Re: new thread, not sure what

At 6:57 PM -0600 on 07/31/02, Rob wittily wrote: >Isn't that sweet, the traditional joining of the LAN's. Is it going to be a >large event? > >Rob > No it will be however many Macs that I have and that I can connect to ethernet, currently I have 3, with 2 connected, connected to 2 PCs. So just

Re: new thread, not sure what

Isn't that sweet, the traditional joining of the LAN's. Is it going to be a large event? Rob - Original Message - From: "Denny Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Quadlist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:20 PM Subject: Re: n

Re: new thread, not sure what

At 11:20 -0700 on 31/07/02, Denny Davis wrote: >So at this point what versions of AIM are suitable for a Quadra 610? Also is AIM 4.0.something works on a 68K but I've found it *very* unreliable. There's a pretty good chance the ads are what's causing the crashes I've experienced, but I haven't

Re: new thread, not sure what

At 2:28 PM -0500 on 07/26/02, John Teffer wittily wrote: >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Anyone know how how to ftp with a 'doze box? Maybe then I could send >> files directly to a Mac with a "Web Sharing" page? > >Well, it's not FTP... > >Since I'm on AOL Instant Messenger constantly anyway, w

Re: new thread, not sure what(AOL 2.7)

I wrote: >>AOL 2.7 supportwe don't need no stinkin' support! the pickle replied: >As I understood it, they weren't just dropping "support" - they were >dropping the functionality required to even *use* AOL 2.x and earlier with >the current AOL server-side software. Oh, I see what you mean

Re: new thread, not sure what(AOL 2.7)

At 14:01 -0400 on 27/07/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >AOL 2.7 supportwe don't need no stinkin' support! As I understood it, they weren't just dropping "support" - they were dropping the functionality required to even *use* AOL 2.x and earlier with the current AOL server-side software. the p

Re: new thread, not sure what(AOL 2.7)

<< >just froze up the machine. I see I can download AOL 2.7, but I don't think I >can get any free hours with that. And AOL is dropping support for anything before 3.0 either Real Soon Now(tm) or already did. the pickle>> You should be able to get the free hours regardless of what AOL v

Re: new thread, not sure what

At 22:27 -0700 on 26/07/02, catalina_eddie wrote: >just froze up the machine. I see I can download AOL 2.7, but I don't think I >can get any free hours with that. And AOL is dropping support for anything before 3.0 either Real Soon Now(tm) or already did. the pickle FAQ

Re: AOL Usage (was: new thread, not sure what)

AOL usage cost has nothing to do with which version of the client you use. The "Free Hours" bait-and-switch dates back to the days when there was a per-minute charge for using the service. The latest come-on I received offered 1025 hours within forty-five days of initial sign-on; that's just 5

Re: new thread, not sure what

> From: "catalina_eddie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Still, I think it's about time to fire up the modem, jury rig a phone > connection, and get the mac online. Any favorite cheap ISPs for Mac out > there?. My AOL 7.0, free fer a jillion hours till you forget to cancel, disk > just froze up the machin

new thread, not sure what

Hey thanks for all the input on Win into Mac. It's been real informative as well as quite entertaining. I've noted everything said and checked out as many as I could. Today I downloaded five small mac progs on my PC, took them out to my Mac, and all five of them converted, no sweat. It's the first

Re: new thread, not sure what

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Anyone know how how to ftp with a 'doze box? Maybe then I could send > files directly to a Mac with a "Web Sharing" page? Well, it's not FTP... Since I'm on AOL Instant Messenger constantly anyway, when I want to quickly send a file or three from one computer to ano

Re: new thread, not sure what

At 10:52 -0400 on 26/07/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Anyone know how how to ftp with a 'doze box? Maybe then I could send There are LOTS of FTP clients for Windoze. My college used WS-FTP. >files directly to a Mac with a "Web Sharing" page? You can't upload files to a Mac running Personal We

Re: new thread, not sure what

At 08:32 -0700 on 26/07/02, John Niven wrote: >I have found that it is much more reliable to change the file extension from >.hqx to .txt before down loading through Netscape on my work PC. I don't know >why. Maybe there are some settings in Netscape that are not right. Once >downloaded you can c

Re: new thread, not sure what

> From: John Teffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > As long as you keep the Mac application in an archive until it gets to the > Mac, and un-compress it on the Mac, it doesn't matter whether you downloaded > it on a PC or a Mac or a Commodore 64. I have found that it is much more reliable to change the fi

Re: new thread, not sure what

> You can't upload files to a Mac running Personal Web Sharing, at least not > via FTP. The Mac needs to be running an FTP server. I used the built-in FTP server of MacSSH succesfully for uploading files from my PC to the Mac. Works like a charm. Ronald >From Delft... where even the weather is

Re: new thread, not sure what

My Reply follows quote. On 26/07/2002 01:04 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Teffer) >Sender:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> From: Frank Gentry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> A Mac application contains certain components that t

Re: new thread, not sure what

Hi Don, I think you have run headlong into one of the differences between the Mac OS and the PC. I ran into this years ago while using a PC card in my 8500. What follows is an oversimplification; but may help you to understand what is happening: A Mac application contains certain components th

Re: new thread, not sure what

> From: Frank Gentry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > A Mac application contains certain components that the PC application does > not. When a Mac app is downloaded by a PC, these components are "left > behind;" and, as you found, the app won't work. There are exceptions to > this; but as a general rule,

Re: New thread, not sure what...

--- catalina_eddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Gang, > > I'm new to mac ownertship, like maybe six weeks and I'm developing > more > questions than I have vocabulary to ask, so forgive the incoherence. > > I've been trying to download stuff for my mac such as the SW 2500 > driver 'n > like t

Re: New thread, not sure what...

on 7/24/02 1:42 AM, catalina_eddie at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Go here. > http://www.danamania.com/ > I have a Q 605, 32M, 2.1G running OS 7.5, and things are really fine 'ceptin > I just don't know about some things, like, I don't know about setting up PC > Exchange, and the instructions I re

Re: New thread, not sure what...

> From: "catalina_eddie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I've been trying to download stuff for my mac such as the SW 2500 driver 'n > like that, but all I have currently connected to the internet is a PC and > nothing I've downloaded seems to work. Is this the way things are and am I > expecting too much

New thread, not sure what...

Hi Gang, I'm new to mac ownertship, like maybe six weeks and I'm developing more questions than I have vocabulary to ask, so forgive the incoherence. I've been trying to download stuff for my mac such as the SW 2500 driver 'n like that, but all I have currently connected to the internet is a PC