Show of hands: how many people are using PPerl with qpsmtpd?
I recently has some arguments with my server when I updated one of the core lib/
files and couldn't get the stupid thing to use the new file. It turns out I
forgot to restart the PPerl session (`svc -t .' wasn't sufficient). It was
Apart from demonstrating my ability to forget vital features of running my
system, does anyone have an opinion about whether it is worthwhile running
qpsmtpd under PPerl???
We're running it (mostly) at perl.org, because it really hides the
startup overhead, which can have a huge effect on
On 9 Mar 2004, at 21:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Robert Spier wrote:
Apart from demonstrating my ability to forget vital features of
running my
system, does anyone have an opinion about whether it is worthwhile
running
qpsmtpd under PPerl???
We're running it (mostly) at
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On 9 Mar 2004, at 21:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't been able to get PPerl to complete its tests properly -
probably minor things, but I'm not going to implement it until such
time
as all tests work.
I haven't seen reports from you
