Last I had read it wasn't an order. It was something the spammers
lawyer proposed. The judge has to sign it, and hasn't yet.
http://www.spamhaus.org/legal/answer.lasso?ref=3
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/default+judgement
ANYWAY - further discussion of the legal aspects of thi
The order was to ICANN regarding the domain name. It is a curious
situation though.
Waitman
James Turnbull wrote:
> Matt Sergeant wrote:
>> http://wordtothewise.com/Spamhaus_ICANN_order.html
>>
>> If you're using sbl-xbl, consider temporarily switching to cbl until
>> this blows over.
>
> The
On 6-Oct-06, at 7:09 PM, James Turnbull wrote:
Matt Sergeant wrote:
http://wordtothewise.com/Spamhaus_ICANN_order.html
If you're using sbl-xbl, consider temporarily switching to cbl until
this blows over.
The order is essentially meaningless though isn't it? The associated
judgement is unen
On Oct 6, 2006, at 16:09, James Turnbull wrote:
The order is essentially meaningless though isn't it? The associated
judgement is unenforceable because Spamhaus isn't under the
jurisdiction
of US law - it's a UK entity. If Linhardt wants to stop them he is
going to have to file the same ca
Matt Sergeant wrote:
> http://wordtothewise.com/Spamhaus_ICANN_order.html
>
> If you're using sbl-xbl, consider temporarily switching to cbl until
> this blows over.
The order is essentially meaningless though isn't it? The associated
judgement is unenforceable because Spamhaus isn't under the j
http://wordtothewise.com/Spamhaus_ICANN_order.html
If you're using sbl-xbl, consider temporarily switching to cbl until
this blows over.
