[quagga-dev 15355] Re: Straw man (wacko?) idea on releases, process, and repo structure

+ 1 for the suggestion We could have something close to what Linux kernel does, having one kernel version as LTS and the other versions as non-lts. I also feel that when patches are sent we could segregate them based on the severity. For eg: new features could go in to a separate branch/repo (eg:

[quagga-dev 15354] Re: Straw man (wacko?) idea on releases, process, and repo structure

+1 On 5/23/2016 12:45 PM, Donald Sharp wrote: +1 donald On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Lou Berger > wrote: So in thinking about the problems we are discussing this and a little bit more, considering the comments made on the list as well

[quagga-dev 15353] Re: Patch Submittal Process Going Forward Discussion.

All -- The meeting is tomorrow. If you have a proposal for how you would like the Patch submittal process to work, I would like to have it in an email format before the meeting tomorrow. Additionally if you would like to attend, please send me a email and I'll add you to the list of invites.