On Friday 24 September 2010 09:26:21 ext Matthias Pospiech wrote:
>
> Am 24.09.2010 08:13, schrieb André Pönitz:
> >> However I experienced that without Qt debugging of a plain c++ project
> >> failed. The easy solution was to readd QtCore again.
> > That sounds like you were (not...) using the
Am 24.09.2010 08:13, schrieb André Pönitz:
>> However I experienced that without Qt debugging of a plain c++ project
>> failed. The easy solution was to readd QtCore again.
> That sounds like you were (not...) using the compiled debugging helpers,
> i.e. you are either on Mac, or more likely usin
On Thursday 23 September 2010 18:05:26 ext Matthias Pospiech wrote:
>
> Am 23.09.2010 17:24, schrieb Coda Highland:
> > The only change needed to the .pro file is "CONFIG -= qt", and
> > forgetting that just means that the application LINKS to QtCore and
> > QtGui -- it doesn't require you to us
>
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 08:19 -0700, "Eric Anderson"
> wrote:
>
> What environment are you running QT in?
I'm not running Qt - well, if you mean qtcreator, perhaps I am - but
anyway, the class is using computers running Microsoft Windows - some
virtual machine or other. I don't use Microsoft
Yeah that's what it wants you to think.
> but for simple projects like
> school assignments, it's PERFECT in its simplicity. You can't GET
> simpler.
>
> /s/ Adam
>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Max Waterman
> wrote:
>> I'm trying to get my university C++ course tutor to use QtCreator in
Am Thursday 23 September 2010 schrieb Eric Anderson:
> The Linux environment would not run in a new window and we moved on to other
> projects before we were able to resolve the issue with stdin. Stdout in
> linux can be seen inside QT in the program output pane.
on the left pane: project
find th
Am 23.09.2010 17:24, schrieb Coda Highland:
> The only change needed to the .pro file is "CONFIG -= qt", and
> forgetting that just means that the application LINKS to QtCore and
> QtGui -- it doesn't require you to use any Qt classes or tools in the
> source code.
I have been using QtCreator in
Speaking as a student myself, in my opinion if it's an introduction to
C++ class (or especially a first-level programming class in general),
then doing Makefiles by hand is probably too complicated (even though
it is a good skill to have), but the assignments would probably not be
complex enough to
The only change needed to the .pro file is "CONFIG -= qt", and
forgetting that just means that the application LINKS to QtCore and
QtGui -- it doesn't require you to use any Qt classes or tools in the
source code. You can add source files to the project using Creator
itself, so there's no need to w
What environment are you running QT in?
I was doing this for C++ training for my high school robotics team. A
problem that we had was inconsistency between QT in a Linux environment vs
QT in a windows environment with respect to stdin and stdout.
The windows environment would run in a command wi
Like I said... it depends on what is being taught.
Karl
On 9/23/2010 9:46 AM, Danny Price wrote:
I completely disagree. C++ is complex enough without
having to worry about introducing makefiles and toolchains to
students, particularly non-
I completely disagree. C++ is complex enough without having to worry about
introducing makefiles and toolchains to students, particularly non-standard,
platform-specific makefiles and toolchains.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Karl Ruetz wrote:
> It would also depend on exactly what is being
Am Thursday 23 September 2010 schrieb Max Waterman:
> I'm trying to get my university C++ course tutor to use QtCreator in his
> lectures rather than something which actually looks pretty aweful.
>
> However, because he's not teaching Qt, he needs it to support plain
> boring C++.
>
> What's the
It would also depend on exactly what is being
taught. If this is a level one C++ course, I would recommend
editing the make file manually so the students have some basic
understanding of what a makefile is and how it relates to project
management. Then you can
Actually, I use qmake on some pretty big projects (with many
contributors - libmeegotouch is the case in point). We/I have had
some trouble with it too, but in almost all cases it is me/us not
knowning how it works (or undocumented features) and it can in
fact be made to do what I want. I'm sure th
В Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:41:52 +0100
Danny Price пишет:
DP> You can do that but it means using qmake which is rather unforgiving and
DP> cludgy. It's nice to have confidence in your tools. Plus it mean every
DP> student would need the Qt sdk. You'd much rather spend your time
DP> productively than t
You can do that but it means using qmake which is rather unforgiving and
cludgy. It's nice to have confidence in your tools. Plus it mean every
student would need the Qt sdk. You'd much rather spend your time
productively than trying to figure what qmake is not linking your libraries
because you go
Wow. So much trouble/hassle :(
I think I'd rather recommend just making a Qt Console application and
editing the project file to remove 'core' from $$QT.
The lecturer can then just this project to quickly 'type, compile, run'
stuff, with the console output at the bottom of the page.
Perhaps bigg
If you have the option, I would recommend CMake. It's a lot easier than
crafting your own makefiles. Creator has very limited support for cmake but
it's enough for trivial projects.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Alexander 'hatred' Drozdoff <
adrozd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> В Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13
В Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:25:41 +0300
"Max Waterman" пишет:
MW> I'm trying to get my university C++ course tutor to use QtCreator in his
MW> lectures rather than something which actually looks pretty aweful.
MW>
MW> However, because he's not teaching Qt, he needs it to support plain
MW> boring C++.
I'm trying to get my university C++ course tutor to use QtCreator in his
lectures rather than something which actually looks pretty aweful.
However, because he's not teaching Qt, he needs it to support plain
boring C++.
What's the easiest way to do this? It's not entirely obvious from the
project
21 matches
Mail list logo
