Re: Children keep "hanging"

2006-10-10 Thread Andreas Marienborg
On 11. okt. 2006, at 02.58, John Peacock wrote: Andreas Marienborg wrote: Indeed it did. I could have sworn I had seen processes hanging around much longer than that though, but that might have been a different symptom all together. Is there any reason to have a 20 minutes timeout? Yes. St

Re: Children keep "hanging"

2006-10-10 Thread John Peacock
Andreas Marienborg wrote: > Indeed it did. I could have sworn I had seen processes hanging around > much longer than that though, but that might have been a different > symptom all together. > > Is there any reason to have a 20 minutes timeout? Yes. Stupid users who insist on sending 80MB files

Re: Children keep "hanging"

2006-10-10 Thread Andreas Marienborg
Indeed it did. I could have sworn I had seen processes hanging around much longer than that though, but that might have been a different symptom all together. Is there any reason to have a 20 minutes timeout? Can it be shorter? andreas On 10. okt. 2006, at 22.52, Peter J. Holzer wrote:

Re: Children keep "hanging"

2006-10-10 Thread Peter J. Holzer
On 2006-10-10 22:11:21 +0200, Andreas Marienborg wrote: > alarm(1200) = 0 ^^^ That should kill the process after 20 minutes. Doesn't it? > read(0, -- _ | Peter J. Holzer| Schlagfertigkeit ist das, was einem |_|_) | Sysadmin WSR | auf dem Nach

Re: Children keep "hanging"

2006-10-10 Thread Andreas Marienborg
Thanks for the quick reply. Yes, that was my plan, and now I finaly did it :) write(1, "220 inamo.no ESMTP qpsmtpd 0.32 "..., 78) = 78 stat64("./config/timeoutsmtpd", 0x95050c8) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/var/qmail/control/timeoutsmtpd", 0x95050c8) = -1 ENOENT (No such

Re: Children keep "hanging"

2006-10-10 Thread Brian Szymanski
Try launching qpsmtpd via strace so you can see the entire log, including what comes before that read() call. Warning: that will be VERY verbose - if you are running via tcpserver without forkserver, you can probably just log to /tmp/log.$$ or so you can isolate the flow from the offending

Re: Heads up for users of spamhaus

2006-10-10 Thread Robert Spier
Last I had read it wasn't an order. It was something the spammers lawyer proposed. The judge has to sign it, and hasn't yet. http://www.spamhaus.org/legal/answer.lasso?ref=3 http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/default+judgement ANYWAY - further discussion of the legal aspects of thi

Children keep "hanging"

2006-10-10 Thread Andreas Marienborg
I deployed qpsmtpd a few weeks ago, and since that I've been having some trouble. I keep getting "stale" connections, that show up like this. smtpd13327 0.3 1.6 10032 7932 ?S13:28 0:01 | | \_ ./qpsmtpd [61.0.190.162 : 61.0.190.162 : 13:28:12 2006-10-10] if I