Re: spam blockers (was Re: SpamEnder)

2003-10-21 Thread Otto Hansen
> Mozilla Thunderbird's appears to be similar in function but I > haven't had a > chance yet to really test it. > > Scott Holder > Thunderbird has a great implementation of bayesean (sp?) filtering...train it for a while with spam mails (or save a bunch and do it at once) and it will do a pretty g

Re: spam blockers (was Re: SpamEnder)

2003-10-21 Thread Denny Davis
At 1:59 AM -0400 on 10/21/03, Scott Holder wittily wrote: >> >>Yeah I have spam too, but I am the Secretary of a club and the main contact >>person for it, also I subscribe to lots and lots of email lists and I get >>email from people on those same lists. I don't I am a candidate for one of >>the

Re: spam blockers (was Re: SpamEnder)

2003-10-21 Thread pjspop
At 1:59 -0400 on 10/21/03, you (Scott Holder), wrote: >> >>Yeah I have spam too, but I am the Secretary of a club and the main contact (snip) >>legitimate email. :-} > > Don't necessarily need to give up hope. I've been using Eudora 6 since it (snip) > is very nearly 100% with very little missed.

Re: spam blockers (was Re: SpamEnder)

2003-10-20 Thread Scott Holder
Yeah I have spam too, but I am the Secretary of a club and the main contact person for it, also I subscribe to lots and lots of email lists and I get email from people on those same lists. I don't I am a candidate for one of the SPAM blocking apps, well unless I want to simply not have a lot of my

spam blockers (was Re: SpamEnder)

2003-10-20 Thread Denny Davis
At 12:54 PM -0500 on 10/19/03, Gordon Elliott wittily wrote: >> > > -- >> > > SpamEnder stops 100% of all SPAM e-mail and NEVER blocks the e-mail >you >> wish >> > > to receive. It even comes with a Money Back Guarantee. For more >> > > in