Rudimentary config server

2005-04-26 Thread Matt Sergeant
I've just added a rudimentary config server to the high_perf branch. This allows you to connect on localhost to check number of concurrent connections and the number of pending dns queries. I have a few thoughts on other things that can be done, but I'd also like feedback on what people would

Re: Rudimentary config server

2005-04-26 Thread Robert Spier
What else would you like to see me add to this? Current connections. Top-connecting hosts.

Re: Rudimentary config server

2005-04-26 Thread Matt Sergeant
On 26 Apr 2005, at 13:50, Bob wrote: Pause/Continue, not so simple. I can appreciate that there would be lots of state issues to handle to deliver a simple sounding feature. Well it would be more like stop accepting connections and then resume accepting. It's really trivial to do that :-) Matt.

Re: Rudimentary config server

2005-04-26 Thread Brian Grossman
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:55:07 -0400 Matt Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What else would you like to see me add to this? List of current connections with whatever information about the connection is handy, especially time of connect and remote ip. Like ps. Since there are likely to be

Re: Rudimentary config server

2005-04-26 Thread Bob
Brian Grossman wrote: On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:55:07 -0400 Matt Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What else would you like to see me add to this? List of current connections with whatever information about the connection is handy, especially time of connect and remote ip. Like ps. Since

Re: Rudimentary config server

2005-04-26 Thread Bob
Bob wrote: Brian Grossman wrote: On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:55:07 -0400 Matt Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What else would you like to see me add to this? List of current connections with whatever information about the connection is handy, especially time of connect and remote ip. Like

Re: Rudimentary config server

2005-04-26 Thread Brian Grossman
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:51:21 -0400 Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mainly wishing they would timeout? If they're hanging on long enough to come to your attention, maybe a timeout watchdog would work. Doesn't forkserver have one? I was thinking in general, since there's other things I'd like to

Re: Rudimentary config server

2005-04-26 Thread Brian Grossman
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:14:00 -0400 Matt Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 26 Apr 2005, at 14:51, Bob wrote: Mainly wishing they would timeout? If they're hanging on long enough to come to your attention, maybe a timeout watchdog would work. Doesn't forkserver have one? high_perf

Re: Rudimentary config server

2005-04-26 Thread Matt Sergeant
On 26 Apr 2005, at 16:56, Brian Grossman wrote: Erm, could you point one out to me for an example? I'm hoping in particular to implement booting a connection when it doesn't say anything for several minutes. I do this in forkserver with SIG{ALRM}, for example. It just does it. It times out