Philip Gladstone wrote:
> The issue is that it used the register_hook and run_hooks functionality
> in an idosyncratic way -- it would register hooks with peculiar names
> and then (maybe) invoke them later.
I take it you mean that it is no longer possible for *some* *other* plugin to
register ran
I'm working on revitalizing the check_delivery plugin -- I used it under
an old version of qpsmtpd, but the new version (0.32) broke it.
The issue is that it used the register_hook and run_hooks functionality
in an idosyncratic way -- it would register hooks with peculiar names
and
As it seems that the check_delivery plugin is unmaintained (and
somewhat, erm, unavailable), I've made a distribution containing:
- the check_deliver plugin itself
- the dot-qmail-exists.pl [self written - couldn't find the original on
the net]
- a short INSTALL file
It can be
> [1 ]
> On 2005-11-22 12:58:00 -0500, John Peacock wrote:
> > So, my proposal is to create a /qpsmtpd/unsupported directory
>
> Bikeshedding alarm!
>
> I talked with a few friends this evening and they thought "unsupported"
> was a terrible name. The general consensus was that "unsupported"
> s
Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
[...]
1) It does seem a little "heavy" to me too.
2) If it's a good idea, why isn't it a good idea for the regular
plugins? (or: if it's not a good idea for the regular plugins, why is
it for the unsupported plugins?)
John's proposal gives small sandboxes to each d
On 2005-11-22 12:58:00 -0500, John Peacock wrote:
> So, my proposal is to create a /qpsmtpd/unsupported directory
Bikeshedding alarm!
I talked with a few friends this evening and they thought "unsupported"
was a terrible name. The general consensus was that "unsupported"
sounds like "the maintain
On 2005-11-23 03:40:12 -0800, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
>
> >John Peacock wrote:
> >>[...]
> >>3) Keeping all files related to a single plugin in a dedicated
> >>directory would make it easier to have a layout like this:
> >> unsupported/
> [...]
>
> 1) It does seem a little "heavy" to me too.
>
Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
John Peacock wrote:
[...]
3) Keeping all files related to a single plugin in a dedicated
directory would make it easier to have a layout like this:
unsupported/
[...]
1) It does seem a little "heavy" to me too.
2) If it's a good idea, why isn't it a good idea fo
John Peacock wrote:
[...]
3) Keeping all files related to a single plugin in a dedicated
directory would make it easier to have a layout like this:
unsupported/
[...]
1) It does seem a little "heavy" to me too.
2) If it's a good idea, why isn't it a good idea for the regular
plugins?
On 2005-11-23 13:54:19 +1100, Gordon Rowell wrote:
> John Peacock wrote:
> >[...]
> >3) Keeping all files related to a single plugin in a dedicated directory
> >would make it easier to have a layout like this:
[...]
> >How does this look?
>
> Looks good to me. I particularly like part 3) - a subt
> How does this look?
Feels like overkill to me.
-R (realizing he probably shouldn't be sending email now, so goes to bed)
John Peacock wrote:
[...]
3) Keeping all files related to a single plugin in a dedicated directory
would make it easier to have a layout like this:
unsupported/
check_delivery/
README - describe limitations and TODO's for this plugin
plugins/
check_delivery - actual p
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 09:07:37AM +, Robin Bowes wrote:
>Fred Moyer said the following on 21/11/2005 23:28:
>> Robin Bowes wrote:
>>>Can anyone point me at the latest version of the check_delivery plugin?
>>>
>>>I've checked the
Gordon Rowell wrote:
Since this one keeps coming up, can we get the check_delivery plugin
checked into SVN? I have an email from Rasjid saying that he would be
happy for anyone to take over maintenance.
I've briefly reviewed this plugin and I am leery of adding it to the
main distrib
Robin Bowes wrote:
[...]
Fred,
I'm already running 0.31.1 so I'd appreciate a modified version when
it's available.
If I get time I'll download and checkout the version linked above and
see how I get one.
Since this one keeps coming up, can we get the check_delivery
Fred Moyer said the following on 21/11/2005 23:28:
> Robin Bowes wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can anyone point me at the latest version of the check_delivery plugin?
>>
>> I've checked the list archives and found this:
>>
>> http://www.redh
Robin Bowes wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone point me at the latest version of the check_delivery plugin?
I've checked the list archives and found this:
http://www.redhotpenguin.com/check_delivery
Is that the latest?
I've been running that version in production for close to a year now
Hi,
Can anyone point me at the latest version of the check_delivery plugin?
I've checked the list archives and found this:
http://www.redhotpenguin.com/check_delivery
Is that the latest?
Thanks,
R.
--
http://robinbowes.com
If a man speaks in a forest,
and his wife's not there,
i
Philip Gladstone wrote:
> I'm looking for a copy of the check_delivery plugin. Unfortunately
> neither of the two servers that might host it seem to be up any more.
>
> If some kind soul could email me a copy, I'd be grateful.
I have it working in production but I had to
I'm looking for a copy of the check_delivery plugin. Unfortunately
neither of the two servers that might host it seem to be up any more.
If some kind soul could email me a copy, I'd be grateful.
Philip
--
Philip Gladstone
* Check out the live pondcam at http://pond.gladstone
Michael wrote:
"Rasjid Wilcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try http://www.openminddev.net/files/qpsmtpd/plugins/check_delivery/
Cheers,
Rasjid.
I've tried that but get internal server error
Any news about this?
Sorry about that. The files are now in a single tgz
"Rasjid Wilcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Try http://www.openminddev.net/files/qpsmtpd/plugins/check_delivery/
> >>Cheers,
> >>Rasjid.
> > I've tried that but get internal server error
Any news about this?
Any help would be appriciated
Thanks,
Michael wrote:
"Rasjid Wilcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 05 January 2004 02:57, Michael wrote:
"Skaag Argonius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You need the full package. Where did you get the plugin from?
Aric
(your?) wik
"Rasjid Wilcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Monday 05 January 2004 02:57, Michael wrote:
> > "Skaag Argonius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > You need the full package. Where did you get the plugin from?
> > > Aric
>
On Monday 05 January 2004 02:57, Michael wrote:
> "Skaag Argonius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > You need the full package. Where did you get the plugin from?
> > Aric
>
> (your?) wiki page
>
> http://qpsmtpd.nsa.co.il/CheckDelivery
Try http://www.openmind
"Skaag Argonius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> You need the full package. Where did you get the plugin from?
> Aric
(your?) wiki page
http://qpsmtpd.nsa.co.il/CheckDelivery
Best Regards
You need the full package. Where did you get the plugin from?
Aric
"Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I've tried the check_devlivery plugin from Skaag
>
> Iøve get the following error
>
> check_delivery plugin: W
I've tried the check_devlivery plugin from Skaag
Iøve get the following error
check_delivery plugin: WARNING: ./dot-qmail-exists.pl either does not
exist, is not executable by qpsmtpd or is not suid.
Anyone?
Best Regards
Michael
I've written a replacement to vpopmail_user_check.pl but in php. The file is
a php shell script and is called vpopmail_user_check.php.
This one checks in mysql (my vpopmail is sql based), and also checks .qmail
files, in short, it fully validates whether or not an email address exists.
It also che
I have just finished (more or less) a plugin to do the fabled "bounce invalid
addresses at the smtp level".
It is available at:
http://www.openminddev.net/files/qpsmtpd/plugins/check_delivery
Its main features are:
* knows all about /var/qmail/users/cdb
* knows about .qmail and .qmail-zzz-defaul
30 matches
Mail list logo
