Isn't back scatter exactly the intent of the spammer? Send the spam to invalid
addresses with a forged return which is where the reject goes.
But you could be right: back scatter may be so specific that these two scripts
would be the only ones ever to go into the folder.
Addresses or
On 3/12/2011 3:19 AM, Todd wrote:
Isn't back scatter exactly the intent of the spammer? Send the spam to invalid
addresses with a forged return which is where the reject goes.
The reality is that spammers use forged sender addresses so their own
accounts don't get nuked. Relying on
On Friday 11 March 2011 03:41:03 Chris Lewis wrote:
I think we'd be better served by coming up with, for example, a qpsmtpd
way of doing this sort of thing.
For example: for basic RCPT TO functionality, have a basic RCPT time
plugin that can handle aliasing, allowable domain relays, lists
On 3/10/2011 11:27 PM, Robert Spier wrote:
Tim Meadowcroft wrote:
On Thursday 10 March 2011 18:06:04 Robert Spier wrote:
Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Mar 10, 2011, at 6:49, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Should we have plugins/qmail and plugins/postfix dirs?
I like that idea.
I'm not sure I do.
One solution would be to add a new directory named 'backscatter' and
put both scripts in there with the same prefix (check_goodrcptto) and
with a distinguishing suffix (_postfix _qmail). That would be clear
to people that are interested in the subject.
Yes. Except backscatter isn't quite
On Mar 10, 2011, at 19:41, Chris Lewis wrote:
I think we'd be better served by coming up with, for example, a qpsmtpd way
of doing this sort of thing.
For example: for basic RCPT TO functionality, have a basic RCPT time plugin
that can handle aliasing, allowable domain relays, lists of
Should we have plugins/qmail and plugins/postfix dirs?
Todd Brunhoff wrote:
Tim's view seems appropriate. His script is centered on qmail, and
mine is centered on postfix (or more specifically, on /etc/aliases).
Both scripts are probably best in their current form with appropriate
Works 4 me.
--
Sent from my Android.
Matt Sergeant m...@sergeant.org wrote:
Should we have plugins/qmail and plugins/postfix dirs?
Todd Brunhoff wrote:
Tim's view seems appropriate. His script is centered on qmail, and
mine is centered on postfix (or more specifically, on /etc/aliases).
On Mar 10, 2011, at 6:49, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Should we have plugins/qmail and plugins/postfix dirs?
I like that idea.
- ask
Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Mar 10, 2011, at 6:49, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Should we have plugins/qmail and plugins/postfix dirs?
I like that idea.
I'm not sure I do. The existing directories don't really line up that
way, and I don't think we're going to have a huge number of
On Thursday 10 March 2011 18:06:04 Robert Spier wrote:
Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Mar 10, 2011, at 6:49, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Should we have plugins/qmail and plugins/postfix dirs?
I like that idea.
I'm not sure I do. The existing directories don't really line up that
way, and I
On 3/10/2011 12:43 PM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Mar 10, 2011, at 6:49, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Should we have plugins/qmail and plugins/postfix dirs?
I like that idea.
I think we'd be better served by coming up with, for example, a qpsmtpd
way of doing this sort of thing.
For example:
Tim Meadowcroft wrote:
On Thursday 10 March 2011 18:06:04 Robert Spier wrote:
Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Mar 10, 2011, at 6:49, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Should we have plugins/qmail and plugins/postfix dirs?
I like that idea.
I'm not sure I do. The existing directories don't
On Sunday 06 March 2011 06:42:50 Robert Spier wrote:
Todd Brunhoff wrote:
Your scripts look like they have a good deal of qmail
sophistication. Some years ago I ran qmail 1.0.3, after each major
system crash, I would revisit whether to use qmail, and eventually
decided to switch
Tim's view seems appropriate. His script is centered on qmail, and
mine is centered on postfix (or more specifically, on /etc/aliases).
Both scripts are probably best in their current form with appropriate
disclosures. Let me know if there is any prep work you would like me to
do to my
Todd Brunhoff wrote:
Your scripts look like they have a good deal of qmail
sophistication. Some years ago I ran qmail 1.0.3, after each major
system crash, I would revisit whether to use qmail, and eventually
decided to switch to qpsmtp+postfix because both seem to have better
Your scripts look like they have a good deal of qmail sophistication.
Some years ago I ran qmail 1.0.3, after each major system crash, I would
revisit whether to use qmail, and eventually decided to switch to
qpsmtp+postfix because both seem to have better support. And in fact,
the reason I
17 matches
Mail list logo
