dnesday, January 09, 2008 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
Well Ronnie, you just can't get any better service than the author
himself!!
Looks like you're in good hands.
Phil
-Original message-
From: Sam Clippinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: We
ppinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 3:03 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
I agree spamdyke should handle the TLS so all of its filters can be used
(including graylisting).
However, spamdyke can't
Dan,
Did you get your backup server problem worked out? If so, what did you find?
Phil
-Original message-
From: Dan McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:11:03 -0500
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
> Sam,
I agree spamdyke should handle the TLS so all of its filters can be used
(including graylisting).
However, spamdyke can't filter outbound mail. Anything that's generated
on your server (e.g. webmail users) will bypass spamdyke entirely.
Anything that's sent through your server (e.g. your user
Sam, et. al.
I would say that to get the best results out of SPAMDYKE, you DEFINITELY
want *IT* to handle the TLS. My reasoning is 2-fold:
1) I have an average of 15% of incoming SPAM that is attaching with TLS
(I thought this was odd, but apparently not)
2) I require TLS for my outbound mail (
Actually, enabling TLS in spamdyke is the best solution. When spamdyke
handles the TLS, the remote server can't tell the difference -- if it
was using TLS before, it should continue to do so. However, because
spamdyke decrypts the traffic, it can enable all of its filters
(including graylisti
.3
> courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.7
> maildrop-toaster-devel-2.0.3-1.3.5
> simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.6
>
> Are the packages, bone stock except for spambox being enabled and per
> use settings for spamassassin.
>
>
>
> - Original Message - From: "Phil Lein
conf file.
Just will not work without it.
Thanks for the fix.
-Original Message-
From: Sam Clippinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 5:00 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
OK, I should
BTW, this is a great program, thanks it is really keeping the spammers @
bay
-Original Message-
From: Sam Clippinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 5:00 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
OK, I
, January 09, 2008 5:00 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
OK, I should be able to duplicate that setup to see if I can reproduce
your error. It may be a little while before I have the time, however.
In the meantime, can you try enabling
I will give this a shot tonight then send update.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Clippinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
OK, I should be able to duplicate that setup
er
use settings for spamassassin.
- Original Message - From: "Phil Leinhauser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
Well Ronnie, you just can't get any better service than the author
hi
Additionally, I was not able to get any emails from the qmail toaster list
either.
- Original Message -
From: "Ronnie Tartar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
Yes,
Spamdy
ster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
Looking at the configuration file you posted, it doesn't look like
you're using spamdyke's TLS at all (so my previous comment about the TLS
certificate doesn't apply). spamdyke should be passing the
ote:
> > Strange, those errors are on other machines. Not on the qmail toaster
> > machine.
> >
> > I ran the configtest, no errors.
> >
> >
> >
> > - Original Message ----- From: "Sam Clippinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > T
e.
I ran the configtest, no errors.
- Original Message - From: "Sam Clippinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
Most likely, spamdyke doesn't have permission to read your TLS
Strange, those errors are on other machines. Not on the qmail toaster
machine.
I ran the configtest, no errors.
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Clippinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with
Most likely, spamdyke doesn't have permission to read your TLS
certificate. Are you seeing any errors in the maillog on your qmail server?
You can also try running spamdyke with the "--config-test" flag to check
for configuration errors.
-- Sam Clippinger
Ronnie Tartar wrote:
Having trouble
I'm not running Spamdyke but It looks like you have it set to only accept TLS
(ssl) connections. If the sender doesn't do TLS it should fall back to normal.
Phil
-Original message-
From: "Ronnie Tartar" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:54:27 -0500
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmail
I may have lost a few messages, some servers were not able to get to me with
my config. I had to remove.
my spamdyke.conf file is:
log-level=2
local-domains-file=/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
idle-timeout-secs=60
reject-empty-rdns
greeting-delay-secs=5
reject-missing-sender-mx
reject-ip-in-cc-
20 matches
Mail list logo