 Thread Eric Shubert
Jake Vickers wrote: Peter Peltonen wrote: What does this throttling mean: On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Kyle Quillen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First of all, throttle SMTP traffic with iptables to prevent excessive connections (and resultant spamd/clamd instances) in the first place:

Re: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail Receives

2008-06-06 Thread Eric Shubert
Jake Vickers wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: That does mean that if you get more than 12 connections on port 25 in a 60 second timeframe by an IP you'll drop the rest of their connections from their IP at the firewall level. It's not targeted at clients; it's targeted at spam servers. Some of

RE: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail Receives

2008-06-03 Thread Sergio Minini {NETKEY}
You're welcome. Hope this fixes it. Sergio -Original Message- From: Dan McAllister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 4:57 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail Receives The server is an older one -- using

Re: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail Receives

2008-06-02 Thread Dan McAllister
The e-mails show up in Outlook, but the header on each message is entirely unique -- so I would surmise that the message is coming in twice from the sending server. This leads me to believe that the Toaster isn't acknowledging something at the end of the receive, so the sender is re-sending in

Re: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail Receives

2008-06-02 Thread Kyle Quillen
Dan, I know exactly what you are dealing with. Can you give us some specs as to what you are running and what are you load averages and hardware of the server? Thanks Q On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 15:19 -0400, Dan McAllister wrote: The e-mails show up in Outlook, but the header on each message is

RE: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail Receives

2008-06-02 Thread Dan Herbon
I upgraded to the latest version of toaster a week ago and it's been 1 week without any duplicates. -Original Message- From: Kyle Quillen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 3:43 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail

Re: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail Receives

2008-06-02 Thread Jake Vickers
Dan McAllister wrote: The e-mails show up in Outlook, but the header on each message is entirely unique -- so I would surmise that the message is coming in twice from the sending server. This leads me to believe that the Toaster isn't acknowledging something at the end of the receive, so the

Re: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail Receives

2008-06-02 Thread Dan McAllister
Sorry for the duplication folks... seems my SPAM Filter suddenly decided that the list was SPAM (in spite of being specifically white-listed). In any case, since my client hosts only their own email, but only recently upgraded to using SpamDyke, I set the idle-timeout-secs=120 in my

Re: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail Receives

2008-06-02 Thread Dan McAllister
The server is an older one -- using an Athlon XP 2400+ CPU, 1GB RAM. Again, it hosts a single mail domain (well, really 2 -- one aliased to the other), and the problem showed up a few weeks after they were upgraded to using SpamDyke. As I mentioned in an earlier (today) post, there was some

Re: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail Receives

2008-06-02 Thread Kyle Quillen
Dan, I was having the same type of issues and was given this advice from Darrien from the list. I have the email saved for future reference but I went through and did all of the things on the list and my server load decreased tremendously and the dups went away. So I think that the combination

RE: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail Receives

2008-05-28 Thread Dan Herbon
is: |/var/qmail/bin/preline /usr/bin/maildrop -A 'Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster' /etc/mail/mailfilter From: senthil vel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 9:59 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail Receives Check

Re: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail Receives

2008-05-28 Thread senthil vel
Check the /home/vpopmail/domainname/username/.qmail On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 3:13 AM, António Pedro Lima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You say your client complains about getting duplicate emails. Where does he see his emails? Outlook? Or webmail? -Mensagem original- De: Dan McAllister

RE: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail Receives

2008-05-28 Thread Sergio Minini {NETKEY}
-Original Message- From: Dan Herbon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 11:09 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail Receives I have been battling this problem for over a month now. Everyone in my entire company randomly

Re: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail Receives

2008-05-28 Thread Eric Shubert
this helps.- Sergio -Original Message- *From:* Dan Herbon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, May 28, 2008 11:09 AM *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Subject:* RE: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail Receives I have been battling this problem for over

RE: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail Receives

2008-05-27 Thread António Pedro Lima
You say your client complains about getting duplicate emails. Where does he see his emails? Outlook? Or webmail? -Mensagem original- De: Dan McAllister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada: terça-feira, 27 de Maio de 2008 20:56 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Assunto:

Re: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail

2006-05-31 Thread Mark Martin
We had this problem a while back, however, it only happened on attachments, and there were more that 1 duplicate. Turned out to be a bug maildrop. I believe the function was xfilter, since xfilter was 'C' code that did basically the same thing as a 'popen', I changed 'xfilter' to 'cc', the

Re: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail

2006-05-31 Thread John Q. Fernandez
I had the same issue but it might not be the same as yours, it happened after i upgraded to the newest qmail-toaster. to resolve i removed the .qmail file in the user's folder. /home/vpopmail/domain/user/Maildir/.qmail this is used for/by maildrop i think and maildrop is not supported from what

RE: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail

2006-05-31 Thread jason p
You don't happen to be tapping this email address and sending the logs of their email back to them? I would think this would create an endless loop, but I'm just kinda throwing out a quick suggestion... Check your /var/qmail/control/taps file -Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail

2006-05-31 Thread toaster
Hi, I am Not Configure in my mail server and there no taps file in control folder Regards Devendra You don't happen to be tapping this email address and sending the logs of their email back to them? I would think this would create an endless loop, but I'm just kinda throwing out a quick