On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 12:17:32AM -0400, Bob Dodds wrote:
A per plugin deb or rpm could install into qpsmtpd with
minimal meddling that way. Maintaining debs rpms for
qpsmtpd installs with a given set of plugins would be
easy to maintain without scripting edits of config/plugins.
It can
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Charlie Brady wrote:
Is it impractical to build your RPMs so that they are version agnostic?
Speaking of agnosticism, I notice that the cf_wrapper, client_stats,
majordomo, rcpt_accept and rhsbl_rcpt plugin rpms are all arch i386, when
they could reasonable by noarch .
On 2005-08-23 14:16:08 -0400, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
I just updated my RPMs[0] to this version and deployed them on my private
mail server.
And its running on our primary MX since sunday. So far nobody has
complained ...
[0] At the usual place:
Speaking of configuration, I'd been meaning to pass this along for a while.
As part of the Debian packaging job I needed to write quite a bit of basic
documentation into the qpsmtpd config files, which might be useful to the
source distribution at large -- our plugins file documentation especially
On 2005-08-23 14:22:03 -0400, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Charlie Brady wrote:
Is it impractical to build your RPMs so that they are version agnostic?
Speaking of agnosticism, I notice that the cf_wrapper, client_stats,
majordomo, rcpt_accept and rhsbl_rcpt plugin rpms are
Devin Carraway wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 12:17:32AM -0400, Bob Dodds wrote:
A per plugin deb or rpm could install into qpsmtpd with
minimal meddling that way. Maintaining debs rpms for
qpsmtpd installs with a given set of plugins would be
easy to maintain without scripting edits of
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
On 2005-08-23 14:16:08 -0400, Charlie Brady wrote:
and I'd be happier to use canonical versions than home built ones.
I'm trying to keep the patches to the minimum, and I'm still hoping that
3 of the patches will make it into 0.31-final.
Ah, I
On 2005-08-22 08:37:31 +1000, Gavin Carr wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 07:38:24PM +0200, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
I just updated my RPMs[0] to this version and deployed them on my private
mail server. Unless I notice any problems I will deploy it on the WSR
mail server tomorrow, so any
On 2005-08-21 18:06:01 -0400, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On 21 Aug 2005, at 05:22, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
On 2005-08-20 20:59:10 -0700, Devin Carraway wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 07:38:24PM +0200, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
* My patch for a configurable plugin_dir (needed for the RPMs
directory
On 22 Aug 2005, at 03:57, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
Note this is why I implemented $Include.
Maybe my cold is addling my brain, but I don't see how $Include can be
used to load plugins from different locations.
In my RPM, qpsmtpd and qpsmtpd-forkserver are in /usr/bin (they
probably
should be
Matt Sergeant wrote:
On 22 Aug 2005, at 03:57, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
Note this is why I implemented $Include.
Maybe my cold is addling my brain, but I don't see how $Include can be
used to load plugins from different locations.
In my RPM, qpsmtpd and qpsmtpd-forkserver are in /usr/bin
On 2005-08-20 20:59:10 -0700, Devin Carraway wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 07:38:24PM +0200, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
* My patch for a configurable plugin_dir (needed for the RPMs directory
structure).
I ship a similar patch with Debian's qpsmtpd, for FHS compliance. It varies
from
On 21 Aug 2005, at 05:22, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
On 2005-08-20 20:59:10 -0700, Devin Carraway wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 07:38:24PM +0200, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
* My patch for a configurable plugin_dir (needed for the RPMs
directory
structure).
I ship a similar patch with Debian's
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 07:38:24PM +0200, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
I just updated my RPMs[0] to this version and deployed them on my private
mail server. Unless I notice any problems I will deploy it on the WSR
mail server tomorrow, so any serious problems should be noticable by
Monday ;-).
On 2005-08-17 15:40:38 -0700, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
We better get 0.31 finished before John comes back, so if anyone
wants to test:
http://svn.perl.org/qpsmtpd/tags/0.31rc2/
http://tmp.askask.com/2005/08/qpsmtpd-0.31rc2.tar.gz
If I don't hear otherwise in the next couple of
Peter J. Holzer wrote:
[...]
[0] At the usual place: http://www.hjp.at/apt/redhat/7.3/i386/RPMS.hjp
resp. http://www.hjp.at/apt/redhat/7.3/i386/SRPMS.hjp. I can
rebuild them for other Redhat/Fedora releases if somebody is
interested.
And if anyone is using my qpsmtpd RPMs (which
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 07:38:24PM +0200, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
* My patch for a configurable plugin_dir (needed for the RPMs directory
structure).
[...]
I agree that the last two are largely my personal preference, but the
first two I consider bug fixes, and the third really helps with
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 03:40:38PM -0700, Ask Bj?rn Hansen wrote:
We better get 0.31 finished before John comes back, so if anyone
wants to test:
I've had branches/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (or near it) running on my test/secondary
with the
Debian-specific patches for a couple of weeks without
18 matches
Mail list logo
