Sebastian Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I Sent an email to Derrell, but shouldn't he be notified about such
>> things automatically?
>> When filing a bug I don't like having to bother who else I need to notify.
Hi Rüdiger,
I read this mailing list, receive the commit message, and receiv
Sebastian Werner wrote:
> Rüdiger Herrmann schrieb:
>> Hi Sebastian,
>>
>> thanks for the response. Please, see my comments below.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rüdiger
>>
>> Sebastian Werner wrote:
>>> Rüdiger Herrmann schrieb:
Is calling dispose on an already dispose object allowed?
>>> Yes, but has no f
Rüdiger Herrmann schrieb:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> thanks for the response. Please, see my comments below.
>
> Cheers,
> Rüdiger
>
> Sebastian Werner wrote:
>> Rüdiger Herrmann schrieb:
>>> Is calling dispose on an already dispose object allowed?
>> Yes, but has no further effect. There is a boolean
Hi Sebastian,
thanks for the response. Please, see my comments below.
Cheers,
Rüdiger
Sebastian Werner wrote:
> Rüdiger Herrmann schrieb:
>> Is calling dispose on an already dispose object allowed?
>
> Yes, but has no further effect. There is a boolean private flag to mark
> instances as dispo
Rüdiger Herrmann schrieb:
> Is calling dispose on an already dispose object allowed?
Yes, but has no further effect. There is a boolean private flag to mark
instances as disposed.
>
> Wouldn't it be then more straightforward to remove the destroy() and
> only have a dispose() like all the othe
Is calling dispose on an already dispose object allowed?
Wouldn't it be then more straightforward to remove the destroy() and
only have a dispose() like all the other widgets as well?
Unfortunately, disposing of an element of the treefullcontrol doesn't
work. I just filed a bug: http://bugzill
destroy() automatically executes dispose(). So destroy() is enough in
this case.
Sebastian
Rüdiger Herrmann schrieb:
> Thanks for the quick reply.
> Just the last answer I am not sure I got it. To completely get rid of a
> tree element I would write
>treeElement.destroy();
>treeElemen
Thanks for the quick reply.
Just the last answer I am not sure I got it. To completely get rid of a
tree element I would write
treeElement.destroy();
treeElement.dispose();
right?
Sebastian Werner wrote:
> Rüdiger Herrmann schrieb:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have some questions regarding the new wa
BTW, Another interesting document:
http://qooxdoo.org/documentation/user_manual/destructor_support
Sebastian
Sebastian Werner schrieb:
> Rüdiger Herrmann schrieb:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have some questions regarding the new way to implement destructors.
>> Some information I found here [1]. Is ther
Rüdiger Herrmann schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> I have some questions regarding the new way to implement destructors.
> Some information I found here [1]. Is there more information available?
>
> First of all, is it already fully implemented as the document says it's
> 'planned'?
Yes, they are.
>
>
Hi all,
I have some questions regarding the new way to implement destructors.
Some information I found here [1]. Is there more information available?
First of all, is it already fully implemented as the document says it's
'planned'?
Here the remaining questions
- do I need to call the supercla
11 matches
Mail list logo
