On 8 Jan 2004, at 21:55, John Peacock wrote:
Why would spamd be faster with PPerl?
Sorry, I was misremembering something that Matt Sergeant told me once.
He said to run spamassassin itself under PPerl (and not spamc/spamd)
since PPerl will make it into a much more efficient daemon than
Matt Sergeant wrote:
Yeah, but I was wrong because of the way SA loads rules the pperl
version will be slower (by quite a bit).
Well, that shows me to repeat something without testing it myself. ;~)
As it turns out, I was way too lazy to get SA running under pperl; it was just
easier to use
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004, John Peacock wrote:
Both #'s 2 and 3 can also take advantage of the Mail::SpamAssassin 2.60+ feature
of using Unix Domain Sockets to communicate with spamd, which should also be a
distinct performance gain (as well as being much better security-wise). spamd
can also
Roger Walker wrote:
The plugin in the current distribution has a note not to use 2.50,
but 2.40 or newer. The current version is 2.61. Does this work properly
with the supplied plugin?
There are (at least) three ways to run SpamAssassin from within qpsmtpd:
1) Call Mail::SpamAssassin
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004, Aran Deltac wrote:
I personally prefer my modified spamassassin plugin which talks to spamc
(which in turn talks to spamd). I've been running it for about a month
on a fairly busy server without any problems. Its the plugin
spamassassin_spamc at:
