Re: Grammar [ was Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages ]

on 12/20/02 11:47 AM, J Sand at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > me and whoever whoever and me -- All the best, R.A. Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Quadlist is sponsored by and... Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com | Enter To Win A | -- Canon PowerShot Di

Re: Grammar [ was Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages ]

>But "me and whoever" is quite correct, if used in the accusative. > >e.g. My father sent me and whoever away to school. > > > Thanks, I will do some research on that and I might finally be able not to cringe with my children's usage of the English language. - LOL _

Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

OMg ladie please grow up!@!! -- Quadlist is sponsored by and... Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com | Enter To Win A | -- Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras start at $299 | Free iBook! | Support Low End Mac

Re: Q950 upgrade was Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

At 07:49 -0100 on 19/12/02, Ian Moffatt wrote: >**Quadlist content warning** LOL! >Anyone upgraded a Q950 by putting a PPC motherboard in? I think the NuBus >option may be easier though. Only mobo that fits is that from the Workgroup Server 9150, and they're not only rare, but also very valuabl

Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

At 11:33 AM 12/19/2002, Jim Lunceford typed thusly: >Please correct for grammer, content and netiquette and reply to: Unfortunately, my grammer died several years ago, about the time of the last quadras, and therefore never had to worry about netiquette -Eric -- Quadlist is sponsored by

Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

List Nanny: Due to the fact that nothing on this list seems to be O.T. at this point, I thought I'd just ignore the the policy of writing directly to you and just send it to list. I have a suggestion.I think we should start a new list. We could call it "The NO MORE WARNING, NETIQUETTE and GRAMMER

Re: -sigh- was:[Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages]

At 7:51 -0600, 12/19/02, (Danny Saul) observed: I wish to thank all you who supported me, I was half awake when I posted that and I could of phrased it better, but the pickle and the other went out of bounds to probe my e-mail for the slightest errors in spelling and grammar after I had b

-sigh- was:[Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages]

I wish to thank all you who supported me, I was half awake when I posted that and I could of phrased it better, but the pickle and the other went out of bounds to probe my e-mail for the slightest errors in spelling and grammar after I had been awake you 20 minutes. Nice going I applaud you in your

Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

On 12/18/02 8:47 AM, "the pickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 22:08 -0700 on 17/12/02, J Sand wrote: > >> None were meant to be an attack. I get just as frustrated as you do about > > I'm a blunt person, so I'll put this bluntly. While John's might not have > been, mine certainly was. If

Re: Grammar [ was Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages ]

Think we can all do without the grammer lesson. Top posted for your reading convience. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >But "me and whoever" is quite correct, if used in the accusative. > >e.g. My father sent me and whoever away to school. > > > > > >>I guess my English teachers back in school did

Grammar [ was Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages ]

But "me and whoever" is quite correct, if used in the accusative. e.g. My father sent me and whoever away to school. > > I guess my English teachers back in school did their job well. It is ironic > because my children say "me and whoever" instead of "whoever and I". I > cringe at that,

Trying to drag back on topic Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

Um... looks like someone tried to take this offlist... and it got dragged back on. Might I suggest that everyone start updating emailing filters so this flame-fest can fade away already? In the meantime... down to two Q840AVs and the trusty 800. No idea why the third has flaked out... it's cur

Q950 upgrade was Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

On 19/12/02 6:21 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No you don't you smug, smarmy, fundimentalist hypocrite. You want me to > drop dead, but if you admitted to yourself that you felt that way then > you'd realze what an evil self-centered hypocritical SOB you really are. No h

Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

> >No not holier than thou, read the rest of the message of how I didn't care >for the taking of God's name in vain and how I thought it was very off >color. Of course, and since this one is coming directly to you and not the >list, you don't seem to understand about trying to find peace. First

Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

> > >Try to understand the "Ref" has said enough is enough! There was no >particular person mentioned, just that the BS has to stop! The nanny didn't >ask who started it, but just wants this type of inconsiderate behavior >ended. Is that too much to ask for? > >John > Getting a little holier

NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

> >Please feel free to suspend me, delete me,unsubcribe me or whatever else >you feel like doing. You didn't say boo while pickle the prick and his >sniggering butt-licking toadies flamed other listmembers, but the moment >I raised my voice then list nanny vincenzo starts getting all pissy. >Ma

Re: WARNING !!!!!!! was Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

> >Enough is enough. I have tried dealing with this on the quiet and it >didn't work. So here goes, Anyone blasting or flaming (which ever >terminology you wish to use) another member on list will have their >posting priviledges immeditely suspended, till further notice. It sure >doesn't take m

WARNING !!!!!!! was Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

Greetings to all >>I'm a blunt person, so I'll put this bluntly. While John's might >>not have been, mine certainly was. If you're so *stupid* that >>you can't even take two seconds to figure out *WHY* you might be >>getting these messages and doing something about them, I'm sorry, >> but I'd

Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

> >I'm a blunt person, so I'll put this bluntly. While John's might not have >been, mine certainly was. If you're so *stupid* that you can't even take two >seconds to figure out *WHY* you might be getting these messages and doing >something about them, I'm sorry, but I'd rather not have you aroun

Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

The slan would be written "com'on" J Sand wrote: >This is sad because, for example, the phrase "come on" has a different >meaning than the word "common" and written communication suffers in it's >ability to be clear to someone who is not familiar with slang associated >with a use of a language

Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

The "common" was meant as another "misspelling" from the party involved. I do know the difference pickle. My sarcasm was repeating the misspelling involved. I guess my English teachers back in school did their job well. It is ironic because my children say "me and whoever" instead of "whoev

Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

At 22:08 -0700 on 17/12/02, J Sand wrote: >None were meant to be an attack. I get just as frustrated as you do about I'm a blunt person, so I'll put this bluntly. While John's might not have been, mine certainly was. If you're so *stupid* that you can't even take two seconds to figure out *WHY

Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

At 21:47 -0700 on 17/12/02, J Sand wrote: >Oh common? Enough said! I like you, but I can't resist pointing out that you complained about a common (almost acceptable) misspelling of "dammit" and then immediately misspelling "come on" ... ;) -- the pickle FAQ So

Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

Danny, None were meant to be an attack. I get just as frustrated as you do about email BS in my mailbox that is unnecessary if someone would bother to spend the time to fix it so I didn't have to waste my time reading it. Next time you have a complaint about an automated list, try sending it

Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

Oh common? Enough said! John _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail -- Quadlist is sponsored by and... Small Dog Electronicshttp://ww

Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

Oh common you have to resort to name calling and trying to insult me just because I said something out of frustration that I received 20 "Warning" mails today, and I would think that the maintainer of these lists would read them to so stop with the personal attacks before I start and for your fathe

Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

> >> > >DON'T Send me another "WARNING LETTER" God dammit this has been happening > >for months. God you don't get to spam people I am fed up. > >I don't suppose you ever considered *following* the instructions in the >warning >message, did you? > >Nah, that never would have occurred to someone s

Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

At 21:46 -0600 on 17/12/02, Danny Saul wrote: >On 12/17/02 2:13 PM, "lem-swap administration" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> This is an automated message from the lem-swap mailing list manager. >> >> List messages sent to your address <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> have >> bounced. >> >> If you read this m

Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

>From: Danny Saul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Quadlist) >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Quadlist) >Subject: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages >Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 21:46:08 -0600 > >On 12/17/02 2:13 PM, "lem-swap admini

NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

On 12/17/02 2:13 PM, "lem-swap administration" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is an automated message from the lem-swap mailing list manager. > > List messages sent to your address <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> have > bounced. > > If you read this message, your mail system has been probably fixed. > >