Kyle Kinsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Win98 is very similar to the Win95, but it isn't just bug-fixed
version - there are some serious differencies in the kernel. For
example, Win98 does have native (built-in) support for USB peripheral,
and Win98SE - support for FireWire peripheral, unlike
Excuse me, but it isn't really correct. The support essentially means,
that after installing so-called 'USB patch' (it must be installed
manually, BTW), in the Device Manager you'll see gray square labelled
'USB hub' instead of yellow question mark labelled 'Unknown PCI device'.
But you'll be
DOS cards as found on 630 DOS Compatible Macs were limited to 32 MB
RAM. Try running Win98 in 32 MB RAM :-(
Actually I run Win98SE on an old machine around here which has only 16mb.
But then I am sick! ;-)
Kyle Kinsey
+-
| eMail: [EMAIL
See, I know that when Apple wrote the manuals for the last 68k Mac in 1994,
there were no bigger simms available than 32MB, but it is like I wrote, some
simms over 32MB may work, but definitely *not all*, like I wrote in my post:
Maybe some memory will work, but better check it first since 128MB
At 13:16 +, 1/25/03, (Kyle Kinsey) observed:
But look at the Subject: line - we're just speaking about 'what software
might work on particular Macintosh hardware'! :-)
But even then we've stretched a little!
A nanny, I have no particular problem with this thread, it *is*
At 14:30 +0100 on 25/01/03, Peter Heinemann wrote:
I could not read what is written in the macfaq (down?), but I found this
link:
http://www.lowendmac.com/tech/64mb.html
The information in that article is essentially identical to what I've posted in
the FAQ; Dan may be somewhat more behind on
At 05:16 AM 1/25/2003, Kyle Kinsey typed thusly:
Excuse me, but it isn't really correct. The support essentially means,
that after installing so-called 'USB patch' (it must be installed
manually, BTW), in the Device Manager you'll see gray square labelled
'USB hub' instead of yellow question
On 24 Jan 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could run Win95 (I used to) but I found there was also a
(serious) limitation with this card. It's highest video display was
800 x 600 at 4bit resolution - 16 colors in total. Just pitiful. You
could get 8bit color at 640 x 480
Did you
