Lars Roland wrote:
Removing the daemonize stuff completely is going a bit to far (at
least from my point of view), it should never be required (or
desirable due to its crappy license) to have supervise installed
FYI - we've been here before on this list - you don't need to use supervise:
http:
On 5/31/06, Gordon Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lars Roland wrote:
> Removing the daemonize stuff completely is going a bit to far (at
> least from my point of view), it should never be required (or
> desirable due to its crappy license) to have supervise installed
FYI - we've been here bef
On 31-May-06, at 2:55 AM, Lars Roland wrote:
On 5/31/06, Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's a couple of bugs in your patch (missing disconnect code, so
QUIT never works). The following fixes that, and removes the
daemonize stuff.
Removing the daemonize stuff completely is going
On 5/31/06, Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Removing the daemonize stuff completely is going a bit to far (at
> least from my point of view),
I agree. Though I do think since we now have qpsmtpd-prefork and
qpsmtpd-forkserver, we should use a wrapper for daemonizing.
Matt.
This wo
Lars Roland wrote:
This would be ideal in order to minimize code duplication and give
users maximum choice (supervice/rnuit/deamonize/...).
OK, I committed the code that Lars submitted (with my little change),
then I applied the patch that Matt proposed (minus some whitespace
changes that obs
John Peacock wrote:
> Lars Roland wrote:
>> This would be ideal in order to minimize code duplication and give
>> users maximum choice (supervice/rnuit/deamonize/...).
>
> OK, I committed the code that Lars submitted (with my little change),
> then I applied the patch that Matt proposed (minus som
I'm using a modified auth plugin as supplied in 0.32. The
arguments are passed:
my ( $self, $transaction, $method, $user, $passClear, $passHash, $ticket ) =
@_ ;
And the test condition, there should be a match on the second
'and' pair:
if (
( ( defined $passClear )
