Re: spamassassin 2.61?

2004-01-09 Thread Matt Sergeant
On 8 Jan 2004, at 21:55, John Peacock wrote: Why would spamd be faster with PPerl? Sorry, I was misremembering something that Matt Sergeant told me once. He said to run spamassassin itself under PPerl (and not spamc/spamd) since PPerl will make it into a much more efficient daemon than

Re: check_delivery plugin error

2004-01-09 Thread Rasjid Wilcox
Michael wrote: Rasjid Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Try http://www.openminddev.net/files/qpsmtpd/plugins/check_delivery/ Cheers, Rasjid. I've tried that but get internal server error Any news about this? Sorry about that. The files are now in a single tgz

Re: spamassassin 2.61?

2004-01-09 Thread John Peacock
Matt Sergeant wrote: Yeah, but I was wrong because of the way SA loads rules the pperl version will be slower (by quite a bit). Well, that shows me to repeat something without testing it myself. ;~) As it turns out, I was way too lazy to get SA running under pperl; it was just easier to use

Re: denysoft-greylist

2004-01-09 Thread Gavin Carr
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 10:13:36AM +0100, Fiorenza Meini wrote: I'm trying to use the denysoft_greylist with qpsmtpd, but I see this error in the log file: Variable $self will not stay shared at ./plugins/denysoft_greylist line 165 What does it mean? What version of denysoft_greylist are