A patch is available for this "bug". It is rather an unexpected
(and undocumented) behaviour of editable combo boxes, than a real bug.
(So qooxdoo is not as buggy as it seems according to the previous posts.)
More information, test case, proposed patch:
http://bugzilla.qooxdoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
Hi Fabian, I created a bug report. Sorry, I don't have the time to fix this
by myself now... :-(
Fabian Jakobs-2 wrote:
>
> westor schrieb:
>> How is the status about these fixes?
>> As I notice, if you perform a Combobox.setValue("given value"), the
>> ListItem
>> which has the given value is
westor schrieb:
> How is the status about these fixes?
> As I notice, if you perform a Combobox.setValue("given value"), the ListItem
> which has the given value is selected, but also the label text of ComboBox
> is set to to this value.
> And a Combobox.getValue() returns unfortunatly still the la
ComboBoxEx implements already this behavior.
Sebastian Werner wrote:
>
> I'm not sure. Maybe it's a good idea. Other opinions?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sebastian
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ComboBox.getValue%28%29-bug-tf2270085.html#a12176123
Sent from the qooxdoo-deve
How is the status about these fixes?
As I notice, if you perform a Combobox.setValue("given value"), the ListItem
which has the given value is selected, but also the label text of ComboBox
is set to to this value.
And a Combobox.getValue() returns unfortunatly still the label instead of
the value
Hi,
Is there any news on this? I agree with everyone who says that getValue
should return the value of a ComboBox rather than the Label.
If there is no fix as yet, can any let me know of a work around? I've been
tring to obtain ComboBox values all morning to no avail.
Cheers
Aaron
Christian B
Hi Christian,I follow exactly the same approach. I have a FormManager class with three methods:*. Bind. Register a set of "form" widgets in the FormManager.*. Fill. Fill the values of the widgets with an AJAX response.
*. Clear. Remove all values from the widgets registered.I agree with you, this s
I vote for value.
Best,
--Tomek
Sebastian Werner wrote:
> I'm not sure. Maybe it's a good idea. Other opinions?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sebastian
>
>
>
> dperez schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think I have found a bug.
>>
>> If the TextField of a combo box is not editable, ComboBox.getValue() should
>> ret
Maybe something like this could be implemented for 0.6 ... would also ease
migration for me ;-) I am happy to share my ideas. When I use QxBuilder
with the QxDataManager, writing a new dialogue with snazzy interactivity
goes really fast!
The baseline approach is to treat ALL widgets as potential f
It's funny. Me too !!!This is because of the lack of databinding in qooxdoo. Any plans on this?On 9/14/06, dperez <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I have done something similar too. So it musn't be a bad idea
Christian Boulanger (Bibliograph Development) wrote:>> In my QxDataManager extension, I hav
I have done something similar too. So it musn't be a bad idea
Christian Boulanger (Bibliograph Development) wrote:
>
> In my QxDataManager extension, I have implemented a uniform behaviour for
> all widgets that enourmously simplifies form handling. Instead of the
> diverse ways of getting
In my QxDataManager extension, I have implemented a uniform behaviour for
all widgets that enourmously simplifies form handling. Instead of the
diverse ways of getting and setting the form element values (label, value,
html, checked etc. etc.) and options (for those widgets which support
options),
Yes the method should definitely return the value of the selected
ListItem.
And setValue should of course select the ListItem which has the given
value.
In general every ui.form widget should work like this so we can iterate
through all ui.form widgets and get or set their value without havin
I think it's a good idea. I have so far used a patch which overrides the
QxComboBox.prototype.getValue() method to achieve this exact result.
Best, Christian
> I'm not sure. Maybe it's a good idea. Other opinions?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sebastian
>
>
>
> dperez schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think I have found
I'm not sure. Maybe it's a good idea. Other opinions?
Cheers,
Sebastian
dperez schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I think I have found a bug.
>
> If the TextField of a combo box is not editable, ComboBox.getValue() should
> return the value of the selected ListItem, instead of its label.
> Do you agree?
>
Hi,
I think I have found a bug.
If the TextField of a combo box is not editable, ComboBox.getValue() should
return the value of the selected ListItem, instead of its label.
Do you agree?
Regards,
David
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ComboBox.getValue%28%29-bug-tf2270
16 matches
Mail list logo
