yap that why I suggesting deepofix's control panel
I think they provide source code also on sourceforge
so JP can play around with it
plus with extjs it would be excelent control panel
and for qmailtoaster architecture (what software to use for IMAP, how to
use RBLs, etc) , I gave them to you
: donderdag 14 februari 2008 9:08
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster
Hi!
Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> It has been my plan for some time to get a smooth working and looking
webinterface for qmailtoaster.
[...]
Hi!
Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
Hi List,
It has been my plan for some time to get a smooth working and looking
webinterface for qmailtoaster.
[...]
I think it would at least need the following
- management tool for the administrator, to administer domains and settings of
qmt
- a qmailadm
I took a serious look at deepOfix too. I didn't notice that it installed all
that quick, but I don't think that's very important.
I was mostly interested to see what components it was using. I was pleased
to see qmail (with not as many patches as I would have liked) under the
hood. I also noticed
I myself installed it on a vmware box yesterday as well, it installs alot
faster than QMTISO and theres alot of stuff in the menu, not sure I like it,
its one of those menu systems that will grow on you with use I think, but
yeah, it has alot of the functionality that I think would be great for qmt
I haven't use deepofix in real-production environment,
I am only testing it on vmware to test the control panel.
the installation, straight forward, simpler than qmtiso since they
installed the package using binary files (compiling from source not
needed)
after that admin can open the control pane
WOW, I had never seen deepofix before... Im seriously considering switching
camps, does anybody ahve experiences they would like to share with deepofix?
On 13/02/2008, PakOgah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Wow JP that's a great idea...
> I'll support it by became beta-tester and documentor :)
>
>
Wow JP that's a great idea...
I'll support it by became beta-tester and documentor :)
for reference, I think you should see deep-o-fix control panel
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=156141
http://www.deeproot.co.in/deepofix
there is demo on their site
and access level for we
-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 4:27 PM
> > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster
> >
> >
> > > How about starting with simple,
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 4:27 PM
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster
>
>
> > How about starting with simple, smaller steps, and making
> those work
> > well, before asking for pie in the sky.
&
> How about starting with simple, smaller steps, and making those work
> well, before asking for pie in the sky.
Fair enough, like I said, just a wish list :).
Either way, I can offer up resources if needed.
Mike
-
QmailT
On Feb 11, 2008, at 7:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since it's just a wish list right now, what about being able to
administer
multiple servers from the one GUI? Or being able to cluster a few
machines
together for redundancy and maintaining them through this GUI.
How about starting wit
I am very happy to see that this turned into something so positive.
Since it's just a wish list right now, what about being able to administer
multiple servers from the one GUI? Or being able to cluster a few machines
together for redundancy and maintaining them through this GUI.
I have plenty of
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster
Um... Noone?...
Hint: you should NOT be running *any* MTA whatsoever, if you are unwilling
to even take the time to learn/understand it... That's just plain idiotic.
-Original Message-
From: Aslı Ayaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
aster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster
I am a new user for linux and qmail. The only thing I want to do that is
reaching the mailing lists from the web. Who can help me please
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster
> Mike's remarks about qmt invested in a thread about functionality and
ideas
> how we can make the missing part of qmt..
Ok, let's do that :).
> - management tool for the administrator, to administer domains an
Jean-Paul,
thank you for posting this idea. I also would like to join the development
process. I have much experience with xhtml/css designs which Ajax on some
places. Additionally I'm working for several years on accessibility issues on
websites - which is not only usefull for people with spe
m
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 9:43:41 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] New webinterface for qmailtoaster
any symbian phone -> symbian putty ssh :D nothin like admining a mail server
from the middle of a field full of cows
On 11/02/2008, Harry Zink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Whatever
any symbian phone -> symbian putty ssh :D nothin like admining a mail server
from the middle of a field full of cows
On 11/02/2008, Harry Zink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Whatever you do, make it heavily CSS based, which will make it easier to
> create alternate interfaces, like for the iPhone.
Whatever you do, make it heavily CSS based, which will make it easier
to create alternate interfaces, like for the iPhone.
Being able to administer your mail server from an iPhone would be (to
me) the ultimate tool.
Harry
On Feb 10, 2008, at 12:44 PM, Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
Hi L
> Mike's remarks about qmt invested in a thread about functionality and ideas
> how we can make the missing part of qmt..
Ok, let's do that :).
> - management tool for the administrator, to administer domains and settings
> of qmt
> - a qmailadmin replacement that works more logical
> - both wi
I don't really care about the implementation so much. I was meaning more the
organization. It's relatively easy to know what's there and find what you
want without becoming intimately familiar with it all. It's a good 'logical'
design (imho).
David Campbell wrote:
> I'm not sure it should go the t
I'm not sure it should go the the extent of javascript or css based drop
downs, thats just asking for problems, but I would like to see the "BUTTONS"
replaced with text links, because its so much easier to click text links
with the middle button and open them in new tabs in firefox...
On 11/02/200
oh god yes, thats the only thing I dislike about QMT, its just so damned
ugly, all my clients are like, "ew, whats with the green lines and stuff?"
no offense, its a great system, but its ugly.
Also, whats the deal with qmailadmin, you click on T for example, and the
page starts with the last user
Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> It has been my plan for some time to get a smooth working and looking
> webinterface for qmailtoaster.
> Not to brag, but I have the programming skills (php/c/c++) and I also
> would not mind hiring a designer to make the designs.
> The only 2 problem
I can offer the design help if you need it. She is a good designer and in
fact, is also good at putting together documentation.
Mike
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:44:18 +0100, Jean-Paul van de Plasse wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> It has been my plan for some time to get a smooth working and looking
> webinterf
26 matches
Mail list logo
