On Jun 30, 2004, at 11:54 AM, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
qpsmtpd does not seem to support STARTTLS either. Is anyone working
on this, or is it a planned feature?
I'm not sure if anyone is working on it yet (John?), but it'd certainly
be nice to have.
It should probably be a "core feature" rather than a
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 02:54:26PM -0400, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> I'm interested in using qpsmtpd with the qmail-ldap patch. Does
> anyone use that? Any positive or negative experiences?
Works fine, since qpsmtpd doesn't really interact with qmail at all - it
just wants something that looks like q
I'm interested in using qpsmtpd with the qmail-ldap patch. Does
anyone use that? Any positive or negative experiences?
qpsmtpd does not seem to support STARTTLS either. Is anyone working
on this, or is it a planned feature?
Thanks!
Ted
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> On 2004-06-29 22:41:35 +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> > I haven't examined whether it's qpsmtpd or Mail::Internet that does
> > this yet - but I would like to change $headers->add() to put headers
> > onto the front of the email instead of the back.
On Jun 20, 2004, at 7:52 AM, Mark Powell wrote:
Running qpsmtpd on all the relays here. They are all stock FreeBSD
tracking the latest stable version, so they're on 4.10-STABLE now. The
default perl in FreeBSD 4x is still 5.005_03.
Ok so no-one knows the best version :)
5.8.4! :-)
What version
On Jun 19, 2004, at 3:46 AM, Tim Meadowcroft wrote:
Is there anything we can do to help, Ask, say a distintive format for
mail
subjects with patches to make it easier to keep track of them, or
should we
be moving towards applying changes to CVS directly ourselves ?
Maybe a bit of both would be in
On 2004-06-29 22:41:35 +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> I haven't examined whether it's qpsmtpd or Mail::Internet that does
> this yet - but I would like to change $headers->add() to put headers
> onto the front of the email instead of the back.
It's qpsmtpd. $headers->add() has an optional 3rd arg
