On Aug 12, 2008, at 11:58 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
I'd try
# rpm -e zlib-1.2.1.2-1.2
Yep, that did it -- all's back to being well in QMT land (well, until
the next updates roll around :-)
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR
On Aug 12, 2008, at 11:58 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Sure looks that way. Don't know how you managed that.
Neither do it - it's pretty much been a pain vanilla QMT box since
inception.
I'd try
# rpm -e zlib-1.2.1.2-1.2
to remove it.
Here we go again:
rpm -e zlib-1.2.1.2-1.2
error: Fail
Harry Zink wrote:
>
> On Aug 12, 2008, at 10:58 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>
>> f you'd've simply not selected it, you'd've gotten no errors. ;)
>
> LOL
>
>
>> I'd like to nail this one (once again, so it seems).
>>
>> You say this is the version you're running. Please post the results of:
>> # r
On Aug 12, 2008, at 10:58 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
f you'd've simply not selected it, you'd've gotten no errors. ;)
LOL
I'd like to nail this one (once again, so it seems).
You say this is the version you're running. Please post the results
of:
# rpm -q zlib
# yum info zlib
That might g
Harry Zink wrote:
>
> On Aug 12, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>
>> Harry Zink wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 12, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>>>
Did you select a fresh sandbox when you re-ran at this point? If you
installed the perl-HTML-Parser-3.56 but did not use a fresh sa
On Aug 12, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Harry Zink wrote:
On Aug 12, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Did you select a fresh sandbox when you re-ran at this point? If you
installed the perl-HTML-Parser-3.56 but did not use a fresh sandbox,
the old
version would still have bee
Harry Zink wrote:
>
> On Aug 12, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>
>> Did you select a fresh sandbox when you re-ran at this point? If you
>> installed the perl-HTML-Parser-3.56 but did not use a fresh sandbox,
>> the old
>> version would still have been in the sandbox. :(
>
> I redid fres
On Aug 12, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Did you select a fresh sandbox when you re-ran at this point? If you
installed the perl-HTML-Parser-3.56 but did not use a fresh sandbox,
the old
version would still have been in the sandbox. :(
I redid fresh sandboxes every time I ran it.
I'm trying to understand what happened here. Read below.
Harry Zink wrote:
>
>
> More data:
>
> Sandbox has been built successfully!
> qtp-newmodel - installing perl-Net-SMTP ...
> Loading "protectbase" plugin
> Setting up Install Process
> Setting up repositories
> rpmforge 1
Harry Zink wrote:
> Ditto here - same x86_64 architecture
> qtp-whatami v0.3
> DISTRO=CentOS
> OSVER=4.6
> QTARCH=x86_64
> BUILD_DIST=cnt4064
> BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat
>
> Would be awesome if qtp whatami would actually also provide kernel version.
That's an excellent suggestion Harry, with the
Anil,
Thanks for your help.
In both cases, the run files were absent - it appears that somehow the
perl dependencies hell has stopped the qtp-newmodel script from
properly creating those and executing through the end, even after I
had the dependencies fixed.
Harry
On Aug 10, 2008, at 1
Final summary - I did the updates manually - removed and deinstalled
clamav and spamassassin, and then reinstalled from the rpm's left
behind from the prior attempts.
Restart qmailtoaster - works!
-
QmailToaster host
MAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] QMAILtoaster upgrade fails
Lastly, here's the current status:
This is not going away:
supervise: fatal: unable to start clamd/run: file does not exist
supervise: fatal: unable to start log/run: file
Lastly, here's the current status:
This is not going away:
supervise: fatal: unable to start clamd/run: file does not exist
supervise: fatal: unable to start log/run: file does not exist
There is no appropriate 'run' file inside /var/qmail/supervise/clamd/
qmailctl stat shows:
authlib: up (
More data:
Sandbox has been built successfully!
qtp-newmodel - installing perl-Net-SMTP ...
Loading "protectbase" plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
rpmforge 100% |=| 1.1 kB
00:00
update100% |=
just been using linked.
I’m chasing the elusive pizza…
-P
From: James Ecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 4:54 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] QMAILtoaster upgrade fails
The distro is Centos 5.2 x86_64 kernel-2.6.18
Toaster 1.3
ing the elusive pizza…
>
>
>
> -P
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* James Ecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Saturday, August 09, 2008 4:54 PM
> *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
&
TED]
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 4:54 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] QMAILtoaster upgrade fails
The distro is Centos 5.2 x86_64 kernel-2.6.18
Toaster 1.3
Linked sandbox seemed to work thank you.
> Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 11:51:35 -0700
> Fr
_
From: James Ecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 11:18 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] QMAILtoaster upgrade fails
I have installed qmailtoaster-plus sucessfully, but when I run qtp-newmodel
I receive the following er
The distro is Centos 5.2 x86_64 kernel-2.6.18
Toaster 1.3
Linked sandbox seemed to work thank you.
> Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 11:51:35 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] QMAILtoaster
> upgrade fails> >
James Ecker wrote:
> I have installed qmailtoaster-plus sucessfully, but when I run
> qtp-newmodel I receive the following error message "chroot: cannot run
> command `qtp-build-rpms': No such file or directory." Does anyone have
> any ideas?
> --
21 matches
Mail list logo
