Thanks, JJ for all you've done to help, but I still have not gotten it to
work.
I took your init.d startup script (debian) and altered it for the CentOS
(redhat) system I'm building (using 'daemon' rather than
'start-stop-daemon'). After taking care of a few minor issues, I gave it a
start with:
On Tue, 19 May 2009, J wrote:
I reinstalled clean, from scratch.
I changed my 'run' file to the following:
#!/bin/sh
exec 21 \
sh -c '
exec \
/usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 1 \
${PERL-perl} -T ./qpsmtpd-prefork \
--port 25 \
--port 587
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Charlie Brady wrote:
I changed my 'run' file to the following:
#!/bin/sh
exec 21 \
sh -c '
exec \
/usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 1 \
${PERL-perl} -T ./qpsmtpd-prefork \
--port 25 \
--port 587 \
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Charlie Brady wrote:
So try:
#!/bin/sh
exec 21 \
exec \
/usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 1 \
/usr/bin/perl -T ./qpsmtpd-prefork \
--port 25 \
--port 587 \
--children 30 \
--idle-children 5 \
--renice-parent
On Wed, 20 May 2009, J wrote:
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Charlie Brady wrote:
So try:
#!/bin/sh
exec 21 \
exec \
/usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 1 \
/usr/bin/perl -T ./qpsmtpd-prefork \
--port 25 \
--port 587 \
--children 30 \
On Wed, 20 May 2009, J wrote:
I compared the run file with other run files (i.e. djbdns and qmail) and I
think the problem is with the trailing ' \' on the 2nd line (the first
exec).
Indeed. That shouldn't be there.
When I remove that (and installed a missing Math::BigInt package from
On Wed, 20 May 2009, J wrote:
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Charlie Brady wrote:
So try:
#!/bin/sh
exec 21 \
exec \
/usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 1 \
...
./run: line 2: exec: exec: not found
Sorry, I cut and pasted without checking each line. You are asking shell
to run this:
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Wed, 20 May 2009, J wrote:
When I remove that (and installed a missing Math::BigInt package from
CPAN), everything loads, but complains about an insecure dependency on
line 416 in setpriority (in qpsmtpd-prefork). (And the prefork processes
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Charlie Brady wrote:
Though it is probably a bug, I'm guessing we don't test with taint on.
Perl taint mode is an underutilised gem.
It is, but it's also buggy and annoying.
(there's a completely ignored bug in perl with -T and hash keys which I
filed months ago)
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Matt Sergeant m...@sergeant.org wrote:
(there's a completely ignored bug in perl with -T and hash keys which I
filed months ago)
Matt.
that hash keys are never tainted is documented, if that's your bug. It
allows for a quick and dirty
sub detaint($){ [
On Wed, 20 May 2009, David Nicol wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Matt Sergeant m...@sergeant.org wrote:
(there's a completely ignored bug in perl with -T and hash keys which I
filed months ago)
that hash keys are never tainted is documented, if that's your bug. It
allows for a
11 matches
Mail list logo
